<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" 
      xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/feeds_is_the_ne.php" />
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/atom.xml" />
  <id>tag:,2009:/1/tag:72.47.210.69,2005://1.4498-</id>
  <updated>2009-11-23T20:01:11Z</updated>
  <title>Comments for Feeds is the new RSS</title>
  
  <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 4.23-en</generator>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2005://1.4498</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/feeds_is_the_ne.php" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=4498" title="Feeds is the new RSS" />
    <published>2005-08-14T19:23:19Z</published>
    <updated>2007-12-16T23:15:47Z</updated>
    <title>Feeds is the new RSS</title>
    <summary>This week I kicked off a discussion about what the brand name of RSS should be, going forward. It&apos;s generated a lot of great discussion, including some excellent comments on my blog. And funnily enough, I&apos;m now convinced that in fact RSS is not the right term to market to the masses. &apos;Web feeds&apos; is...</summary>
    <author>
      <name>Richard MacManus</name>
      <uri>http://www.readwriteweb.com</uri>
    </author>
    
    <category term="RSS &amp; Feed Management" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.readwriteweb.com/">
      <![CDATA[<p>This week <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/002796.php">I kicked off a discussion</a> about what the
brand name of RSS should be, going forward. It's
generated a lot of great discussion, including some excellent comments
<a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/002796.php">on my blog</a>. And
funnily enough, I'm now convinced that in fact RSS is not the right term to
market to the masses. 'Web feeds' is the term I like the most, although the
abbreviated 'feeds' is also fine. <a href="http://spaces.msn.com/members/mike"> Mike
Torres</a>, Program Manager on MSN Spaces,
made a very good point when he said that using the term 'web feeds' for RSS is akin to using 'web pages' to refer to HTML files.</p>

<p>Ed Bott also made an excellent point <a href="http://www.edbott.com/weblog/archives/000930.html"> when he
said</a>: &quot;The reason some people at Microsoft are exploring alternatives to RSS is because
<i> people don't understand the term</i>.&quot;</p>

<p>But most interesting to note is the turnaround in the IE7 Team at Microsoft.
They originally had an orange RSS feed button in the demo that <a href="http://channel9.msdn.com/ShowPost.aspx?PostID=80533">Robert Scoble
filmed</a> just before Gnomedex in June (I specifically mentioned that <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/002766.php"> in my post at the
time</a>). But now it seems Microsoft has abandoned the orange RSS button and <a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/rssteam/archive/2005/08/03/446904.aspx">gone
with a stylized orange logo</a>:</p>

<p><img src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/ie7_feeds_button.jpg" border="0" alt="Microsoft IE7 Feeds Button" /></p>

<p>And to prove I'm not just drinking the Microsoft kool-aid, Yahoo is also
using the term 'feeds' more to describe RSS. See <a href="http://blog.360.yahoo.com/product_360?p=570">this
post</a> referencing the &quot;feeds module&quot; of <a href="http://360.yahoo.com">Yahoo
360</a> (hat-tip <a href="http://blog.360.yahoo.com/blog-Koiy.8g5erBQbNe3hOk-">Havi</a>).
Needless to say, <a href="http://news.google.com/intl/en_us/news_feed_terms.html">Google
is using 'feeds'</a> as their main term - and ignores the orange buttons
altogether.</p>

<p>So <a href="http://archive.scripting.com/2005/08/13#meanInternationalSoftwareMonopoly">sorry
Dave</a> and <a href="http://radio.weblogs.com/0001011/2005/08/12.html#a10833">Robert</a>,
but it looks like the tide has turned. All 3 bigco's are using 'feeds' and the majority of people that commented on <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/002796.php">my post</a> are too. The people have spoken - feeds is it.</p>]]>
      
    </content>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2005://1.4498-comment:36186</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2005://1.4498" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/feeds_is_the_ne.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/feeds_is_the_ne.php#c36186" />
    <title>Comment from Randy Charles Morin on 2005-08-16</title>
    <author>
        <name>Randy Charles Morin</name>
        <uri>http://www.kbcafe.com/rss</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.kbcafe.com/rss">
        <![CDATA[<p>I like RSS. MHO.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2005-08-16T19:37:22Z</published>
  </entry>

</feed>