ReadWriteWeb

Mama don't let your baby grow up to be a Generalist

Written by Richard MacManus / June 21, 2004 11:44 PM / 10 Comments

It's fun to be a Generalist, you get to explore a variety of different topics and it often makes for good blogging. People don't really know what to expect when they see a new Read/Write Web item in their RSS Aggregator (although given my current experiment to try and blog a "short and pithy" post every day, odds are that reader expectations have fallen somewhat). And that uncertainty, that "what the heck is he on about this time?" response that I'm sure you all have of me - or perhaps it's "what the heck is he on?" - you have to admit, it makes for interesting browsing ...sometimes... when I'm not crapping on about XHTML validation or some such boring thing.

Anyway... see I've digressed already. That just proves the point I was going to make before I got distracted - that generalists have short attention spans. The other point I want to make is that you can't earn a decent living out of being a Generalist. And you never really 'fit in' anywhere. Let me elucidate...

In my day job I'm a 'Web Producer'. What does this entail? Mainly mind-numbingly boring website maintenance. Why is this? You're an intelligent, analytical, innovative writer (I hear you saying, leaping to my defence as the loyal readers I know you are). Author of the 'Synchonicity Meme' currently doing the rounds of the blogosphere. Inventer of the Microcontent Wiki. The visionary who thought up the Fractal Blogosphere. Why is this highly intelligent person stuck doing menial jobs like creating online ASP forms and converting Visio diagrams to PDF 8 hours a day, 40 hours a week? Ok I'm exaggerating. But it's still a good question: why aren't I satisfied in my career? And the sad answer is: because I'm a Generalist.

But lest this turn into a self-pitying post, I should advise that some aspects of my job are interesting. Like managing the creation of a new Intranet for a subsidiary company in Australia, developing web strategies for one of the biggest private companies in New Zealand, and experimenting with wikis. But the reality is, because I'm a jack of all trades Generalist, too much of my time gets taken up doing menial Web things for business people - just because I can.

There's a name for this in rugby (New Zealand's national sport). The Utility Back. This is a player who can cover a number of positions in the backline - usually fullback, winger, centre, second-five, even the premier position of first-five. Now the Utility Back often gets picked in All Black test squads, because of his versatility. He can cover a few positions, should one of the specialists get injured or loses form. And a Utility Back is a perfect man to take on tour, for the same reason. So being a Utility Back is good for your career, in the beginning that is. But the problem is, once your career as a Utility Back is established - it becomes very very difficult to nail down a specialist position in the backline. So the Utility Back invariably finishes their career sitting on the bench, frustrated at not getting any play as a first-team regular. That's precisely what's happening to my career. And I've got to change - I need to specialize so I can wear the famous black jersey with the silver fern (oh wait a minute, that's another dream).

Being a Generalist is obvious too in my place in the "blogosphere". I tackle a lot of subjects: web design, web development, knowledge management, strategy, music, social software...the list goes on. Most bloggers are sensible and stick to the 2-3 topics that are dear to their heart. Topics that, in the Web Tech neighbourhood of the blogosphere at least, match their real-world jobs. Designers always talk about Design. Social Software researchers talk about social software. Developers talk about hating Microsoft. This is all very sensible. Pick a subject and specialize in it.

And birds of a feather stick together. Designers groom each others nests (er, I mean websites), developers peck away at their keyboards, researchers fly south to their conferences. What do I do? I like to think I'm Jonathan Livingston Seagull, free to do my own thing, but maybe I'm just a lost sparrow looking for breadcrumbs.

Well I resolve to limit my weblog topics to these:

- Strategy
- Knowledge Management
- Website Management (Planning & Implementation)
- Information Architecture
- Multimedia (to keep things interesting)

That's about as narrow as I can make it. Significantly I'll try not to focus on the following things, even though they're interests of mine and I'm competent at all of them:

- Web Design
- Programming
- Usability
- Topic Mapping (although one could argue it's a part of info architecture)
- XML

It's hard for a Natural Born Generalist to ignore topics, but the reality of today's supply/demand world is that one must focus on a niche. My niche is going to be Writing, Analysis, Strategy, Knowledge Management (which I think covers all the topics above that I said I'm sticking with). Focus, dude.

Incidentally when I was 11/12 years old, I was a star left winger in my rugby team (Hutt Valley Marist). I scored the most amount of tries that year and was named Player of the Year. I kicked the goals too. I was skilful and fast. And I really enjoyed my rugby at that time in my life. I loved being the star winger. Yes yes, I know I was only 11 - leave me with my childhood dreams though :-)

To sum up: I hearby declare to you, don't let your children grow up to be Generalists. Save them before it's too late. Teach them the value of specializing in niches. And if you see me indulging in things that aren't in my list of niche topics, write a scathing comment on my weblog.


