<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" 
      xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/web_20_weekly_w_24.php" />
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/atom.xml" />
  <id>tag:,2009:/1/tag:72.47.210.69,2005://1.4477-</id>
  <updated></updated>
  <title>Comments for Web 2.0 Weekly Wrap-up, 4-10 July 2005</title>
  
  <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 4.23-en</generator>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2005://1.4477</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/web_20_weekly_w_24.php" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=4477" title="Web 2.0 Weekly Wrap-up, 4-10 July 2005" />
    <published>2005-07-12T01:01:24Z</published>
    <updated>2007-12-16T23:15:46Z</updated>
    <title>Web 2.0 Weekly Wrap-up, 4-10 July 2005</title>
    <summary>This week: Big events and news on the Web, Automatic content for the people,
Things you can do with RSS, API round-up, Techie Post of the Week: Social principles of Web 2.0.</summary>
    <author>
      <name>Richard MacManus</name>
      <uri>http://www.readwriteweb.com</uri>
    </author>
    
    <category term="Web 2.0 Weekly Wrap-Ups" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.readwriteweb.com/">
      <![CDATA[<p><a href="mailto:readwriteweb@gmail.com" border="0"><img src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/rww_sponsorwanted.gif" width="400" height="70" alt="sponsor wanted" border="0" /></a></p>

<p>A bit of admin before I start. The <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/cat_web_20_weekly_wrapups.php">Web 2.0 Weekly Wrap-Up</a> is looking for a new sponsor, now that <a href="http://www.theport.com/">ThePort Network</a> has completed its sponsorship arrangement with me. Dan Backus from ThePort Network told me they had a lot of positive feedback to the sponsorship and their product offerings - which I was very pleased to hear. I want to thank Dan and ThePort Network for sponsoring me and I wish them all the best with their Web 2.0 product range.</p> 

<p>So now I'd like to put a call out for a new sponsor. Please <a href="mailto:readwriteweb@gmail.com">contact me</a> to discuss.</p>

<p><b>This week:</b> Big events and news on the Web, automatic content for the people,
things you can do with RSS, API round-up, Techie Post of the Week: Social principles of Web 2.0.</p>

<h2>Big events and news on the Web</h2>

<p>It was a tough week for the Western world, when London was struck by a bombing attack.
I don't want to use this tragic event as a backdrop for tech talk, but I do think it's
noteworthy that the Web has become a crucial tool for news dissemination and
discussion nowadays. The <a
href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/7_July_2005_London_bombings">Wikipedia page on the
London bombings</a> was a comprehensive and thorough work-in-progress as the news
unfolded. As was <a
href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/in_depth/uk/2005/london_explosions/default.stm">the
BBC's Web coverage</a>, so it's not like mainstream media is being run out of business.
But it's clear that the Web is a key platform now when it comes to covering big news events - at least on a par with television and newspapers.</p>

<p>So-called social software websites played a big role too. <a href="http://flickr.com/groups/bomb/">Flickr was used extensively</a> by
people to post photos and for discussions. Personally I found myself visiting the
sites of bloggers I read who <a
href="http://www.plasticbag.org/archives/2005/07/explosions_rock_londons_infrastructure.shtml">
live in London</a>, are <a
href="http://209.34.241.67/alexbarn/archive/2005/07/07/436461.aspx">British expats</a> and even <a href="http://www.surfarama.com/index.php?p=193">kiwis who were in
London</a> at the time. And when you consider things like the <a
href="http://ilps.science.uva.nl/cgi-bin/livejournal/mood">LiveJournal Moodgrapher</a>,
which recorded a mood of "sadness and shock" amongst LiveJournalers following the attack,
well you realise how integral the Web has become when dealing with such events.</p>

<p>On a less serious note, the <a href="http://www.live8live.com">Live 8</a> event was
also covered very well on the Web. Indeed, apparently AOL's Web coverage was far superior
to MTV's on the television. <a
href="http://www.paidcontent.org/pc/arch/2005_07_03.shtml">PaidContent.org quoted
this</a> from an AP person: "AOL's coverage was so superior, it may one day be seen as a
historical marker in drawing people to computers instead of TV screens for big
events." The <a href="http://gillmorgang.podshow.com/?p=9">latest Gillmor Gang</a> has some interesting comments on this, particularly from guest <a href="http://susanmernit.blogspot.com/">Susan Mernit</a>.</p>

