<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" 
      xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/the_will_to_pub.php" />
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/atom.xml" />
  <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2011:/1/tag:72.47.210.69,2003://1.4101-</id>
  <updated>2011-04-29T12:38:44Z</updated>
  <title>Comments for The will to publish</title>
  
  <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 4.35-en</generator>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2003://1.4101</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/the_will_to_pub.php" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=4101" title="The will to publish" />
    <published>2003-10-01T04:49:43Z</published>
    <updated>2007-12-16T23:15:28Z</updated>
    <title>The will to publish</title>
    <summary>2003 has so far been a year of hype for weblogs and k-logs. Blogging is on the cusp of the mainstream. Or is it? A few posts recently have me wondering: why would normal people want to publish to the Web? Mark Pilgrim: &quot;... itís possible that an unfiltered... unedited... personal publishing system... with instantaneous...</summary>
    <author>
      <name>Richard MacManus</name>
      <uri>http://www.readwriteweb.com</uri>
    </author>
    
    <category term="Web 2.0" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.readwriteweb.com/">
      <![CDATA[<p>2003 has so far been a year of hype for <a href="http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/whatMakesAWeblogAWeblog">weblogs</a> and <a href="http://jrobb.mindplex.org/stories/2003/07/29/klogProductivityTimeToFindAndAvailability.html"> k-logs</a>. Blogging is on the cusp of the mainstream. Or is it? A few posts recently have me wondering: why would normal people want to publish to the Web?</p> <blockquote dir="ltr" style="MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px"> <p><a href="http://diveintomark.org/archives/2003/09/29/not_for_you">Mark Pilgrim</a>: "... itís possible that an unfiltered... unedited... personal publishing system... with instantaneous worldwide distribution... is not for you."</p> <p><a href="http://www.scraprap.com/danshafer/">Dan Shafer</a>: "OS integration...isn't the big feature that's going to draw millions of folks to blogging."</p> <p><a href="http://radio.weblogs.com/0001011/2003/09/29.html#a4849">Robert Scoble</a>, responding to Dan Shafer: "Personally, no one has found the mother lode of weblogging tools yet: corporate webloggers."</p> </blockquote> <p>My disclaimer: I believe strongly in the power of the two-way web - where any person can not only <strong>read</strong> and browse the World Wide Web, but they also have the power to <strong>write</strong> and publish to the Web. Mainstream publishing mediums today are mostly one-way. Newspapers, television, radio, magazines - these things all dish out content to a largely passive public. And people lap it up. We live in a <strong>Remote Control culture</strong>. We believe we have control over our ideas and thoughts, simply because we can flip to a different channel. Well the Web has changed all that. Weblogs in particular have shown us that not only can we <strong>consume</strong> content, we can <strong>create</strong> it too.</p> <p>Now that my prejudices are out of the way, let's consider some real life issues. How many people have cottoned onto the read/write revolution? How many people actually have a reason or the inclination to publish their ideas and thoughts to the Web? In my country, New Zealand, I only know of a handful of people who blog. I'm definitely in a minority. And I have to wonder whether it will always be a minority activity. I hope not, but consider this...</p> <p>I've been working on Intranet development over the past 5 years, in a variety of companies. And you know what the biggest challenge has always been? Getting the "content owners" to write stuff. There are always a few business users who are keen to publish their own content, but these people are the minority. The majority of business users don't want to write and publish content on the Intranet. The excuse I hear most often is that they don't have time and it's not what they're paid to do. Which are perfectly valid reasons. What business people are really saying is: hey, I don't have any interest in writing or publishing - I have my own job to do (be it accounting, legal, corporate, marketing, whatever).</p> <p>Granted, partly this has been a tools issue. Over the years I've managed my fair share of unnecessarily complex Content Management Systems. But in 2003 we have the option of using weblog authoring systems like Radio Userland and Movable Type. Those tools are proof that publishing can be a 'one-click' experience. And now there are new tools being introduced to the market that make publishing even simpler, by taking the set-up and configuration hassle out of the equation - Typepad and i-book are two examples. So ease of use for publishing to the Web should no longer be an issue. But the question remains - do most people have a reason or inclination to write and publish on the Web? There's an old saying: where there's a will, there's a way. Do people have the <em>will</em> to publish?</p> <p>One path I see is one which <a href="http://blogs.it/0100198/">Marc Canter</a> has <a href="http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/crimson1/discuss/msgReader$729?mode=topic">been pushing</a>:</p> <blockquote dir="ltr" style="MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px"> <p>"Now it's time for Resumes, Reviews, Calendar Events, Recipes, Conversations and People.  These data structs are just as important as blog posts.  You can call them micro-content, new kinds of blog structs or whatever - but everybody wants to subscribe to them."</p> </blockquote> <p dir="ltr">...and everybody may want to write them too. The things Marc mentions are all simple, everyday things that people may be <em>willing</em> to contribute content to. Another trend I've noticed that people are doing in droves is taking pictures with their mobile phones. <a href="http://radio.weblogs.com/0114939/outlines/moblog.html">Moblogging</a> is the term for publishing data from a mobile device to a weblog. While moblogging is a minority activity now, the number of people who own a mobile phone capable of taking pictures is growing daily. Which means the potential for moblogging also grows. (me, I'm still waiting for photo-capable mobile phones to reduce in price - in this I'm not an early adopter!).</p> <p dir="ltr">Back to weblogging and writing. k-logs (which is the fancy term for corporate blogging) are being trumpeted by various people as being the next big thing in Intranet tools. This from <a href="http://jrobb.mindplex.org/stories/2003/07/29/klogProductivityTimeToFindAndAvailability.html"> John Robb</a>:</p> <blockquote dir="ltr" style="MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px"> <p dir="ltr"> "K-Logs radically increase the possibility that meaningful information and knowledge will be captured and archived on the Intranet.  There isn't another system that even comes close.  K-Logs provide employees with a system that is easy to use (virtually zero training), immediate benefits, and enhanced personal prestige/value."</p> </blockquote> <p dir="ltr">While I agree wholeheartily with the sentiments expressed by John and others like <a href="http://www.dijest.com/aka/categories/klogs/">Phil Wolff</a>, I wonder how practical it is to expect business people to write k-logs. It's all very well having tools like <a href="http://w4.evectors.it/">k-collector</a> to aggregate Intranet content, but the real issue is how do we get people to <strong>create the content</strong> in the first place? Interestingly, this is the exact same problem the Semantic Web has getting off the ground, people currently aren't writing enough metadata to make the Semantic Web happen.</p> <p dir="ltr">So while I am an avid supporter of the Two-Way Web, I do wonder whether writing to the Web will ever be more than just a minority activity. And if it does become popular, maybe we need to consider Mark Pilgrim's advice that it isn't for everyone. Personally, I hope that weblogging does become mainstream and helps people find their voices (on whatever topics are dear to them). </p> <p dir="ltr">The current blogging activity amongst <a href="http://www.lessig.org/blog/archives/cat_presidential_politics.shtml">American presidential candidates</a> is a fascinating experiment to see if weblogging has the legs to stand up in the mainstream. I actually wish <a href="http://www.scripting.com">Dave Winer</a> would blog more on this subject - perhaps he will after he's finished with <a href="http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/bloggerCon/">BloggerCon</a>, which is preaching to the converted. What we need to do now is preach to the masses ;-)</p>]]>
      
