<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" 
      xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/cutups_of_my_to.php" />
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/atom.xml" />
  <id>tag:,2009:/1/tag:72.47.210.69,2004://1.4315-</id>
  <updated></updated>
  <title>Comments for Cut-ups of my Top 10 posts of 2004</title>
  
  <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 4.23-en</generator>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2004://1.4315</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/cutups_of_my_to.php" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=4315" title="Cut-ups of my Top 10 posts of 2004" />
    <published>2004-12-09T19:28:07Z</published>
    <updated>2007-12-16T23:15:37Z</updated>
    <title>Cut-ups of my Top 10 posts of 2004</title>
    <summary>I thought it would be interesting to take my 10 most-visited posts of 2004 (as
listed in my previous
entry) and produce some random cut-ups of the text. In a way I&apos;m applying Remix Culture theory to my own
blog... well it&apos;s a start anyway :-)</summary>
    <author>
      <name>Richard MacManus</name>
      <uri>http://www.readwriteweb.com</uri>
    </author>
    
    <category term="Writing" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.readwriteweb.com/">
      <![CDATA[<p>Back in the early 90's I used to read <a
href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_S._Burroughs">William S. Burroughs</a> books
and for a while I was quite taken with his <a
href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cut-up_technique">"cut-up" method</a> of writing. The
cut-up technique is a specialised literary form in which a text is cut up at random and
rearranged to create a new text (ref: Wikipedia). I think this was during my Surrealism
phase. Oh, it was nothing extreme - all I did was buy the odd <a
href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dali">Salvador Dal&iacute;</a> poster, read <a
href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andre_Breton">Andr&eacute; Breton</a> books and watch
movies with French sub-titles. The usual University psuedo-intellectual postering.</p>

<p>So I thought it would be interesting to take my 10 most-visited posts of 2004 (as
listed in <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/002525.php">my previous
entry</a>) and produce some random cut-ups of the text. In a way I'm applying <a
href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/002454.php">Remix Culture</a> theory to my own
blog... well it's a start anyway :-)</p>

<p>In the interests of keeping the cut-ups brief (the top 10 posts yielded 13,300
words!), I decided to restrict them to 100 words or less.</p>

<h2>Word's Auto-Summarize Feature</h2>

<p>This is something <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/001821.php">I've
played with before</a>, inspired by <a
href="http://www.kottke.org/04/04/free-culture-100">Jason Kottke</a>. Here is the text of
all 10 of my most popular posts of 2004, in 100 words or less according to Microsoft
Word. See if you can spot any trends!</p>

<p>***start***</p>

<p>Most people thought I was nuts. Basically I believe that the Web should be organised
around topics, not people. I've read Linked by Albert-Laszlo, I'm convinced. 10 -
Personal Blogger. 100 - Social Blogger. 1000 - Community Blogger. A social publishing
tool perhaps, because I do converse with other people via my weblog.</p>

<p>"Weblog comments incite duels. Synchronicity for Bloggers</p>

<p>Especially as I not only have to convince business people, but IT people too.</p>

<p>People can produce information, subscribe to information they value, edit each others
information. Blogs vs Books?</p>

<p>I do like reading blogs, too. New Generation of Readers</p>

<p>***finish***</p>

<h2>Using a Cut-Up Machine</h2>

<p>For the next one, I firstly ran the text through the <a
href="http://web.ukonline.co.uk/gary.leeming/burroughs/cutup_machine.htm">Grazulis Cut-Up
Machine</a> (<a href="http://www.lazaruscorporation.co.uk/v4/cutup/links.php">via</a>) -
and then used Word's Auto-Summarize to reduce it down to less than 100 words.</p>

<p>***start***</p>

<p>parties made people see products - they multimedia and very people to multimedia.</p>

<p>it's people. - kinds tools</p>

<p>Synchronicity Bloggers</p>

<p>pattern - synchronicity. Today Digital Web corps?" Synchronicity for Bloggers</p>

<p>People edit each others information. Information Flow is Knowledge Management.
Literary Types</p>

<p>people I nuts. tools.</p>

<p>read discussing products WebOutliner, Lifestyle Hubbie. people doing - they a blog a
blog. People world as if Web the old old. people, sheep, herding.</p>

<p>post entitled Knowledge Writing Book a number comments. do reading too. for book mind.
like literacy, to as generation readers content consumers books. Blogs vs Books?</p>

<p>***finish***</p>

<p>I think I like the second one better. It's amazing how you can summarize a whole
year's worth of weblog posts into 100 words and spot some interesting trends. For
example, I didn't realise my literary background showed up so much in my blog writing -
but it's apparent in these two cut-ups.</p>

<p>Anyone know of any other web-based cut-up machines to try? This is fun!</p>

<p><b>UPDATE</b>: It occured to me that some readers may want to have a go at cutting up my Top 10 posts too - a la <a href="http://www.plasticbag.org/archives/2004/11/visualisations_lead_to_selfknowledge.shtml">Tom Coates' recent project</a> with his blog posts. So I offer you the entire text of my Top 10 posts of 2004, as a <b><a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/gems/rww_top10_2004.txt">Text File download</a></b> (75KB). I'm not expecting anybody to bother, but it would be cool to see what others come up with.</p>]]>
      
    </content>
  </entry>

</feed>