<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" 
      xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/big_blog_networ.php" />
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/atom.xml" />
  <id>tag:,2008:/1/tag:72.47.210.69,2005://1.4493-</id>
  <updated>2008-08-22T19:08:44Z</updated>
  <title>Comments for Big Blog Networks: my vision for Networks of Niches</title>
  
  <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 4.1</generator>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2005://1.4493</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/big_blog_networ.php" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=4493" title="Big Blog Networks: my vision for Networks of Niches" />
    <published>2005-08-09T16:51:21Z</published>
    <updated>2007-12-16T23:15:46Z</updated>
    <title>Big Blog Networks: my vision for Networks of Niches</title>
    <summary>A Network of Niches is a group of niche bloggers, each with their own unique look n&apos; feel but collectively part of a branded network of like minds. This could be the way forward for a big company like Yahoo or AOL to roll out their blog networks, at the same time giving hope to...</summary>
    <author>
      <name>Richard MacManus</name>
      <uri>http://www.readwriteweb.com</uri>
    </author>
    
    <category term="Writing" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.readwriteweb.com/">
      <![CDATA[<p><i>A <strong>Network of Niches</strong> is a group of niche bloggers, each with their own unique look n' feel but collectively part of a branded network of like minds. This could be the way forward for a big company like Yahoo or AOL to roll out their blog networks, at the same time giving hope to niche bloggers who write original and compelling content.</i></p>

<p>Following on from my post entitled <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/002792.php">Gettin' Paid: A Future for Content Creators? Redux</a>, I noticed (<a href="http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/07/17/yahoo-health-expert-blogs/">via Darren Rowse</a>) that Yahoo already has a beta blog service running. Yahoo's <a href="http://blogs.health.yahoo.com/experts/20050717">Health Expert Blogs</a> is not disimilar to what <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/">weblogsinc</a> and <a href="http://www.gawker.com">Gawker</a> do - blog about a certain topic under a business brand. Indeed there are signs that Yahoo is about to launch a <a href="http://boulter.com/blog/2005/06/03/im-hiring-again/">Technology</a> blog network.</p>

<p>However it's not at the level of what I had in mind in my <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/002792.php">Gettin' Paid</a> post. I am envisaging a network of independent experts, each with their own unique brand. This may be a pipe dream of mine, but I still hold out hope that Yahoo or perhaps AOL (with <a href="http://www.feedster.com/">Feedster</a>'s help) will implement what I dream of. btw Yahoo and AOL, I'm available for consulting work to help you do that! ;-)</p>

<p>Yahoo's Health Expert Blogs are certainly one step ahead of Microsoft's <a href="http://filter.msn.com/">Filter network</a>. The fact that Yahoo names its bloggers, and indeed centers each blog around the expert that writes it, is fantastic. e.g. <a href="http://blogs.health.yahoo.com/experts/yogayee">Rodney Yee's Yoga blog</a> has some great writing in it. All it needs though is some unique branding and design to bring out Rodney's personality even more. The design of the Yahoo Health blogs is bland and doesn't do justice to the 'voice' of the blogger. That's why I'm pushing a vision of independently branded bloggers, yet still identifiable as part of a network of bloggers who write about a defined topic. </p>

<p>A note about the terms I'm using: each topic has a number of niches. There is 1 blogger per niche but, for example, 10 bloggers per topic. So there is real potential for a Yahoo or an AOL to collect together groups of like minds ("experts") and get the best of both worlds - independence and network effects. </p>

<p>Yahoo or AOL (or another bigco) should let the bloggers keep the unique brands they've built up, but fold groups of them under their wing as blog networks - and pay them! The bigco's benefit by gathering experts into networks and promoting them on their homepages. And they get great content :-)</p>

<p>If I had to come up with a term for this - it'd be a <strong>Network of Niches</strong>. Which I define as: a group of niche bloggers, each with their own unique look n' feel but collectively part of a branded network of like minds.</p>]]>
      