    </content>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2003://1.4101-comment:35178</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2003://1.4101" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/the_will_to_pub.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/the_will_to_pub.php#c35178" />
    <title>Comment from Shows On TV on 2004-04-27</title>
    <author>
        <name>Shows On TV</name>
        <uri>http://www.showsontv.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.showsontv.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>Remote Control got me! Attention spans are getting so brief that unless blogs feature MTV style jump cut edits dancing in front of our eyes, blogging will be only left to those with serious thoughts to contribute. The rest will be tranced and engrossed by the disco ball and nasty beats.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2004-04-28T06:21:41Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2003://1.4101-comment:35177</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2003://1.4101" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/the_will_to_pub.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/the_will_to_pub.php#c35177" />
    <title>Comment from Jan Karlsbjerg on 2003-10-26</title>
    <author>
        <name>Jan Karlsbjerg</name>
        <uri>http://www.karlsbjerg.net/blog/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.karlsbjerg.net/blog/">
        <![CDATA[<p>FYI, Mark Pilgrim's comment about the immediate publishing was meant for only one person, Dave Winer: <a href="http://www.karlsbjerg.net/blog/2003/10/10.html#a1049" rel="nofollow"><a href="http://www.karlsbjerg.net/blog/2003/10/10.html#a1049" rel="nofollow">http://www.karlsbjerg.net/blog/2003/10/10.html#a1049</a></a></p>

<p>The two of them have a long history of arguing and in that argument Dave Winer has repeatedly blurted out stuff on his weblog and then deleted it from the blog a few minutes later. Mark even made a little program that watched Dave Winer's site and records every bit of editing that Winer does -- and usually the edits are angry bursts that he then changes or deletes.</p>

