<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" 
      xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/aol_the_sleepin.php" />
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/atom.xml" />
  <id>tag:,2009:/1/tag:72.47.210.69,2005://1.4456-</id>
  <updated></updated>
  <title>Comments for AOL the sleeping giant of RSS?</title>
  
  <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 4.23-en</generator>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2005://1.4456</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/aol_the_sleepin.php" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=4456" title="AOL the sleeping giant of RSS?" />
    <published>2005-06-19T04:54:22Z</published>
    <updated>2007-12-16T23:15:44Z</updated>
    <title>AOL the sleeping giant of RSS?</title>
    <summary>Jupitermedia analyst David Card thinks AOL is preparing for a big fattie splash into the RSS pool. He says: 1. The new version of MyAOL is &quot;essentially an RSS reader&quot;, albeit not as slick as how Apple does RSS in its Safari browser. 2. &quot;AOL has a deal with Feedster to provide 7 million user-selectable...</summary>
    <author>
      <name>Richard MacManus</name>
      <uri>http://www.readwriteweb.com</uri>
    </author>
    
    <category term="RSS &amp; Feed Management" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.readwriteweb.com/">
      <![CDATA[<p><a href="http://weblogs.jupiterresearch.com/analysts/card/archives/008753.html">Jupitermedia analyst David Card</a> thinks AOL is preparing for a big fattie splash into the RSS pool. He says:</p>

<p>1. The new version of MyAOL is "essentially an RSS reader", albeit not as slick as how Apple does RSS in its Safari browser.</p>

<p>2. "AOL has a deal with Feedster to provide 7 million user-selectable feeds." (what a coup for Feedster!)</p>

<p>3. "Future plans include integrating feed lists into IM ñ think RSS playlists that incorporate presence. Think Buddyfeeds." Intriguing... sounds like a mix between <a href="http://www.aim.com">AIM</a>, <a href="http://www.LiveJournal.com">Live Journal</a> and <a href="http://www.webjay.org">Webjay</a>!</p>

<p>David then makes a big splash of his own, by stating:</p>

<p>"Shockingly, AOL is positioned to be the leader in RSS among the big portals, search engines, and Internet media companies. Gasp."</p>

<p>He's suggesting that AOL will usurp Yahoo, Google and Microsoft (and Jeeves/Bloglines?). I think he's talking in terms of sheer quantity of RSS users. Indeed David says that AOL could "teach a lot of mainstream users to use it [RSS]".</p>

<p>I don't really have an opinion on this, because here in New Zealand we don't have AOL. Still, I do know that AOL is right up there with Yahoo in terms of catering to "mainstream" users. So if they're about to promote RSS on their portal, well that's big news.</p>

<p>But interesting to read <a href="http://susanmernit.blogspot.com/2005/06/aol-on-web-david-card-comments.html">Susan Mernit's viewpoint</a> (Susan used to be an AOL executive):</p>

<p>"I share Card's skepticism...AOL is gonna have to pull more than one rabbit out of the hat to make a quick turnaround work."</p>]]>
      
    </content>
  </entry>

</feed>