<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" 
      xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/healthcare_in_w.php" />
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/atom.xml" />
  <id>tag:,2009:/1/tag:72.47.210.69,2005://1.4420-</id>
  <updated></updated>
  <title>Comments for Healthcare in Web 2.0</title>
  
  <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 4.23-en</generator>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2005://1.4420</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/healthcare_in_w.php" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=4420" title="Healthcare in Web 2.0" />
    <published>2005-05-05T21:24:49Z</published>
    <updated>2007-12-16T23:15:42Z</updated>
    <title>Healthcare in Web 2.0</title>
    <summary>Web 2.0 is on its way for consumer medical information services...</summary>
    <author>
      <name>Richard MacManus</name>
      <uri>http://www.readwriteweb.com</uri>
    </author>
    
    <category term="Web 2.0 News" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.readwriteweb.com/">
      <![CDATA[<p><img class="newsimage" alt="Web 2.0 News"
src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/web20_news.gif" width="66" height="46" />Web 2.0 is coming soon to consumer medical information services, <a
href="http://gould.weblogsinc.com/entry/1234000770042071/">says Gordon Gould</a>. He
reckons the most interesting apps won't come from established Web medical players, like
<a href="http://webmd.com/">WebMD</a>, but rather from startups. Gordon thinks the
established companies are too Web 1.0 - "monolithic, closed, and mostly just about
info-retrieval".&nbsp;</p>

<p><a href="http://www.webmd.com/corporate/index.html?z=1727_00000_0000_bd_05">WebMD's
mission</a> seems to be to help "navigate the complexity of the healthcare system" and so
it necessarily has a broad reach - from doctors to patients to providers. So perhaps
Gordon is right and innovation will come from presumably more focused and agile
Healthcare startups.</p>

<p><a
href="http://www.emergic.org/archives/2005/04/30/index.html#it_in_healthcare">Rajesh Jain
from Emergic</a> has a similar post about IT in the Healthcare system. He quotes from an
article in <a
href="http://www.economist.com/printedition/displayStory.cfm?Story_ID=3909439">The
Economist</a>, which says the healthcare industry must get patient information "out of
paper files and into electronic databases" and make it interoperable. But more than that,
decision-making should be moved to the edges of the network (i.e. "by patients in
consultation with their doctors") and not centralised.&nbsp;</p>

<p>The Economist's conclusion is similar to Gordon's - the goal is ultimately "to
enable individuals, at last, to have access to, and possession of, information about
their own health."</p>]]>
      
    </content>
  </entry>

</feed>