<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" 
      xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/ie_is_dead_long.php" />
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/atom.xml" />
  <id>tag:,2009:/1/tag:72.47.210.69,2003://1.4041-</id>
  <updated></updated>
  <title>Comments for IE is dead - long live Longhorn</title>
  
  <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 4.23-en</generator>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2003://1.4041</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/ie_is_dead_long.php" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=4041" title="IE is dead - long live Longhorn" />
    <published>2003-05-30T05:48:33Z</published>
    <updated>2007-12-16T23:15:27Z</updated>
    <title>IE is dead - long live Longhorn</title>
    <summary><![CDATA[A hot topic in the blogging world recently has been: is Microsoft's Internet Explorer browser dead?&nbsp;Ironically, most of the good stuff to read&nbsp;has been via "Comments" forms - ie readers writing back to&nbsp;a weblog post. Robert Scoble from Microsoft said "The right question is: 'is the Web dead in Longhorn?' "&nbsp;and he got over 30...]]></summary>
    <author>
      <name>Richard MacManus</name>
      <uri>http://www.readwriteweb.com</uri>
    </author>
    
    <category term="Analysis / Strategy" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.readwriteweb.com/">
      <![CDATA[<p><P>A hot topic in the blogging world recently has been: <A href="http://www.slightlybent.com/200305archive001.asp#1053867954001">is Microsoft's Internet Explorer browser dead?</A>&nbsp;Ironically, most of the good stuff to read&nbsp;has been via "Comments" forms - ie readers writing back to&nbsp;a weblog post. <A href="http://radio.weblogs.com/0001011/2003/05/27.html#a3118">Robert Scoble from Microsoft said</A> "The right question is: 'is the Web dead in Longhorn?' "&nbsp;and he got <A href="http://www.haloscan.com/comments.php?user=scoble&amp;comment=3118">over 30 comments</A> written to his weblog. Some were the usual bleatings about fixing CSS and why can't IE have tabs like Mozilla, etc. I posted&nbsp;a comment&nbsp;myself, which said:&nbsp;"How about converting IE into a browser/editor, so we can read and write the web at the same time??" I put no justification into this remark, as I was just curious to see if I got any bites. Well Robert himself replied, saying yes he'd like that too. But&nbsp;he also said something about not wanting to&nbsp;upset weblog vendors.&nbsp;This response was deleted from the Comments section&nbsp;soon after, as I can't find any trace of it now.&nbsp;But never mind about that,&nbsp;I liked hearing that the concept of a browser/editor is&nbsp;being kicked around&nbsp;in the Microsoft world.</P> <P>Weblog tools have&nbsp;come close to achieving the 2-way web dream of allowing people to both browse and edit the Web. But I don't believe there is an existing tool that bundles (dangerous word) the browsing-writing-aggregating functionalities into 1 product. I use <A href="http://www.userland.com/">Radio Userland</A> as my web writing tool, <A href="http://www.feedreader.com/">Feedreader</A> as my RSS aggregator, and (you guessed it) IE as my browser. It would make sense to have an all-in-one tool that does all 3 of those things, not to mention also being a PIM (Personal Information Manager) a la <A href="http://www.osafoundation.org/">Chandler</A> or <A href="http://haystack.lcs.mit.edu/">Haystack</A>.&nbsp;</P> <P>A few&nbsp;bloggers&nbsp;believe&nbsp;Microsoft's plans&nbsp;go even&nbsp;further - that the browser will be integrated (a nicer way of saying bundled?)&nbsp;into Microsoft's next-generation&nbsp;Longhorn OS. Or as <A href="http://dotnetweblogs.com/donxml/posts/7614.aspx">DonXML</A> nicely put it: "Longhorn has become the first major step towards a Web Based OS".&nbsp;If you&nbsp;throw writing and pub-sub functionality into this new web-based OS, then weblog vendors would have reason to be afraid.&nbsp;Or do they? Maybe it will come down to who innovates the best, who has the most functionality you require,&nbsp;whose dream you buy into (think Open Source ideology).&nbsp;</P> <P>The&nbsp;web browser as a product may well be as good as shelved by Microsoft. But as <A href="http://www.tbray.org/ongoing/When/200x/2003/05/28/CSS-IE">Tim Bray</A> points out:&nbsp;"...what program, I ask, do most users spend most of their time in? The web browser."&nbsp;Ergo, if Microsoft's most used product is being obsoleted, you can bet there will be a replacement that does what the browser did and much more.</P></p>]]>
      
    </content>
  </entry>

</feed>