<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" 
      xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/learn_by_writin.php" />
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/atom.xml" />
  <id>tag:,2009:/1/tag:72.47.210.69,2003://1.4053-</id>
  <updated>2009-10-30T15:00:40Z</updated>
  <title>Comments for Learn by writing</title>
  
  <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 4.23-en</generator>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2003://1.4053</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/learn_by_writin.php" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=4053" title="Learn by writing" />
    <published>2003-06-22T07:41:28Z</published>
    <updated>2007-12-16T23:15:27Z</updated>
    <title>Learn by writing</title>
    <summary><![CDATA[Mark Pilgrim: "I take in a lot of raw data, synthesize it, and spit it back out in ways that many people can understand." Mark Pilgrim and Neil Deakin&nbsp;are two very smart web developers, but more importantly they&nbsp;both have the&nbsp;ability to&nbsp;document complex web technology in laymans language -&nbsp;so that&nbsp;wannabes can learn it too. This is...]]></summary>
    <author>
      <name>Richard MacManus</name>
      <uri>http://www.readwriteweb.com</uri>
    </author>
    
    <category term="Writing" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.readwriteweb.com/">
      <![CDATA[<p><P><A href="http://waffle.wootest.net/iron/mark_pilgrim.php">Mark Pilgrim</A>: "I take in a lot of raw data, synthesize it, and spit it back out in ways that many people can understand."</P> <P><A href="http://diveintomark.org/">Mark Pilgrim</A> and <A href="http://www.xulplanet.com/ndeakin/aboutme.html">Neil Deakin</A>&nbsp;are two very smart web developers, but more importantly they&nbsp;both have the&nbsp;ability to&nbsp;document complex web technology in laymans language -&nbsp;so that&nbsp;<A href="http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=wannabe">wannabes</A> can learn it too. <S>This is different to&nbsp;technical writing, which&nbsp;means documenting a piece of&nbsp;software for its&nbsp;<A href="http://www.webopedia.com/TERM/e/end_user.html">end users</A>.</S></P> <P>One of the best ways&nbsp;to learn&nbsp;something is to document it. The beauty of the read/write web is that it makes it easy to do this, and easy for&nbsp;everyone to contribute.</P> <P>Revision 24/7/03: I struck out the sentence about technical writing, because tech writing as a discipline&nbsp;actually covers writing for both wannabes and end users - and many other types of audiences too.<FONT size=2></P></FONT></p>]]>
      
    </content>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2003://1.4053-comment:35135</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2003://1.4053" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/learn_by_writin.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/learn_by_writin.php#c35135" />
    <title>Comment from Jenny on 2003-07-22</title>
    <author>
        <name>Jenny</name>
        <uri>http://www.creativetechwriter.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.creativetechwriter.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>I beg to differ with your comparison of technical writing with Mark Pilgrim's ability to boil down complex tech in layman's terms.</p>

<p>Technical writing is not, as you mention, simply documenting software for end users. Although a significant amount of tech writing is in this realm, tech writing, as a whole, actually means documenting technical subjects so that one's audience understands them. You illustrated this in your quote from Mark Pilgrim and your subsequent compliment on his ability to document complex tech in layman's language. Since Mark's audience consists of "web dev wannabes" as well as seasoned web developers, he must put things into layman's terms if he wishes to be understood by as many people as possible. </p>

<p>By the same token, if Mark's audience consisted of only seasoned web developers (a much smaller group by comparison), I daresay he wouldn't be using layman's terms to explain his ideas. Instead, he'd be using jargon and other shortcuts to communicate, which is much easier and quicker to do than to use layman's terms.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2003-07-22T19:23:58Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2003://1.4053-comment:35136</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2003://1.4053" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/learn_by_writin.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/learn_by_writin.php#c35136" />
    <title>Comment from Richard MacManus on 2003-07-22</title>
    <author>
        <name>Richard MacManus</name>
        <uri>http://www.readwriteweb.com/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.readwriteweb.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Yes you're right Jenny. I've been thinking myself about this post and how my definition of tech writing wasn't quite right. Not one of my better posts :-) You hit the nail on the head with this definition: </p>

<p>"tech writing, as a whole, actually means documenting technical subjects so that one's audience understands them."</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2003-07-22T20:26:26Z</published>
  </entry>

</feed>