<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" 
      xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/more_on_topicsh.php" />
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/atom.xml" />
  <id>tag:,2008:/1/tag:72.47.210.69,2004://1.4210-</id>
  <updated>2008-08-07T05:13:21Z</updated>
  <title>Comments for More on Topic-Sharing Community</title>
  
  <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 4.1</generator>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2004://1.4210</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/more_on_topicsh.php" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=4210" title="More on Topic-Sharing Community" />
    <published>2004-05-20T16:52:28Z</published>
    <updated>2007-12-16T23:15:32Z</updated>
    <title>More on Topic-Sharing Community</title>
    <summary>There&apos;s already been a great response to my post last night (see the comments to previous entry). Greg suggested his aggregator Blogdigger could be included in this - I agree! Matt and Andrew also posted very thoughtful responses. Here&apos;s some of my feedback (copied from the comments - I must get these enabled inline...): Overnight...</summary>
    <author>
      <name>Richard MacManus</name>
      <uri>http://www.readwriteweb.com</uri>
    </author>
    
    <category term="Info Architecture" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.readwriteweb.com/">
      <![CDATA[<p>There's already been a great response to <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/001876.html">my post last night</a> (see the comments to previous entry). <a href="http://www.blogdigger.com/blog/index.html">Greg</a> suggested his aggregator <a href="http://www.blogdigger.com/">Blogdigger</a> could be included in this - I agree! <a href="http://matt.blogs.it/">Matt</a> and <a href="http://www.andrewsw.com/news/index.php">Andrew</a> also posted very thoughtful responses.</p>
<p>Here's some of my feedback (copied from the comments - I must get these enabled inline...):</p>
<p>Overnight while pondering my post (which I regard as just a 'starter for 10' btw, not a final solution by any means), I did conclude that KC essentially already does what I describe - polls registered RSS feeds with ENT in them and aggregates them. It would be great if TE also had that functionality.</p> 
<p>It's the client ping that I think is unnecessary and possibly holding back community uptake - with TE the ping is a manual process for the blogger, and with KC you need to install an add-on tool to enable the pinging. Both require too much manual effort for the blogger (IMHO of course). eg Bloglines does all its aggregation automatically (every hour I think), with no pinging required from the blogger.</p> 
<p>Although Andrew I take your point about bandwidth utilization. But if Bloglines (and Blogdigger) can do it, why not KC and TE?</p>]]>
      
    </content>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2004://1.4210-comment:35419</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2004://1.4210" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/more_on_topicsh.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/more_on_topicsh.php#c35419" />
    <title>Comment from Andrew on 2004-05-19</title>
    <author>
        <name>Andrew</name>
        <uri>http://www.andrewsw.com/news/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.andrewsw.com/news/">
        <![CDATA[<p>You could use Javascript to cause a pseudo-ping whenever the page is loaded, but this could potentially overload the topic server, and also, if everyone uses RSS feeds, it might never get activated either.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2004-05-19T21:28:58Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2004://1.4210-comment:35420</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2004://1.4210" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/more_on_topicsh.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/more_on_topicsh.php#c35420" />
    <title>Comment from Andrew on 2004-05-23</title>
    <author>
        <name>Andrew</name>
        <uri>http://www.andrewsw.com/news/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.andrewsw.com/news/">
        <![CDATA[<p>You might want to consider advocating the use of something like Ping-o-matic (info at <a href="http://pingomatic.com/about/" rel="nofollow"><a href="http://pingomatic.com/about/" rel="nofollow">http://pingomatic.com/about/</a></a> ) which could serve as a nice substitute for pinging weblogs.com and which, if you could get to support pinging the various topics aggregators as well, could resolve that in one fell swoop.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2004-05-23T20:57:50Z</published>
  </entry>

</feed>