    </content>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2005://1.4493-comment:36144</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2005://1.4493" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/big_blog_networ.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/big_blog_networ.php#c36144" />
    <title>Comment from Mike Torres on 2005-08-09</title>
    <author>
        <name>Mike Torres</name>
        <uri>http://spaces.msn.com/members/mike</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://spaces.msn.com/members/mike">
        <![CDATA[<p>This is an interesting post.  Two things:</p>

<p>1. MSN Filter blogs identify the author.  It was a choice not to at first, but they now do.  Example:</p>

<p><a href="http://spaces.msn.com/members/technologyfilter/Blog/" rel="nofollow"><a href="http://spaces.msn.com/members/technologyfilter/Blog/" rel="nofollow">http://spaces.msn.com/members/technologyfilter/Blog/</a></a><br />
cns!1pClK6dT9GE9XXDwAqQxHgyQ!301.entry</p>

<p>2. I get Yahoo - but I find it odd that you think AOL will nail this before MSN.  What's up with that?</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2005-08-09T20:27:47Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2005://1.4493-comment:36145</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2005://1.4493" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/big_blog_networ.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/big_blog_networ.php#c36145" />
    <title>Comment from Richard MacManus on 2005-08-09</title>
    <author>
        <name>Richard MacManus</name>
        <uri>http://www.readwriteweb.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.readwriteweb.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>Hi Mike,</p>

<p>Good to hear MSN Filter now identifies its bloggers. That's a start :-)</p>

<p>The AOL reference comes from recent talk of them rolling out a Yahoo-like portal. See:</p>

<p><a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/002757.php" rel="nofollow"><a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/002757.php" rel="nofollow">http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/002757.php</a></a></p>

<p>and more specifically: <br />
<a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/002761.php" rel="nofollow"><a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/002761.php" rel="nofollow">http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/002761.php</a></a></p>

<p>Granted, it may be more optimisim on my part than logic - I come from New Zealand, so I don't have the baggage of knowing what AOL 1.0 was like in the 90's ;-)</p>

<p>As for MSN, the Filter Network is OK - but I'd really like you guys to open up to niche bloggers. I nearly applied for a Filter job, but decided that I wasn't 'mainstream' enough to do it. I like my own niche and I think most of the innovative content in the blogosphere comes from the little people - one man/woman bands running their own topic-focused blogs.</p>

<p>In this post, I was specifically wanting to get the attention of Yahoo and AOL. But the fact that an MSN employee is the first to pick up on it and comment - goes to show that maybe MSN *will* be the first to do it. :-)</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2005-08-09T21:15:29Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2005://1.4493-comment:36146</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2005://1.4493" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/big_blog_networ.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/big_blog_networ.php#c36146" />
    <title>Comment from Mike Torres on 2005-08-10</title>
    <author>
        <name>Mike Torres</name>
        <uri>http://spaces.msn.com/members/mike</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://spaces.msn.com/members/mike">
        <![CDATA[<p>That's cool.  I guess I *do* have that baggage ;)</p>

<p>I just tend to think MSN and Yahoo are far better positioned in every way than AOL...  we already have MyMSN/Start.com and the starts of a pretty cool Filter network.  Not to mention over 19 million MSN Spaces which AOL Journals can't touch.</p>

<p>But I am biased ;)</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2005-08-10T12:34:24Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2005://1.4493-comment:36147</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2005://1.4493" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/big_blog_networ.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/big_blog_networ.php#c36147" />
    <title>Comment from Peter Cooper on 2005-08-12</title>
    <author>
        <name>Peter Cooper</name>
        <uri>http://www.petercooper.co.uk/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.petercooper.co.uk/">
        <![CDATA[<p>The 9rules network matches, as far as I can tell, exactly what you're suggesting - <a href="http://9rules.com/" rel="nofollow"><a href="http://9rules.com/" rel="nofollow">http://9rules.com/</a></a></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2005-08-12T19:50:30Z</published>
  </entry>

</feed>