<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" 
      xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/top_24_of_2004.php" />
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/atom.xml" />
  <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2011:/1/tag:72.47.210.69,2004://1.4314-</id>
  <updated></updated>
  <title>Comments for Top 24 of 2004</title>
  
  <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 4.35-en</generator>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2004://1.4314</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/top_24_of_2004.php" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=4314" title="Top 24 of 2004" />
    <published>2004-12-08T06:16:06Z</published>
    <updated>2007-12-16T23:15:37Z</updated>
    <title>Top 24 of 2004</title>
    <summary>There&apos;s a nice meme just started, asking people to list their Top 24 posts of 2004 (via). I
decided to check out my web stats and dig out the most-visited posts of 2004 for
Read/Write Web. They may not necessarily be &quot;the best&quot; posts in terms of quality, but the
people have spoken and the following posts were the most popular. Actually a lot of my
favourites did make it to the list, which is great. A few odd ones too, that I wouldn&apos;t
have picked...</summary>
    <author>
      <name>Richard MacManus</name>
      <uri>http://www.readwriteweb.com</uri>
    </author>
    
    <category term="Blogging" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.readwriteweb.com/">
      <![CDATA[<p>There's a nice meme just started, asking people to list their <a
href="http://apennyfor.com/top24/">Top 24 posts of 2004</a> (<a
href="http://www.ensight.org/archives/2004/12/06/top-24-posts-of-2004/">via</a>). I
decided to check out my web stats and dig out the most-visited posts of 2004 for
Read/Write Web. They may not necessarily be "the best" posts in terms of quality, but the
people have spoken and the following posts were the most popular. Actually a lot of my
favourites did make it to the list, which is great. A few odd ones too, that I wouldn't
have picked.&nbsp;</p>

<p>Here is my top of the pops for 2004:</p>

<p>1. <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/001818.php">Interview with Marc
Canter</a><br />
<br />
2. <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/001790.php">The Fractal
Blogosphere</a><br />
<br />
3. <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/001812.php">There is no End
User</a><br />
<br />
4. <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/001902.php">Weblogs as Avatars: some
thoughts</a><br />
<br />
5. <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/001990.php">Knowledge Management for
Generation Y</a><br />
<br />
6. <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/002039.php">Analysing Bloglines
Subscriber Stats</a><br />
<br />
7. <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/001794.php">Internal Corporate
Blogging</a>&nbsp;<br />
<br />
8. <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/001937.php">A Theory of Synchronicity
for the Web</a><br />
<br />
9. <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/001806.php">Information Flow</a><br />
<br />
10. <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/002083.php">A New Kind of
Literacy</a><br />
<br />
11. <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/001789.php">Fractal Web applied to
Blogging</a><br />
<br />
12. <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/001862.php">Reaching for the Golden
Ring (or Getting Paid)</a><br />
<br />
13. <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/002098.php">Multimedia
Blogging</a><br />
<br />
14. <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/001978.php">Mama don't let your baby
grow up to be a Generalist</a><br />
<br />
15. <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/002040.php">We're all on the same
page</a><br />
<br />
16. <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/001928.php">Stasis and
Synchronicity</a><br />
<br />
17. <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/002086.php">Reliance</a><br />
<br />
18. <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/002081.php">Notes on Tim O'Reilly's
Oscon 2004 speech</a><br />
<br />
19. <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/001996.php">Quick thoughts on Kottke's
Re-Design</a><br />
<br />
20. <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/001946.php">Knowledge Management in the
Real World</a></p>

<p>NB: I interrupt the list there, because turns out there's nothing after early August -
not even the Slashdotted <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/002378.php">Lucas
Gonze interview</a> in October. That surprises me, but I guess it goes to show how much
extra traffic Google brings for a blog post in the months following its publication. So
to make up for the lack of recent stuff, to finish my Top 24 list here are 4 of my
favourite posts from September-November 2004:</p>

<p>* <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/002291.php">Why Yahoo! + RSS = Good
Thing</a></p>

<p>* <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/002335.php">Content Renaissance On The
Web</a></p>

<p>* <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/002454.php">Tim O'Reilly
Interview</a></p>

<p>* <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/002477.php">Branding
Microcontent</a></p>

<p>There you have it, those are my most popular posts of 2004! I'd love to read other
peoples lists. It's a good way to get to know a blogger's interests and themes. Plus, for the
writer, it's a handy way to build up a recommendation list for new readers.</p>]]>
      
    </content>
  </entry>

</feed>
