<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" 
      xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/mark_fletcher_b.php" />
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/atom.xml" />
  <id>tag:,2009:/1/tag:72.47.210.69,2004://1.4326-</id>
  <updated></updated>
  <title>Comments for Mark Fletcher: Boing Boing, Bloglines and Google</title>
  
  <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 4.23-en</generator>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2004://1.4326</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/mark_fletcher_b.php" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=4326" title="Mark Fletcher: Boing Boing, Bloglines and Google" />
    <published>2004-12-22T22:09:21Z</published>
    <updated>2007-12-16T23:15:38Z</updated>
    <title>Mark Fletcher: Boing Boing, Bloglines and Google</title>
    <summary>Mark Fletcher, CEO of Bloglines, wrote up a detailed response to my two
recent posts: RSS Reader Market
Share and Contextual
Adverts in Bloglines in 2005. In his post, Mark analyses Boing Boing&apos;s web stats and draws some interesting comparisons
between Google and Bloglines in regards to Boing
Boing&apos;s traffic...</summary>
    <author>
      <name>Richard MacManus</name>
      <uri>http://www.readwriteweb.com</uri>
    </author>
    
    <category term="Analysis / Strategy" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.readwriteweb.com/">
      <![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.wingedpig.com/">Mark Fletcher</a>, CEO of <a
href="http://www.bloglines.com">Bloglines</a>, wrote up <a
href="http://www.wingedpig.com/archives/000188.html">a detailed response</a> to my two
recent posts: <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/002577.php">RSS Reader Market
Share</a> and <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/002574.php">Contextual
Adverts in Bloglines in 2005</a>. In his post, Mark analyses <a
href="http://boingboing.net/">Boing Boing</a>'s <a
href="http://boingboing.net/stats/">web stats</a> and draws some interesting comparisons
between <a href="http://www.google.com">Google</a> and Bloglines in regards to Boing
Boing's traffic:</p>

<div class="quotation">
<p>"Nutshell: Bloglines is the 3rd largest source of referring pageviews on BoingBoing,
and the largest generator of referring hits to BoingBoing content, larger than Yahoo! and
Google -- and all other search engines -- combined. Bloglines generates 30% of all
referring hits to BoingBoing."</p>
</div>

<p>I think basically he is making two points:</p>

<p>1) <i>"Bloglines is the 3rd largest source of referring pageviews on BoingBoing"</i>
--&gt; meaning Bloglines is now boxing in the Web's Heavyweight division, with Search
giants Google and <a href="http://www.yahoo.com">Yahoo</a>, in regards to <b>straight
referrals to Boing Boing</b>.</p>

<p>2) <i>"...and the largest generator of referring hits to BoingBoing content"</i>
--&gt; meaning <b>more people are reading Boing Boing via Bloglines</b> than via any
other single method (including landing on Boing Boing's site via Google or indeed all the
search engines combined). At least, that's what I take from Mark's claim that "Bloglines
audience share is 2.7x larger than Google's in the number of overall impressions." I hope
I've interpreted that correctly.</p>

<p>What does all this mean? At the high level, Mark seems to be suggesting that RSS is
the number one <i>delivery method</i> for Boing Boing's content and that Bloglines is the
number one <i>deliverer.</i> And I mean 'delivery' in the wider context of not just
referrals to the Boing Boing website, but people reading Boing Boing's content via
RSS.</p>

<p>There are other insights in Mark's post too, so it's well worth reading!</p>]]>
      
    </content>
  </entry>

</feed>