<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" 
      xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/technorati_the.php" />
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/atom.xml" />
  <id>tag:,2009:/1/tag:72.47.210.69,2005://1.4474-</id>
  <updated>2009-10-30T14:53:20Z</updated>
  <title>Comments for Technorati the No.1 blog search engine according to Alexa</title>
  
  <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 4.23-en</generator>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2005://1.4474</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/technorati_the.php" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=4474" title="Technorati the No.1 blog search engine according to Alexa" />
    <published>2005-07-05T16:23:45Z</published>
    <updated>2007-12-16T23:15:45Z</updated>
    <title>Technorati the No.1 blog search engine according to Alexa</title>
    <summary>Technorati has gotten a little bit of heat recently from Marc Canter and Dave Winer, which prompted me to take a look at how Technorati stacks up against its competition in the blog search space. Hat-tip also to Josh Hallett, who pointed me to a relevant post of his the other day. Alexa is an...</summary>
    <author>
      <name>Richard MacManus</name>
      <uri>http://www.readwriteweb.com</uri>
    </author>
    
    <category term="Analysis / Strategy" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.readwriteweb.com/">
      <![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.technorati.com">Technorati</a> has gotten a little bit of heat
recently from <a href="http://marc.blogs.it/archives/2005/07/we_need_more_pr.html">Marc
Canter</a> and <a href="http://archive.scripting.com/2005/07/04#When:6:52:05AM">Dave
Winer</a>, which prompted me to take a look at how Technorati stacks up against its
competition in the blog search space. Hat-tip also to Josh Hallett, who pointed me to <a
href="http://hyku.com/blog/archives/000397.html">a relevant post of his</a> the other
day.</p>

<p><a href="http://pages.alexa.com/company/index.html">Alexa</a> is an excellent
traffic-ranking tool, owned by <a href="http://www.amazon.com">Amazon</a>. Take a look at
the following comparison graphs from Alexa - you may be surprised by the results. They
show that Technorati is growing at a rapid rate. It's recently overtaken <a
href="http://www.bloglines.com">Bloglines</a> and is blitzing <a href="http://www.feedster.com">Feedster</a>. My thoughts on
WHY are at the end of this post.</p>

<p>The graphs below are all comparisons of "daily reach", which measures the number of
users a website has. The time span I'm measuring is 1 year. So these graphs show how each
website has grown (or not) in users during the past year.</p>

<h2>Technorati vs Feedster</h2>

<p><img src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/alexa1.png"
alt="Technorati vs Feedster" /><br />
This clearly shows that a gulf has opened up between Technorati (blue line) and Feedster
(red line) since the beginning of 2005. Prior to that the two sites were relatively even,
with Technorati always slightly ahead. But now Technorati is streaking away from its main
competitor. Dave Sifry and his team will be rapt by that, but it must be a major concern
for Feedster.</p>

<h2>Technorati vs Bloglines</h2>
<p><img src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/alexa2.png"
alt="Technorati vs Bloglines" /><br />
This shows that Technorati overtook Bloglines at the beginning of June and it looks like
they may hold that lead too (judging by the sudden spike for Technorati during
June/July).</p>

<h2>Technorati vs PubSub</h2>

<p><img src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/alexa4.png"
alt="Technorati vs PubSub" /><br />
Shows that although <a href="http://www.pubsub.com">PubSub</a> are growing, it's not
nearly fast enough compared to Technorai.</p>

<h2>Bloglines vs Feedster</h2>

<p><img src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/alexa5.png"
alt="Bloglines vs Feedster" /><br />
This graph compares Bloglines to Feedster - now ranked 2 and 3 respectively in the 'blog
search' space according to Alexa. Bloglines has a healthy lead - and again it shows a
slight tailing off with Feedster.</p>

<h2>Feedster vs PubSub</h2>
<p><img src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/alexa3.png"
alt="Feedster vs PubSub" /><br />
Shows that PubSub has a bit of work to do to catch up to
Feedster and the others.</p>

<h2>Summary</h2>

<p>The usual caveats about Web stats apply - i.e. assume the data may be unreliable.
Nevertheless, the main trends here are clear:</p>