2 TrackBacks

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://www.readwriteweb.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/2371

Comments

Subscribe to comments for this post OR Subscribe to comments for all Read/WriteWeb posts

  • By your own advice, I should write a scathing comment on this.

    Posted by: Andrew | June 21, 2004 8:32 AM



  • as a fellow generalist i share your pain brother !

    Posted by: anu | June 21, 2004 12:58 PM



  • Ai. What a miserable point. Yep, you describe my life (minus the Rugby)

    More thoughts and comments here : http://www.nooranch.com/synaesmedia/wiki/wiki.cgi?GeneralistsVsSpecialists

    Posted by: phil jones | June 21, 2004 4:13 PM



  • Not sure... I enjoy your blog as it is (and topic maps stuff by the way :). You can't cut part of your personality to fit a niche, why cutting it for your weblog?

    Unless, of course, you want a highly focused weblog to optimise your income from Google ads :)))

    Posted by: Lilia | June 21, 2004 4:35 PM



  • Andrew, good point ;-)

    Thanks Anu and Phil for your feedback.

    Lilia, heh heh believe it or not I hadn't even thought of the Google ads. Currently I earn enough for about 2 cappacinos a month from those :-)

    No, the issue for me is that although my blog may be entertaining as is - the reality is I'm stuck in Stasis in my career (which unfortunately in this world makes up a big part of one's life). So I need to start focussing on niches.

    Posted by: Richard MacManus | June 21, 2004 4:42 PM



  • :D Interesting Post, I suppose the "Don't be a generalist"-Thesis was mainly rethorical to get across a couple of other points, but I'll do as if I hadn't noticed and defend being a generalist:

    I agree that a as a generalist you sometimes get in situations where you are doing (not-so-exciting) stuff, just because you can. But behold: It may only seem "mind-numbingly boring" from your generalist POV, remember that there likely are specialists that do exactly that, and they never get a chance to do anything else (OK, I am exaggerating a bit here). And likely they are ok with it, because from their POV it's actually interesting.

    And make no mistake (
    1) {specialist-activity} is always 10% inspiration and 90% transpiration.
    2) The grass is always greener on the other side.

    And there are advantages of being a generalist: You are not as vulnerable to "group think", you can value opinions/facts from more than one POV.
    You said being a generalist only pays of at the beginning of a career - I disagree, it will also pay of later, in (higher) Management you will mostly find people that are (also) Generalists (even if they started out as specialists).

    And the most important: Being a human is about being a generalist. You have to be part philosopher to make sense of life and find long-term goals that motivate you (a career _alone_ will not be it); you have to be part student to learn how to learn and to keep learning in different stages of your life; you have to be part teacher to share what you learned with your companions; with your children, you have to be part historian to make sure that you do your part in preventing that the worst acts of humanity repeat themselfes; you have to be part controller not only to take care of your finances, but to take care of your most valuable asset: _time_; you have to be part social worker to be there for friends and family when they need you in times of trouble; you have to be part journalist to filter the relevant bits of information from the overwhelming supply and to be able to seperate the truthful from the wrong; you have to be part blue-collar worker for you will only get anywhere in life if you have endurance. And this list could go on and on...

    If you agree that being a generalist is a quality in itself (which I beliebe it is), rather than merely being another way of saying of "shallow knowledge of many things, instead of deep knowledge of few things", - if you agree it is a quality in itself, then you will also agree that mothers should want their kids to grow up to become generalists. You want to be able to "master" your life first, and master your career second.

    There, I hope you feel better being a generalist now...

    Posted by: Sencer | June 23, 2004 7:08 AM



  • This comment has been through a spacetime wormhole it seems... I don't recall ever writing it.

    Posted by: Seb | June 25, 2004 10:39 AM



  • For good measure, here's a more relevant link - http://chocnvodka.blogware.com/blog/_archives/2004/5/8/54483.html

    Posted by: Seb | June 25, 2004 10:40 AM



  • Seb, yes unfortunately I've been having some problems with my comments system, and the one you pointed out actually belongs to a post from a while ago. I'll get that sorted out soon...Phil is working on the Pycs comments system as we speak.

    update 29/6/04 I've now swapped to MT comments and have removed that out-of-time comment from this thread.

    Posted by: Richard MacManus | June 25, 2004 11:19 PM



  • I happened upon an old post of Seb's and thought I'd share it with you:

    http://radio.weblogs.com/0110772/2003/03/13.html#a827

    Posted by: Andrew | July 8, 2004 4:54 PM




RECENT JOBS



TEXT LINK ADS


RWW PARTNERS


RWW READERS


RWW POLL