<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" 
      xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/kill_blog.php" />
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/atom.xml" />
  <id>tag:,2008:/1/tag:72.47.210.69,2004://1.4192-</id>
  <updated>2008-09-24T12:29:26Z</updated>
  <title>Comments for Kill Blog</title>
  
  <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 4.1</generator>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2004://1.4192</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/kill_blog.php" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=4192" title="Kill Blog" />
    <published>2004-04-05T05:07:27Z</published>
    <updated>2007-12-16T23:15:31Z</updated>
    <title>Kill Blog</title>
    <summary><![CDATA[Hands up who wants to get rid of the word "blog"?&nbsp;I'm beginning to wonder whether the word "weblog" has&nbsp;outlived its purpose. But before you call the white coats, let me try and explain. You see, blogging to me has always meant&nbsp;writing and linking. Seb Paquet has a much more comprehensive definition, but in a nutshell...]]></summary>
    <author>
      <name>Richard MacManus</name>
      <uri>http://www.readwriteweb.com</uri>
    </author>
    
    <category term="Multimedia" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.readwriteweb.com/">
      <![CDATA[<p><img class="image" height="139" alt="Kill Bill movie" src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/killbill.jpg" width="99" />Hands up who wants to get rid of the word "blog"?&nbsp;I'm beginning to wonder whether the word "weblog" has&nbsp;outlived its purpose. But before you call the white coats, let me try and explain.</p> <p>You see, blogging to me has always meant&nbsp;writing and linking. <a href="http://radio.weblogs.com/0110772/">Seb Paquet</a> has a much <a href="http://radio.weblogs.com/0110772/stories/2002/10/03/ personalKnowledgePublishingAndItsUsesInResearch.html"> more comprehensive definition</a>, but in a nutshell blogging is all about publishing&nbsp;your writing&nbsp;and links.&nbsp;Nowadays we're entering a stage in <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/2003/04/20.html#a1">the Read/Write Web</a> (aka the <a href="http://www.thetwowayweb.com/">Two-Way Web</a>) where publishing to the Web is <strong>much more</strong> than writing and linking. It's about&nbsp;music, photos, videos, audio, <a href="http://www.shirky.com/writings/situated_software.html">situated software</a>&nbsp;applications, editing your&nbsp;<a href="http://www.orkut.com/">Orkut</a> profile, etc.</p> <p>Not everyone is, or wants to be,&nbsp;a writer. Boy have I found that out, the hard way, in my career so far as a Web Producer/Online Manager. Content Management has always been&nbsp;a big challenge in managing an Intranet or Internet website. The trendy strategy in recent years has been "distributed content management" - whereby you deploy a&nbsp;big 'ol&nbsp;Enterprise CMS, whack up some templates, and hand&nbsp;it over to the business to maintain the content. Well, that's the way it's <em>supposed</em> to work. But in reality, the majority of business people have little motivation to spend their time fiddling around with a website. Even the best Enterprise CMS's have a learning curve and&nbsp;all of them have some technical glitches and gotchas. So content maintenance often falls back on the IT dept or a Web-savvy&nbsp;team that specialises in content maintenance.</p> <p>Motivation really is the key word - most business people have no desire to write and publish content and it's usually not in their job descriptions. <a href="http://www.adaptivepath.com/publications/essays/archives/000315.php">Jeffrey Veen&nbsp;wrote an excellent article</a> recently on why Content Management Systems have failed - websites need Editors, he says. Websites are a publication and&nbsp;so they need specialist publishers to&nbsp;maintain them.</p> <p>To get back to blogging, there is a correlation with&nbsp;Content Management in the business world.&nbsp;Weblogging tools have undoubtedly made it easier for normal everyday people to publish their content to the Web. Just like Enterprise CMS's make it&nbsp;relatively easy&nbsp;for business folk to create and maintain content on their company's websites. But here's the crux: even&nbsp;though people have the tools nowadays, a large majority of them <strong>still don't have motivation</strong> to use them.</p> <p>So far, the blogging world has been mostly all about writing and links.&nbsp;Therefore people who like writing and linking are attracted to blogging. But that's a small percentage of people who use the Web.&nbsp;A lot of the general public, particularly the young and affluent,&nbsp;are already producing&nbsp;things on the Web. Music, photos, code, and so on. All they need is a vehicle to "publish" those things. For example, I know&nbsp;a few&nbsp;programmers who have some fantastic&nbsp;ideas&nbsp;about web development. But writing words isn't their forte - writing code is. So they tinker with code, make some notes, try out a few ideas&nbsp;- but all of this never gets published. Weblogs aren't quite the tool for that.</p> <p>And here's where I come back to the word "blog" and why I want to kill it off. Because it's so ingrained now as meaning writing and linking,&nbsp;it doesn't&nbsp;express the full variety of things that are beginning to be&nbsp;produced and created on the Web by 'amateurs'. The phrase "personal publishing" does a better job of describing this new range of multimedia production.</p> <p>In order for the personal publishing revolution to take off, I&nbsp;reckon we've got to break free of "the blogosphere" and propel ourselves into&nbsp;a new&nbsp;Universe of Personal Publishing. Sure, writing is my forte and I use my weblog primarily as a publishing tool. But there's a whole other world out there, ready to explore!</p>]]>
      
    </content>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2004://1.4192-comment:35371</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2004://1.4192" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/kill_blog.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/kill_blog.php#c35371" />
    <title>Comment from quanta on 2004-04-04</title>
    <author>
        <name>quanta</name>
        <uri>http://www.silentblue.net</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.silentblue.net">
        <![CDATA[<p>"Blog" is a quick, easy to remember word. It's not going anywhere.</p>

<p>Although, it never ceases to amaze me how people affix catchy monikers to mudane concepts. When I first heard about blogs, people were gushing about how it was "the next WWW", whatever that means.</p>

<p>I was surprised to later find out blogs are just online diaries. The real stars of the show are the small CMSs that appeared to accomodate this phenomenon.</p>

<p>(This is also why when people say "blog", they think of angst-ridden preteens writing non-rhyming poetry in LiveJournal)</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2004-04-04T18:40:16Z</published>
  </entry>

</feed>