<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" 
      xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/web_of_ideas.php" />
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/atom.xml" />
  <id>tag:,2009:/1/tag:72.47.210.69,2003://1.4069-</id>
  <updated></updated>
  <title>Comments for Web of Ideas</title>
  
  <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 4.23-en</generator>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2003://1.4069</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/web_of_ideas.php" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=4069" title="Web of Ideas" />
    <published>2003-07-25T05:14:28Z</published>
    <updated>2007-12-16T23:15:27Z</updated>
    <title>Web of Ideas</title>
    <summary><![CDATA[A lot of people are getting pretty excited about "social software". Bloggers like Joi Ito and Marc Canter are writing with gusto&nbsp;about social software. I'm&nbsp;hearing lots of trendy new acronyms and phrases -&nbsp;FOAF, MetaBlogs, "reputation systems", "web of trust", "moblogging", "micro-content", etc etc. It's all getting to be a blur. But these are heady times...]]></summary>
    <author>
      <name>Richard MacManus</name>
      <uri>http://www.readwriteweb.com</uri>
    </author>
    
    <category term="Two Way Web" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.readwriteweb.com/">
      <![CDATA[<p><P>A lot of people are getting pretty excited about <A href="http://www.shirky.com/writings/group_politics.html">"social software"</A>. Bloggers like <A href="http://joi.ito.com/archives/2003/07/22/thoughts_on_microcontent_metadata_and_trends.html">Joi Ito</A> and <A href="http://blogs.it/0100198/2003/07/23.html#a1532">Marc Canter</A> are writing with gusto&nbsp;about social software. I'm&nbsp;hearing lots of trendy new acronyms and phrases -&nbsp;<A href="http://rdfweb.org/foaf/">FOAF</A>, <A href="http://joi.ito.com/joiwiki/MetaBlogs">MetaBlogs</A>, "reputation systems", "web of trust", "moblogging", "micro-content", etc etc. It's all getting to be a blur. But these are heady times and everyone&nbsp;is out there hunting&nbsp;that <A href="http://www.melville.org/hmmoby.htm">White Whale</A>,&nbsp;the <A href="http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/">Semantic Web</A>.</P> <P>I'm going to&nbsp;add my own trendy phrase to the mix: <STRONG>Web of Ideas</STRONG>.</P> <P>Yes I know, "Web of Ideas" isn't a particularly original phrase. When I googled it, I found a number of old newspaper articles and school assignments that used it. But still I want to use it myself, because it succinctly states what I have always believed the World Wide Web is all about: dissemination of&nbsp;<STRONG>ideas</STRONG>. </P> <P><A href="http://www.emersoncentral.com/">Ralph Waldo Emerson</A>, a 19th century American writer,&nbsp;once said: "The ideas in every man's mind make him what he is."&nbsp;We're lucky to live in the 21st century. We have Web technologies such as weblogs and RSS&nbsp;to help us&nbsp;discover, create&nbsp;and share ideas. </P> <P>I'll write more about the Web of Ideas later. For now (it's getting late and I'm starting to ramble), I want to point to an interesting development at <A href="http://erikbenson.com/">Erik Benson's weblog</A>. Erik is developing an <A href="http://erikbenson.com/index.cgi?node=idea%20database">idea database</A>. Hey,&nbsp;good idea Erik ;-)</P></p>]]>
      
    </content>
  </entry>

</feed>