<p>1. Technorati is on a roll. I think this may be due to their recent tagging
initiatives. Bud Gibson has an interesting theory about this. In a post entitled <a
href="http://thecommunityengine.com/home/archives/2005/06/folksonomy_make.html">Folksonomy
makes tag aggregators king of search rankings</a>, Bud explained that Technorati's
aggregation of tags has resulted in high search engine rankings in Google, Overture,
etc.</p>

<p>Technorati's <a href="http://www.sifry.com/alerts/archives/000314.html">re-design</a>
and high-profile promotions, such as the recent <a
href="http://live8.technorati.com/">Live 8 one</a> which Marc referred to, have also
probably contributed to the rise of Technorati.</p>

<p>2. What's happened to Feedster? They were once neck and neck with Technorati, but
these stats show they've dropped off the pace. Maybe it's because Feedster is
focusing on different niches nowadays - e.g. they're rolling out an ambitious <a
href="http://feedster.com/feedstermedia.php">Media Network</a>, which I'm going to be
testing soon btw.</p>

<p>I really like Feedster - they recently made me their <a
href="http://feedster.com/fotd.php">Feed of the Day</a> for the second time (first time
was a couple of years ago). I'd like to see them succeed, so hopefully this is a
temporary blip on the radar in terms of their user stats.</p>

<p>There are other trends to note, but I think I'll go ahead and post this now and let
others jump in via the comments.</p>

<p><b>UPDATE, 7 July 2005:</b> Several people have left comments that the companies I chose may not necessarily have the same business models - and indeed may not be "competitors" (a word I used in my post). Chris Redlitz from Feedster also emailed me about this matter. Chris said (I have permission to quote him):</p>

<p><em>"Technorati and Feedster are fundamentally very different businesses. Feedster is focused on feed subscription, syndicated search and advertising. Many people do not search feedster.com but access us through feed subscriptions, which is not reflected on Alexa."</em></p>

<p>Fair enough and point taken. I still think the Alexa charts show some valid trends that are worth noting. But as the comments I've received highlight, it may not be a level playing field for PubSub and Feedster in particular when it comes to Alexa stats.</p> 

<p>Some people also pointed out the technical issues that Technorati has from time to time. Shelley Powers illustrated this by telling me <a href="http://weblog.burningbird.net/archives/2005/07/06/congratulations-youve-just-been-squidded/">I've been Squidded</a>. Heh.</p>]]>
      
    </content>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2005://1.4474-comment:36039</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2005://1.4474" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/technorati_the.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/technorati_the.php#c36039" />
    <title>Comment from Tony Gentile on 2005-07-05</title>
    <author>
        <name>Tony Gentile</name>
        <uri>http://www.buzzhit.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.buzzhit.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>Gotta look beyond the HTML output from these players to get a full perspective on their usage...</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2005-07-05T17:47:32Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2005://1.4474-comment:36040</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2005://1.4474" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/technorati_the.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/technorati_the.php#c36040" />
    <title>Comment from Joe Gatz on 2005-07-05</title>
    <author>
        <name>Joe Gatz</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Comparing Technorati to Pubsub doesn't make sense, because Pubsub is a subscribe model.  They send out RSS feeds to people, who see Pubsub in their feed aggregators, and only visit the Pubsub site to make a new search subscription or look at some special page on the site, but not for search purposes.  Technorati gives watchlists (similar search feeds), but also has a search page on their site for looking at old information.  So therefore people visit the site much more often.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2005-07-06T01:29:33Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2005://1.4474-comment:36041</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2005://1.4474" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/technorati_the.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/technorati_the.php#c36041" />
    <title>Comment from Richard MacManus on 2005-07-05</title>
    <author>
        <name>Richard MacManus</name>
        <uri>http://www.readwriteweb.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.readwriteweb.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>Tony and Joe, yes that's a fair point. Particularly in the case of PubSub, because - you're right - by design its business model is to deliver information to users and not have users visit it.</p>

