<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" 
      xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/the_universal_c.php" />
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/atom.xml" />
  <id>tag:,2008:/1/tag:72.47.210.69,2003://1.4050-</id>
  <updated>2008-09-24T12:30:19Z</updated>
  <title>Comments for The Universal Canvas System</title>
  
  <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 4.1</generator>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2003://1.4050</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/the_universal_c.php" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=4050" title="The Universal Canvas System" />
    <published>2003-06-17T05:18:35Z</published>
    <updated>2007-12-16T23:15:27Z</updated>
    <title>The Universal Canvas System</title>
    <summary>Last night I wrote about the Universal Canvas. Today in my RSS newsreader, what should appear but a great post from Steve Gillmor on the same topic. Of course being a pro, Steve made his point way better than me. Microsoft has all the pieces, says Steve, to &quot;create a browser-hosted read-write tool for sharing...</summary>
    <author>
      <name>Richard MacManus</name>
      <uri>http://www.readwriteweb.com</uri>
    </author>
    
    <category term="Two Way Web" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.readwriteweb.com/">
      <![CDATA[<p><P>Last night I wrote about the Universal Canvas. Today in my RSS newsreader, what should appear but <A href="http://www.crn.com/weblogs/stevegillmor/2003/06/15/15.asp#42674">a great post from Steve Gillmor</A> on the same topic. Of course being a pro, Steve made his point way better than me. Microsoft has all the pieces, says Steve, to "create a browser-hosted read-write tool for sharing and routing information." </P> <P>But&nbsp;the pieces are being fitted together to reveal a jigsaw puzzle that looks suspiciously like the Windows Operating System. As Steve puts it: "We'll get the long-promised Universal Canvas, but sorry folks it will have to be Windows end to end." </P> <P>Steve also wrote in <A href="http://www.crn.com/weblogs/stevegillmor/2003/06/14/14.asp#42672">an earlier post</A> that "Office is now a System, BizTalk is now a System (Jupiter) and IE is part of the Operating System."</P> <P>All this talk (including from me) about the universal canvas moving away from the browser and into the Office/Operating system, is a little scary. The World Wide Web was originally meant to be a decentralized network of information where people could read and write freely, as in <EM>both</EM> free beer and free speech. </P> <P>Sure the browser market&nbsp;has been largely controlled by Microsoft these last few years, but at least&nbsp;browsers run&nbsp;on the&nbsp;World Wide Web -&nbsp;and the Web&nbsp;is as universal as it gets in the digital domain.&nbsp;So where does it leave&nbsp;us&nbsp;if the future canvas for our browsing and creating is&nbsp;embedded in&nbsp;a "system", owned by one company,&nbsp;rather than on a universal network owned by no one? Is&nbsp;the Universal Canvas&nbsp;going to bypass the Web?</P></p>]]>
      
    </content>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2003://1.4050-comment:35133</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2003://1.4050" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/the_universal_c.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/the_universal_c.php#c35133" />
    <title>Comment from Micah Alpern on 2003-06-16</title>
    <author>
        <name>Micah Alpern</name>
        <uri>http://www.alpern.org</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.alpern.org">
        <![CDATA[<p>> I've become very interested in the <br />
> "Universal Canvas", a term popularized by<br />
> Microsoft and subsequently analyzed by Jon<br />
> Udell</p>

<p>Wasn't this term first popularized by Apple with their failed OpenDoc program?</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2003-06-16T13:45:48Z</published>
  </entry>

</feed>