<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" 
      xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/20_news.php" />
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/atom.xml" />
  <id>tag:,2008:/1/tag:72.47.210.69,2005://1.4416-</id>
  <updated>2008-09-24T12:28:05Z</updated>
  <title>Comments for 2.0 News</title>
  
  <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 4.1</generator>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2005://1.4416</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/20_news.php" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=4416" title="2.0 News" />
    <published>2005-05-03T22:53:37Z</published>
    <updated>2007-12-16T23:15:42Z</updated>
    <title>2.0 News</title>
    <summary>I&apos;m trying again with a branded daily update of Web 2.0 news and
views. And not content with cornering the &quot;Web 2.0&quot; niche in blogs, I&apos;m now making a play
for the term &quot;2.0&quot; ;-)</summary>
    <author>
      <name>Richard MacManus</name>
      <uri>http://www.readwriteweb.com</uri>
    </author>
    
    <category term="Web 2.0 News" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.readwriteweb.com/">
      <![CDATA[<p><img class="newsimage" alt="web20_news.gif" src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/web20_news.gif"
width="66" height="46" />I'm trying again with a branded daily update of Web 2.0 news and
views. Not content with cornering the "Web 2.0" niche in blogs, I'm now making a play
for the term "2.0" ;-) Let me know what you think of the new format.</p>

<h2>Backpack:
Web 2.0 Email?</h2>

<p>Popular Web Design firm 37signals has <a
href="http://37signals.com/svn/archives2/backpack_preview_3_web_10_calling_web_20.php">announced a new email-to-web product</a>. They're
promoting it as a kind of Web 2.0 makeover to "the star of Web 1.0" - email. So what does
Backpack do? Apparently it will receive an email and "turn it into something useful on
the web" - in other words, it'll transform an email into a functional web page.&nbsp;</p>

<p>I have to admit, this sounds really cool and something I can picture myself using.
Practically speaking, I already use <a href="http://gmail.google.com">Gmail</a> as a 'To
Do List' and to keep track of projects I'm involved in. Gmail's ability to label emails
and search them, together with a highly interactive interface and huge storage, has
turned out to be of immense use to me.&nbsp;</p>

<p>Hmmm. I'm not sure at this stage whether Backpack would be a competitor to Gmail, or a
complimentary product?</p>

<h2>Peak inside Longhorn</h2>

<p><a
href="http://www.pcmag.com/slideshow_viewer/0,2393,l=150617&amp;p=1&amp;s=26945&amp;a=150625&amp;po=1&amp;i=1,00.asp">PCMag.com has screenshots of Longhorn</a>, Microsoft's next-generation Windows (via <a href="http://www.waxy.org/links/">waxy.org's fabulous linkblog</a>). Of most interest
to Web 2.0 fans will be how they've integrated the browser and search, the two core Web
interfaces. <a
href="http://www.pcmag.com/slideshow_viewer/0,2393,l=150617&amp;s=26945&amp;a=150625&amp;po=8,00.asp">
The final screenshot</a> shows Internet Explorer and to be honest the only real
difference I noticed was a search bar in the top-right - presumably the same search that
will be integrated into the core Longhorn OS. That's potentially a threat to Google of
course (no surprises there).</p>

<h2>Google
after Quality not Quantity</h2>

<p><a
href="http://www.newscientist.com/article.ns?id=mg18624975.900&amp;print=true">NewScientist reports</a> that Google plans to "dramatically improve the results of
internet news searches, by ranking them according to quality rather than simply by their
date and relevance to search terms." What worries me is that most of the values to be
measured are suspiciously <b><i>quantity</i></b>-based: e.g. number of stories, average
story length, number with bylines, number bureaux cited, how long they have been in
business, number of staff, volume of internet traffic.</p>

<p>Um hello - what about niche sites and bloggers?</p>

<h2>Were those the golden years?</h2>

<p><a
href="http://www.thebishop.net/geodog/archives/2005/04/28/were_those_the_golden_years.html">Geodog gets misty-eyed</a> about pre-Web 2.0, before the hype and money.</p>

<h2>It's A Whole New (No
It's Not) Internet</h2>

<p><a href="http://notes.torrez.org/2005/04/its_a_whole_new.html">Counterpoint</a> to the <a
href="http://www.adaptivepath.com/publications/essays/archives/000430.php">Adaptive Path
article</a>. For me, the great thing about Web 2.0 is <b>how many</b> great ideas are
being executed. A financially healthy environment begets more of those ideas - don't you
think?</p>]]>
      
    </content>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2005://1.4416-comment:35846</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2005://1.4416" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/20_news.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/20_news.php#c35846" />
    <title>Comment from Richard MacManus on 2005-05-03</title>
    <author>
        <name>Richard MacManus</name>
        <uri>http://www.readwriteweb.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.readwriteweb.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>Brevity Richard, must try and be more blog-like. Trouble is, I'm a Long-Form writer by nature. Will keep trying :-)</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2005-05-03T23:37:10Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2005://1.4416-comment:35847</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2005://1.4416" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/20_news.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/20_news.php#c35847" />
    <title>Comment from a on 2005-05-04</title>
    <author>
        <name>a</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Backpack is not be a competitor with gmail. It's not an email client. It would work well along with Gmail though.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2005-05-04T09:02:51Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2005://1.4416-comment:35848</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2005://1.4416" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/20_news.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/20_news.php#c35848" />
    <title>Comment from Richard MacManus on 2005-05-04</title>
    <author>
        <name>Richard MacManus</name>
        <uri>http://www.readwriteweb.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.readwriteweb.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>"a", I never said Backpack was an email client. I suggested it could have similar *functionality*.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2005-05-04T15:55:53Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2005://1.4416-comment:35849</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2005://1.4416" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/20_news.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/20_news.php#c35849" />
    <title>Comment from Andrew on 2005-05-07</title>
    <author>
        <name>Andrew</name>
        <uri>http://www.andrewsw.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.andrewsw.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>Your comment "the only real difference I noticed was a search bar in the top-right" reminded me of:</p>

<p><a href="http://www.apple.com/macosx/features/spotlight/" rel="nofollow"><a href="http://www.apple.com/macosx/features/spotlight/" rel="nofollow">http://www.apple.com/macosx/features/spotlight/</a></a></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2005-05-07T13:02:56Z</published>
  </entry>

</feed>