<p>But in respect to Technorati, Feedster and Bloglines, I'd argue that the html hits are still very good measures of success. Not the only measure, of course. But certainly good enough to spot some relevant trends.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2005-07-06T04:24:17Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2005://1.4474-comment:36042</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2005://1.4474" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/technorati_the.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/technorati_the.php#c36042" />
    <title>Comment from Greg Gershman on 2005-07-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>Greg Gershman</name>
        <uri>http://www.blogdigger.com/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.blogdigger.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>In addition to reiterating the comment that Alexa is not a good measure of a sites usage (our highest traffic days don't necc. equal a high Alexa day), it would be nice to see some real evaluation of these services.  It's great that more people use something or other, but it doesn't address the issue of who's got the best coverage, best results, least spam, fastest indexing, etc.  There might just be a less-well-known player out there who's doing a better job.  Or not.  The point is, these kinds of statistics don't say much about the quality of any particular site.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2005-07-06T08:38:20Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2005://1.4474-comment:36043</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2005://1.4474" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/technorati_the.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/technorati_the.php#c36043" />
    <title>Comment from amit agarwal on 2005-07-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>amit agarwal</name>
        <uri>http://labnol.blogspot.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://labnol.blogspot.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>The new technorati is buggy.</p>

<p>I get errors most of the times when I try to see who has linked to my blog.</p>

<p><a href="http://www.technorati.com/search/labnol.blogspot.com" rel="nofollow"><a href="http://www.technorati.com/search/labnol.blogspot.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.technorati.com/search/labnol.blogspot.com</a></a></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2005-07-06T08:47:31Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2005://1.4474-comment:36044</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2005://1.4474" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/technorati_the.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/technorati_the.php#c36044" />
    <title>Comment from Randy Charles Morin on 2005-07-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>Randy Charles Morin</name>
        <uri>http://www.kbcafe.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.kbcafe.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>Technorati may be winning the war in the minds of the consumer, but all of these services are failing to meet basic quality of service expectations. Someday, Google is gonna wake up and roll over all three, by simply providing quality results.</p>

<p>The funniest thing is the reach number for PubSub.com, which believe it or not, doesn't even out-rank my personal Website (kbcafe.com). I think Bob needs to hire someone in marketing.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2005-07-06T14:47:33Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2005://1.4474-comment:36045</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2005://1.4474" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/technorati_the.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/technorati_the.php#c36045" />
    <title>Comment from Ed Rusch on 2005-07-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>Ed Rusch</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Alexa is a joke. Just look at the sites Alexa tracks and then compare them to sites where SiteMeter is being used. Steve Rubel's site, Micropersuasion, is a top 3,000 site in Alexa but averages 1,200 viewers a day. I run several sites doing between 5,000 and 10,000 viewers a day, but they end up in the 300,000 range on Alexa. Why? Because they're not tech sites, and only tech geeks use Alexa.</p>

<p>Alexa is simply a joke.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2005-07-06T15:11:41Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2005://1.4474-comment:36046</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2005://1.4474" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/technorati_the.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/technorati_the.php#c36046" />
    <title>Comment from Randy Charles Morin on 2005-07-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>Randy Charles Morin</name>
        <uri>http://www.kbcafe.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.kbcafe.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>Ed, Steve is ranked 33,865 by Alexa. Agree, Alexa is not totally accurate, nothing is, but it's a great visual tool, as Richard just showed us.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2005-07-06T15:26:33Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2005://1.4474-comment:36047</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2005://1.4474" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/technorati_the.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/technorati_the.php#c36047" />
    <title>Comment from Richard MacManus on 2005-07-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>Richard MacManus</name>
        <uri>http://www.readwriteweb.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.readwriteweb.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>I totally agree that this isn't a measure of quality. I nearly mentioned in my post that I continue to have technical issues with Technorati, whereas I find PubSub (for example) to be high quality. But I decided to focus just on the 'daily reach' trends. It's more of a popularity measure than anything else, but those things are important especially when you're trying to make a decent business of blog search/subscribe.</p>

<p>As for Alexa, I agree it's by no means perfect. But it's as good a tool as I know of to study website trends. If anyone knows of any better tools, let me know.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2005-07-06T16:01:45Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2005://1.4474-comment:36048</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2005://1.4474" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/technorati_the.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/technorati_the.php#c36048" />
    <title>Comment from pb on 2005-07-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>pb</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Alexa is not perfect (no measurement tool is). But it is pretty good and definitely good enough for performing the sort of analysis being done here.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2005-07-06T17:17:40Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2005://1.4474-comment:36049</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2005://1.4474" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/technorati_the.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/technorati_the.php#c36049" />
    <title>Comment from Anil Dash on 2005-07-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>Anil Dash</name>
        <uri>http://www.anildash.com/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.anildash.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>"But now Technorati is streaking away from its main competitor."</p>