<p>-Jan</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2003-10-27T02:06:36Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2003://1.4101-comment:35176</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2003://1.4101" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/the_will_to_pub.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/the_will_to_pub.php#c35176" />
    <title>Comment from Mark Sigal on 2003-10-23</title>
    <author>
        <name>Mark Sigal</name>
        <uri>http://www.verdada.com/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.verdada.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>I guess I would argue that the &#194;&#147;solution&#194;&#148; to this one is a combination of what Marc Canter and Bill Seitz allude to.  Start with the things that people are already doing to meta-create content: adding products to wish lists, clipping favorite articles, doing online research, writing an occasional review, writing and receiving emails, identifying businesses they like and trust, etc.  Enable them to save and organize this information (i.e., the product, the business, the web content, the email, the post &#194;&#150; not just the URL) in a one-click fashion.  Now, when they discover they have something they want to share (e.g., the research I did on figuring out my home wireless set up &#194;&#150; products, reviews, comparison pricing, manufacturer&#194;&#146;s data, user opinions, and my notes) make it one-click easy to send the entire list and supporting content, or any subset.  This way, the meta-content creation process is a by-product of the things that you are already doing, the publishing call to action is inspiration based (I read a post or receive an email from a friend asking about home wireless networking) and the cost of publishing is both one and highly personalized.  </p>

<p>In any event, that&#194;&#146;s the design goal of the product my company is about to go public on (starting Monday 10/27).  It&#194;&#146;s an online companion that integrates with your browser, email and email address book, and the basic version is free.  The following online resources can help you decide if VSOS serves your needs:</p>

<p>One pager (speaks to what VSOS is, why a typical user would want it and whom it is designed for): <a href="http://www.verdada.com/pdf/WHAT_WHY_and_WHO_of_VSOS.pdf" rel="nofollow"><a href="http://www.verdada.com/pdf/WHAT_WHY_and_WHO_of_VSOS.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.verdada.com/pdf/WHAT_WHY_and_WHO_of_VSOS.pdf</a></a><br />
 <br />
Eleven slide VSOS online tour: <a href="http://www.verdada.com/Presentation2.htm" rel="nofollow"><a href="http://www.verdada.com/Presentation2.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.verdada.com/Presentation2.htm</a></a></p>

<p>Best,</p>

<p>Mark</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2003-10-23T18:35:34Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2003://1.4101-comment:35175</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2003://1.4101" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/the_will_to_pub.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/the_will_to_pub.php#c35175" />
    <title>Comment from Zoe on 2003-09-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>Zoe</name>
        <uri>http://zoe.nu/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://zoe.nu/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Perhaps you are looking at it the wrong way...</p>

<p>Using http based tools (e.g. blogs) doesn't necessarely mean you want to "publish" to the entire world... perhaps your audiance is more limited... perhaps your audiance is your corporation... not the world...</p>

<p>In any case, "we" are working on this as we speak... stay tuned... perhaps "corporate webloggers" are not that far away after all...</p>

<p>In the meantime, some reading about the pitfalls of any intranet, no matter the technology of the day:</p>

<p>"Cities of Text"<br />
-- Marc Demarest, June 1997<br />
<a href="http://www.noumenal.com/marc/cot.html" rel="nofollow"><a href="http://www.noumenal.com/marc/cot.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.noumenal.com/marc/cot.html</a></a></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2003-09-30T18:11:30Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2003://1.4101-comment:35174</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2003://1.4101" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/the_will_to_pub.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/the_will_to_pub.php#c35174" />
    <title>Comment from Bill Seitz on 2003-09-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>Bill Seitz</name>
        <uri>http://webseitz.fluxent.com/wiki</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://webseitz.fluxent.com/wiki">
        <![CDATA[<p>I think the key is to focus on publishing stuff that needs to get written anyway.</p>

<p>* procedures, work flows, etc.</p>

<p>* mission, strategy, vision (corp level, team, project)</p>

<p>* logs of progress</p>

<p>* meeting agendas and outcomes</p>

<p>Most of this stuff is getting written anyway (or it sure as heck should be). The key is to get it out of MsWord and MsPowerPoint and into editable and linkable HTML.</p>

<p>An approach I like is using team-focused wiki spaces. Because that way everyone's work comes together most directly. (Though I still do discussions of those pages via email.)</p>

<p><a href="http://webseitz.fluxent.com/wiki/CorporateBlogging" rel="nofollow"><a href="http://webseitz.fluxent.com/wiki/CorporateBlogging" rel="nofollow">http://webseitz.fluxent.com/wiki/CorporateBlogging</a></a><br />
<a href="http://webseitz.fluxent.com/wiki/WikiForCollaborationWare" rel="nofollow"><a href="http://webseitz.fluxent.com/wiki/WikiForCollaborationWare" rel="nofollow">http://webseitz.fluxent.com/wiki/WikiForCollaborationWare</a></a><br />
<a href="http://webseitz.fluxent.com/wiki/EmailDiscussionBesideWiki" rel="nofollow"><a href="http://webseitz.fluxent.com/wiki/EmailDiscussionBesideWiki" rel="nofollow">http://webseitz.fluxent.com/wiki/EmailDiscussionBesideWiki</a></a></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2003-09-30T13:59:40Z</published>
  </entry>

</feed>
