<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" 
      xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/flickr_ceo_talk.php" />
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/atom.xml" />
  <id>tag:,2009:/1/tag:72.47.210.69,2005://1.4354-</id>
  <updated>2009-11-23T20:01:01Z</updated>
  <title>Comments for Flickr CEO talks about Google threat</title>
  
  <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 4.23-en</generator>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2005://1.4354</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/flickr_ceo_talk.php" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=4354" title="Flickr CEO talks about Google threat" />
    <published>2005-02-05T16:43:17Z</published>
    <updated>2007-12-16T23:15:39Z</updated>
    <title>Flickr CEO talks about Google threat</title>
    <summary>Flickr CEO Stewart Butterfield on whether Google will replicate Flickr&apos;s photo-sharing service...</summary>
    <author>
      <name>Richard MacManus</name>
      <uri>http://www.readwriteweb.com</uri>
    </author>
    
    <category term="Analysis / Strategy" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.readwriteweb.com/">
      <![CDATA[<p>Richard Koman over at SiliconValleyWatcher <a
href="http://www.siliconvalleywatcher.com/mt/archives/2005/02/flickr_forward.php#more">gets
the scoop</a> from <a href="http://www.flickr.com">Flickr</a> CEO <a
href="http://www.sylloge.com/personal/">Stewart Butterfield</a>, on whether Google will
replicate Flickr's photo-sharing service (as suggested by <a
href="http://www.gigaom.com/2005/02/01/a-fading-flickr/">Om Malik</a>). Stewart is quoted
as saying:</p>

<div class="quotation">
<p>"Given our growth, the technologies cooking in the lab, and that we're still
completing the feature set and infrastructure build out for version 1.0, I'm not worried
about the future.</p>

<p>I don't think Google can or would want to simply replicate anything. They are pretty
obsessive about the details -- Gmail took two years in development -- and they like to do
things their own way. As their evolution from search engine to ad network + portal
continues I think they become easier to compete with in areas outside their core."</p></div>

<p>And Richard Koman adds:</p>

<div class="quotation"><p>"It's worth noting that Om received a flood of Flickr love in response to his post,
which tells you something about the value of building brand from the ground up."</p>
</div>

<p>Lately there's been <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/002639.php">a
lot</a> of speculation about whether the smaller Web 2.0 companies (e.g. Flickr,
Bloglines, Feedburner, SixApart) will be able to foot it with the BigCo's (e.g. Google,
Yahoo, Microsoft, Amazon). Many people think the smaller companies will be acquired by
the big co's - and this is actually <a
href="http://www.themediadrop.com/archives/000342.php">a viable strategy</a> for a
smaller company - or be squashed by them. So it's refreshing to see one of the smaller
company honchos come out and say: hey, we're not afraid of competing with Google.</p>

<p>One can't read too much into Stewart's response - it sounds pretty guarded and
open-ended as to their future plans. Once they complete version 1.0, they may then be
prepared to sell it to the likes of Google or Yahoo or Microsoft - who's to say? But I
like that Stewart emphasizes that Flickr is best in its class <b>in its niche</b>, whereas Google is spreading itself over a number of niches these days. Good fighting talk
;-)</p>

<p>Flickr has built up a lot of <a
href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whuffie">whuffie</a>, so that bottom-up market
evolution may well be their saving grace when or if Google enters the photo-sharing
market. And no I don't count Google's <a href="http://picasa2.blogspot.com/">Picasa2</a> as being in the same ballgame as
Flickr...yet.</p>]]>
      
    </content>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2005://1.4354-comment:35718</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2005://1.4354" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/flickr_ceo_talk.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/flickr_ceo_talk.php#c35718" />
    <title>Comment from Richard Koman on 2005-02-05</title>
    <author>
        <name>Richard Koman</name>
        <uri>http://richardkoman.typepad.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://richardkoman.typepad.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>A slight correction: The first two paragraphs of the quote are Stewart's. The third paragraph was actually my commentary. </p>

<p>There's certainly a lot of speculation about Google/Yahoo/etc buying one of these small companies to get into the blog game. It's certainly only a matter of time until something happens but it won't necessarily be a good thing when it does. While google pulled blogger's fat out of the fire by acquiring them, they haven't shown much interest in keeping it competitive with Six Apart.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2005-02-06T00:25:22Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2005://1.4354-comment:35719</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2005://1.4354" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/flickr_ceo_talk.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/flickr_ceo_talk.php#c35719" />
    <title>Comment from Richard MacManus on 2005-02-05</title>
    <author>
        <name>Richard MacManus</name>
        <uri>http://www.readwriteweb.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.readwriteweb.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the correction Richard, I've fixed that up now.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2005-02-06T04:08:18Z</published>
  </entry>

</feed>