<p>I'm curious how you're defining "competitor" for the basis of this comparison, as I'm not sure *any* of these companies have defined their business models publicly yet. That means it's hard to know who they're competing with for a customer's dollars.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2005-07-06T18:24:10Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2005://1.4474-comment:36050</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2005://1.4474" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/technorati_the.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/technorati_the.php#c36050" />
    <title>Comment from Richard MacManus on 2005-07-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>Richard MacManus</name>
        <uri>http://www.readwriteweb.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.readwriteweb.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>Generally I'm talking about the 'blog search/subscribe' space. I mentioned 'blog search engines' in the title of the post.</p>

<p>But I agree that business models are still being sorted out... maybe I should've added "Your mileage may vary" to the end of the post :-)</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2005-07-06T18:32:33Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2005://1.4474-comment:36051</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2005://1.4474" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/technorati_the.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/technorati_the.php#c36051" />
    <title>Comment from Mark Bernstein on 2005-07-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>Mark Bernstein</name>
        <uri>http://www.markbernstein.org</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.markbernstein.org">
        <![CDATA[<p>Thing is, I *visit* technorati for the features, but I *read* three feedster feeds every day.  The feedster feeds are their core business.</p>

<p>I see no particular need to visit feedster at all; I just read the feeds.  That makes me invisible to your methodology.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2005-07-06T18:32:35Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2005://1.4474-comment:36052</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2005://1.4474" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/technorati_the.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/technorati_the.php#c36052" />
    <title>Comment from Richard MacManus on 2005-07-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>Richard MacManus</name>
        <uri>http://www.readwriteweb.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.readwriteweb.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>Personally I visit Feedster as much as Technorati - I use Feedster mainly as a blog search engine.</p>

<p>But it's certainly a valid point you've made Mark.</p>

<p>Your mileage may vary.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2005-07-06T18:36:47Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2005://1.4474-comment:36053</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2005://1.4474" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/technorati_the.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/technorati_the.php#c36053" />
    <title>Comment from Hal O&apos;Brien on 2005-07-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>Hal O&apos;Brien</name>
        <uri>http://libertango.livejournal.com/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://libertango.livejournal.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>This is remarkably dense.</p>

<p>The number one blog search tool is Google.  The percentage of the marketplace who know or care what either Alexa, Technorati, Feedster, or Bloglines are is probably in the single digits.</p>

<p>Yes, I understand *you* know and care... But you're so far in the bubble, you apparently don't know the bubble exists.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2005-07-07T00:44:16Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2005://1.4474-comment:36054</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2005://1.4474" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/technorati_the.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/technorati_the.php#c36054" />
    <title>Comment from Richard MacManus on 2005-07-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>Richard MacManus</name>
        <uri>http://www.readwriteweb.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.readwriteweb.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>The number 1 search tool is Google? Why didn't anybody tell me... now I have to re-write this whole post. I feel like I've just been punk'd.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2005-07-07T03:10:31Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2005://1.4474-comment:36055</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2005://1.4474" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/technorati_the.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/technorati_the.php#c36055" />
    <title>Comment from Mark Smith on 2005-07-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>Mark Smith</name>
        <uri>http://www.dcinput.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.dcinput.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>I'm relatively new to all this but I'm not sure Hal understands the bubble.</p>

<p>My recent adventures in the blogosphere with the Nasa Deep Impact mission, how it unfolded and how I was able to participate in the riples it caused on the net while also monitoring it all using technorati and other blog search engines lead me to think that there is a world of difference  between regular search engines and the ones we are talking about here.</p>

<p>And I bet Hal doesn't even know Demi Moore.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2005-07-07T04:26:36Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2005://1.4474-comment:36056</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2005://1.4474" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/technorati_the.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/technorati_the.php#c36056" />
    <title>Comment from Hal O&apos;Brien on 2005-07-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>Hal O&apos;Brien</name>
        <uri>http://libertango.livejournal.com/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://libertango.livejournal.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Let me see if I can clarify.  Yes, Google is a glaringly obvious answer for this task.  But (he said, after searching the page in a double-check), until I mentioned them, nobody had.</p>

