<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" 
      xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/on_storyfeeding.php" />
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/atom.xml" />
  <id>tag:,2008:/1/tag:72.47.210.69,2005://1.4331-</id>
  <updated>2008-08-22T19:09:43Z</updated>
  <title>Comments for On story-feeding and lack of kick-ass post</title>
  
  <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 4.1</generator>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2005://1.4331</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/on_storyfeeding.php" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=4331" title="On story-feeding and lack of kick-ass post" />
    <published>2005-01-01T18:20:51Z</published>
    <updated>2007-12-16T23:15:38Z</updated>
    <title>On story-feeding and lack of kick-ass post</title>
    <summary>Time for my weekly plug for my sponsors Marqui.
I&apos;ve been following what the other
paid bloggers are doing and a lot of them are writing up the stories that are being
&quot;fed&quot; to us. That&apos;s a sensible tactic, so I feel a bit guilty for not going with the flow
and doing the same...</summary>
    <author>
      <name>Richard MacManus</name>
      <uri>http://www.readwriteweb.com</uri>
    </author>
    
    <category term="Sponsorships" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.readwriteweb.com/">
      <![CDATA[<p>Time for my weekly plug for my sponsors <a href="http://www.marqui.com">Marqui</a>.
I've been following what the <a
href="http://www.marqui.com/Paybloggers/Bloggers_who_are_Currently_Active.aspx">other
paid bloggers</a> are doing and a lot of them are writing up the stories that are being
"fed" to us. That's a sensible tactic, so I feel a bit guilty for not going with the flow
and doing the same. But I'm one of those strange people who does not like social pressure
to do things, even when it's in my best interests. Note that it is only a 'social'
pressure, because we're not contractually obligated to write about the stories being fed
to us.</p>

<p>I appreciate Marqui's openness and their generous sponsorship arrangement, but so far
I have no firm feelings either way about the Marqui product. I said at the start that I'd
analyze the product, but for a number of reasons I haven't fully test-drived it yet. One
is that there are too many technical details missing - particularly regarding how to
implement it and how things connect together. Sure I could take the demo for a spin, but
what I really want to do is have a nosy under the hood. Maybe one of their techies will
open up that hood in <a href="http://blog.marqui.com/">their new blog</a>. Another reason
is that I don't want to just list features and regurgitate case studies - I want to have
an 'angle' that will interest my readers.&nbsp;</p>

<p>OK those are all just excuses for my laziness... Marqui does seem like a decent enough
product and its target audience of marketing people <i>is</i> looking for an easy-to-use
and multi-channel communications product, which Marqui advertises itself as. But as <a
href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/002609.php">my previous post</a> indicates, I
get emotionally attached to (and therefore write about) innovative Web 2.0 products and
services like Flickr, del.icio.us, Bloglines, Feedburner, PubSub, etc. Marqui isn't one
of those kinds of products - deliberately so, because it's not aimed at geeks like me.
It's aimed at marketing people, who just want an easy way to issue press releases on the
Web.&nbsp;</p>

<p>Now then - coming up there is potentially a topic for me to get my teeth into. There's
a Web 2.0 angle <a
href="http://www.marqui.com/Paybloggers/Stories_Were_Feeding_Bloggers.aspx">on the
agenda</a> in the Marqui program. So when that gets injected into the mix by the Marqui
story-feeders, maybe I will finally get my A into G. I know Marc Canter is probably
waiting for me to write up something about Web 2.0 (because I didn't rate a mention in <a
href="http://marc.blogs.it/archives/2004/12/blogging_and_di.html">Marc's review so far of the paid bloggers</a>). So Marc, I promise you that I will write a kick-ass post
soon :-)</p>

<p><i>Disclosure: I mentioned and linked to Marqui as part of my sponsorship arrangement
with them. See <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/002568.php">here</a> for
details.</i></p>]]>
      
    </content>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2005://1.4331-comment:35685</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2005://1.4331" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/on_storyfeeding.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/on_storyfeeding.php#c35685" />
    <title>Comment from richard on 2005-01-02</title>
    <author>
        <name>richard</name>
        <uri>http://foo.ca/wp</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://foo.ca/wp">
        <![CDATA[<p>The odd thing is that I end up feeling guilty for writing about the fed stories at all. It feels like a cop out, like I'd be advertising for them on their terms.  This latest story feed I was going to ignore entirely, as "SEO" isn't something that I care for... I find it is often used in highly questionable ways that are little different from spamming.</p>

<p>However, Robin's piece pushed me to reply... it was a really good take on the situation.</p>

<p>Anyhow, all I wanted to say is that following their story leads isn't a requirement - it's an option if you can't think of something else to talk about...</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2005-01-02T13:40:19Z</published>
  </entry>

</feed>