| Username | Score |
| ricmac | 15 |
| notmuch | 4 |
| owen | 3 |
| fpgibson | 3 |
| magnetbox | 2 |
| mshook | 2 |
| bokardo | 2 |
| m040601 | 2 |
| zby | 2 |
| toby | 2 |
| sco | 2 |
| rpan | 2 |
| shaghaghi | 2 |
| angusf | 1 |
| toffer | 1 |
| ssoriche | 1 |
| steevc | 1 |
| dlc | 1 |
| rafaspol | 1 |
| Hybernaut | 1 |
| Glutnix | 1 |
| site9 | 1 |
| Linkorama | 1 |
| huixing | 1 |
| jkstyle | 1 |
| magallanes1234 | 1 |
| gregg | 1 |
| omit35 | 1 |
| mort | 1 |
| bobperl | 1 |
| vielmetti | 1 |
| sebpaquet | 1 |
| afongen | 1 |
| ceesaxp | 1 |
| OnTask | 1 |
| phytar | 1 |
| pc4media | 1 |
| engel5 | 1 |
| hansv | 1 |
| mymarkup | 1 |
| mediaeater | 1 |
| mattharman | 1 |
| prashantrane | 1 |
| sergee | 1 |
| RebeccaMacK | 1 |
| windalf | 1 |
| lena | 1 |
| vdm | 1 |
| TomC | 1 |
| bkerr | 1 |
| ryansking | 1 |
| crankin | 1 |
| manasgarg | 1 |
| fogfish | 1 |
| tiberus | 1 |
| Preoccupations | 1 |
| cmillward | 1 |
| fritz | 1 |
| tdw | 1 |
| bushwald | 1 |
| dblinks | 1 |
| jamesmorrison | 1 |
| kemar | 1 |
| mjs | 1 |
| kayodeok | 1 |
| nrb210 | 1 |
| 50quid | 1 |
| readwriteweb | 1 |
| joi_ito | 1 |
| tobias382 | 1 |
| rosa | 1 |
| adrian.cuthbert | 1 |
| djwudi | 1 |
| JoeLombardo | 1 |
| judell | 1 |
| jnduffie | 1 |
| litwack | 1 |
| exois | 1 |
| joaom | 1 |
| pbackx | 1 |
I think one bias to this system is that the more popular a link is, then the more people will link to it, and thus it'll likely generate a higher score on your list. There'll also be more people on your list, the more you link to popular items. On the other hand, a high score could flag a person who shares the same niche interests as you - which is what Alf's script hopes to eek out. You'll need to click through to each person to find out.
The fact that only four people scored above 2 on my list (and one of them is me!) indicates that I don't generally link to popular items. Either that, or I'm very fast on the uptake - which I know is not true!
Take a look at this list for a delicious user called acidzebra, to see the difference.
| Username | Score |
| angusf | 12 |
| kof2002 | 10 |
| notmuch | 8 |
| m040601 | 8 |
| owen | 8 |
| breyten | 6 |
| yerfatma | 6 |
| bibi | 6 |
| kohbx | 6 |
| ews | 5 |
| mshook | 5 |
| aksim | 5 |
| devzero | 5 |
| dionidium | 5 |
| casey.marshall | 5 |
| Hybernaut | 5 |
| studavis | 5 |
| ubi.quito.us | 4 |
| maxr | 4 |
| magnetbox | 4 |
| Preoccupations | 4 |
| seyd | 4 |
| payne | 4 |
| mumble | 4 |
| ravee_27 | 4 |
| marcus | 4 |
| upwind | 4 |
| spidermm | 4 |
| hrheingold | 4 |
| alexanderbecker | 4 |
| beelerspace | 4 |
| imao | 4 |
| kings | 3 |
| roberto | 3 |
| xiombarg | 3 |
| huixing | 3 |
| felipelb | 3 |
| wizzro | 3 |
| crysflame | 3 |
| shaheenb | 3 |
| spike | 3 |
| humhod | 3 |
| kevross7 | 3 |
| revgeorge | 3 |
| leinster | 3 |
| dinopixel | 3 |
| akcionar | 3 |
| paulr00001 | 3 |
| cda | 3 |
| joshua | 3 |
| jennycheuk | 3 |
| ritilan | 3 |
| bk | 3 |
| rstones | 3 |
| fncll | 3 |
| daniel | 3 |
| slackorama | 3 |
| sturob | 3 |
| kendrick | 3 |
| beatnique | 3 |
| ssoriche | 3 |
| rickduarte | 3 |
| mwiik | 3 |
| DVCBigGun | 3 |
| pepgma | 3 |
| antifuchs | 3 |
| adamhill | 3 |
| enki | 3 |
| dropshadows | 3 |
| webleon | 3 |
| breeen | 3 |
| tonetheman | 3 |
| n0wak | 3 |
| doktor | 2 |
[...plus a heap of others with score of 2 or less]
Postscript, 4/2/05: I lost the last two paragraphs of this post, because MT couldn't handle the length of it. But what I had written was that if you check out acidzebra's delicious page, you'll see that it includes a lot of items with 100+ links (the deeper the red of the highlights, the more popular an item is). So this I think accounts for the relative high scores on his Gatherers list, as well as its length.
]]>