<h2>Automatic content for the people</h2>

<p>This week I wrote <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/002776.php">a musing
post about the new age of automated content</a> we're seeing on the Web. I looked at (what I deemed to be) both
good and bad examples of this phenomenon and concluded that my decisions about such
matters are more moral than legal. It turned into a very interesting discussion, which is
still open. As I noted in <a
href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/002776.php#001202">a comment I made</a> later
in the thread, my goals for this post were to come to an understanding of:</p>

<p>a) where my own content fits in with this new era of automated websites - I've established that I'm comfortable with sites like Planet Web 2.0 and Memeorandom, and even [Article Bot-generated] Stock Pick Report to a degree; and</p>

<p>b) what things should we, as users of the Web, be wary of in this new era of automation. And I think we should be wary of hundreds of thousands of robot-generated pages that have no redeeming social value for the Web and will clutter up search engine results.</p>

<p>It's a great discussion about Web 2.0 morals and ethics. Join in, the conversation's
still happening!</p>

<h2>Things you can do with RSS</h2>

<p><a href="http://timyang.com/">Tim Yang</a> continues his run of excellent tools and
resources - he was the bloke who created the <i>Google News To RSS Scraper</i> called <a
href="http://timyang.com/scrappygoo/">scrappygoo</a>. Now <a
href="http://www.timyang.com/wiki/doku.php?id=lists:thingsyoucandowithrss">he's come up
with a Wiki</a> featuring an extensive list of things you can do with RSS. Things
like:</p>

<p>- Track Fedex packages<br />
- Get bargains at Ebay<br />
- Get stock updates<br />
- Get the weather reports<br />
- Find out what people are saying about you, your company, your products<br />
- Track Music, radio shows, TV clips<br />
- Stay updated on someone's schedule<br />
- Get cinema schedule updates<br />
- Read your favourite comics</p>

<p>Check out <a
href="http://www.timyang.com/wiki/doku.php?id=lists:thingsyoucandowithrss">the wiki</a>
for the whole list.</p>

<h2>API round-up</h2>

<p>But wait, there's more! I also want to highlight <a href="http://particletree.com/notebook/api-roundup">Chris Campbell's round-up of APIs</a> (via <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/eric?m=265">Eric Lunt</a>). As Chris wrote, "if you're interested in adding to the Web 2.0 goodness, you've got to start understanding APIs." Too right - go check it out!</p>

<h2>Techie Post of the Week: Social principles of Web 2.0</h2>

<p>Ian Davis (of <a href="http://planetweb20.com/">Planet Web 2.0</a> fame) wrote a great
post about what he calls the Web 2.0 principles of "participation, openness and
communication." Here's how he defines this:</p>

<p><i>"Web 2.0 is an attitude not a technology. It's about enabling and encouraging
participation through open applications and services. By open I mean technically open
with appropriate APIs but also, more importantly, socially open, with rights granted to
use the content in new and exciting contexts."</i></p>

<p>Obviously this theory has a lot to do with the whole automated content issue <a
href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/002776.php">I raised</a> this
week. Often when we talk of Web 2.0, we mean APIs and RSS and XML and all those other
acronyms. But the whole idea of the 'read/write' Web is that everyone can and does contribute thoughts and ideas to the Web. So the social
aspects of Web 2.0 - participation, openness, two-way communication - are just as important as the platform and the acronyms. On this I heartily endorse Ian's position.</p>

<p>But we all have a lot of work to do yet, when it comes to defining what is socially
acceptable use of content and the Web - and what is not. I myself am still working it out and I'm only
just beginning to get comfortable with the idea of other sites re-publishing my writing.
The Remix Culture requires a big mindshift for everyone, so we're all figuring it out as
we go along.</p>

<p>That's a wrap for another week!</p>]]>
      
    </content>
  </entry>

</feed>