<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" 
      xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/semantic_web_is.php" />
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/atom.xml" />
  <id>tag:,2009:/1/tag:72.47.210.69,2004://1.4275-</id>
  <updated></updated>
  <title>Comments for Semantic Web is a Program</title>
  
  <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 4.23-en</generator>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2004://1.4275</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/semantic_web_is.php" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=4275" title="Semantic Web is a Program" />
    <published>2004-09-28T16:25:45Z</published>
    <updated>2007-12-16T23:15:35Z</updated>
    <title>Semantic Web is a Program</title>
    <summary>Slashdot pointed to a new Tim Berners-Lee interview about the Semantic Web. While on face value it&apos;s YASWI by Sir Tim (Yet Another Semantic Web Interview), there are some great quotes in this one...</summary>
    <author>
      <name>Richard MacManus</name>
      <uri>http://www.readwriteweb.com</uri>
    </author>
    
    <category term="Two Way Web" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.readwriteweb.com/">
      <![CDATA[<p><a href="http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=04/09/27/1635257">Slashdot</a> pointed to <a href="http://www.technologyreview.com/articles/04/10/frauenfelder1004.asp">a new Tim Berners-Lee interview</a> about the Semantic Web. While on face value it's <b>YASWI</b> by Sir Tim (Yet Another Semantic Web Interview), there are some great quotes in this one. e.g.</p>

<p>When asked if the Semantic Web is just a way to automate things that a human would do, Sir Tim replied:</p>

<p class="quote">"This is more like giving you a program which can do all the things which your MIS department could write programs to do but doesnít have time to. <b>But it is still a program. Just as the World Wide Web is still a document.</b>"<br />
(emphasis mine)</p>

<p>That's an important point - just as <a href="http://www.digital-web.com/articles/the_evolution_of_corporate_web_sites/">Amazon can be said</a> to be more a virtual agent than a website nowadays, the Semantic Web is a dynamic program not a static document. The generation of the Web we're in now is almost a <i>living</i> one - it's about movement and application of information. If not quite living, certainly information on the Web is much more <i>social</i> than it was 5 or 10 years ago. It's being used by people to connect with each other on a grander scale than even <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ted_Nelson">Ted Nelson</a> ever dreamed.</p>

<p>Sir Tim goes on to say:</p>

<p class="quote">"Bit by bit, link by link, the data becomes connected, interwoven. The exciting thing is serendipitous reuse of data: one person puts data up there for one thing, and another person uses it another way."</p>

<p>Again, it's the <i>usage</i> of information that is key to Sir Tim's vision of the Semantic Web.</p>

<p>The next bit that caught my eye is something that will make <a href="http://marc.blogs.it/">Marc Canter</a> fall off his chair with joy. Sir Tim mentioned FOAF as an example of a Semantic Web application:</p>

<p class="quote">"If you want to play with the Semantic Web, you can make a friend-of-a-friend file. In a FOAF file [the data component of a personal home page, formatted in a standardized way], you can publish stuff about yourself, your organization, your publication, places, or photographs."</p>

<p>Sir Tim says that FOAF "shows the power of the reuse of information".</p>

<p>And to wrap up, take this quote:</p>

<p class="quote">"The Semantic Web is just <b>the application of weblike design to data</b>; it will be many more decades before we will be able to say we have really implemented the Web idea in the full, if ever we can."<br />
(emphasis mine)</p>

<p>That's something my friends in the Web Design community will appreciate. Nowadays it's not just about designing a beautiful website, it's about designing for re-use of information. In a way, that's what people are already doing with RSS - designing with data.</p>]]>
      
    </content>
  </entry>

</feed>