<p>I mean... A discussion like this is not unlike a debate over whether Zeta/Haiku/BeOS is a more capable operating system than FreeBSD.  While there are perfectly valid arguments for either position, the overwhelming majority of users simply do not care.</p>

<p>And I don't just mean end users.  I mean bloggers themselves.  The universe of bloggers is now large enough, and the proportion who use these specialized tools small enough, that I would conjecture the majority of even *bloggers* don't know these tools exist, let alone use them.</p>

<p>It's not unlike... I think it was the 1992 Presidential campaign, where Cokie Roberts was asked in New Hampshire about the 50 or so Democratic candidates past the usual 7-ish. She said they simply didn't have the resources to cover the whole field.  So she was asked, What's the criterion for the ones who *are* followed?  Answer, without apparent irony: "The ones who get coverage."</p>

<p>In the same way, making comparisons between Technorati and Feedster is basically saying they're worth paying attention to because they get a lot of attention from the "right" folks.  That's all very well, but it doesn't amount to very much in the vast real world *beyond* the "right" folks.</p>

<p>It's scholasticism.  It's inside baseball.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2005-07-07T04:37:56Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2005://1.4474-comment:36057</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2005://1.4474" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/technorati_the.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/technorati_the.php#c36057" />
    <title>Comment from Richard MacManus on 2005-07-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>Richard MacManus</name>
        <uri>http://www.readwriteweb.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.readwriteweb.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>Cokie Roberts?</p>

<p>Hal, although I see your point I think you've taken my post the wrong way. I selected a group of blog-specific search/subscribe engines (for want of a better way to describe them) and did an analysis of them. Yes, that group is selective - but not out of any snobbery on my part. I simply chose what I thought were a similar group of blog tools. </p>

<p>Yes Google is the number one search tool. But you'll notice I also didn't include Yahoo, or MSN Search, Ask Jeeves, etc. Does that mean I'm practising "scholasticism" (whatever *that* means) with them too?</p>

<p>Don't take this too seriously, it's simply a post describing some trends that I think are relevent to the blogosphere.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2005-07-07T05:38:59Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2005://1.4474-comment:36058</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2005://1.4474" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/technorati_the.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/technorati_the.php#c36058" />
    <title>Comment from Randy Charles Morin on 2005-07-07</title>
    <author>
        <name>Randy Charles Morin</name>
        <uri>http://www.kbcafe.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.kbcafe.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>Hal, you said "But (he said, after searching the page in a double-check), until I mentioned them, nobody had."</p>

<p>Your Webpage search algorithm is broken.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2005-07-07T07:28:27Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2005://1.4474-comment:36059</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2005://1.4474" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/technorati_the.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/technorati_the.php#c36059" />
    <title>Comment from John Furrier on 2005-07-07</title>
    <author>
        <name>John Furrier</name>
        <uri>http://www.podtech.net</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.podtech.net">
        <![CDATA[<p>Great post btw.  My comment is around the word 'competitors'.  This market is growing fast there really isn't competition but instead I would suggest they are all partners.  Feedster and others are trying to be completely different and do different things than Technorati.  There is plenty of 'beachhead' for this massive market that's exploding.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2005-07-07T08:35:31Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2005://1.4474-comment:36060</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2005://1.4474" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/technorati_the.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/technorati_the.php#c36060" />
    <title>Comment from Lex on 2005-07-07</title>
    <author>
        <name>Lex</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>I like Mark Cuban's IceRocket.com blog search. I think it is much better than feedster or Technorati</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2005-07-07T11:16:01Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2005://1.4474-comment:36061</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2005://1.4474" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/technorati_the.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/technorati_the.php#c36061" />
    <title>Comment from Richard MacManus on 2005-07-07</title>
    <author>
        <name>Richard MacManus</name>
        <uri>http://www.readwriteweb.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.readwriteweb.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>I've just posted an update to this post, to clarify some of the issues that have arisen in the comments. Thanks everybody for your great feedback.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2005-07-07T16:59:13Z</published>
  </entry>

</feed>