<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" 
      xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/gettin_paid_a_f_1.php" />
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/atom.xml" />
  <id>tag:,2009:/1/tag:72.47.210.69,2005://1.4491-</id>
  <updated></updated>
  <title>Comments for Gettin&apos; Paid: A Future for Content Creators? Redux</title>
  
  <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 4.23-en</generator>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2005://1.4491</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/gettin_paid_a_f_1.php" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=4491" title="Gettin' Paid: A Future for Content Creators? Redux" />
    <published>2005-08-08T17:54:02Z</published>
    <updated>2007-12-16T23:15:46Z</updated>
    <title>Gettin&apos; Paid: A Future for Content Creators? Redux</title>
    <summary>Remember my post last year entitled Gettin&apos; Paid: A Future for Content Creators?. In it I passionately made the case that there is a future for niche writers to make a living on the Web. Well there are signs that it may yet happen... Microsoft has just started a network of blogs called Filter. The...</summary>
    <author>
      <name>Richard MacManus</name>
      <uri>http://www.readwriteweb.com</uri>
    </author>
    
    <category term="Writing" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.readwriteweb.com/">
      <![CDATA[<p>Remember my post last year entitled <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/002427.php">Gettin' Paid: A Future for Content Creators?</a>. In it I passionately made the case that there is a future for niche writers to make a living on the Web. Well there are signs that it may yet happen...</p>

<p>Microsoft has just started a network of blogs called <a href="http://filter.msn.com/">Filter</a>. The blogs in Filter are fairly bland and the writers are not revealed. Indeed it makes a big noise about the content being largely generated by the readers and the "bloggers" job is to filter it: "...our team of bloggers will filter the best stories, photographs, links and other interesting tidbits that you've sent in, as well as items that they've dug up."</p>

<p>Before you ask, NO the Microsoft Filter network is not my idea of content creators gettin' paid for their writing. Read on...</p>

<p>Interestingly, Jason Calacanis has put a positive spin on this 'blog network' competition from Microsoft. <a href="http://calacanis.weblogsinc.com/entry/1234000277053483/">Jason wrote:</a></p>

<p><em>"Now, Iím thrilled MSN is in the game because at some point soon Iím sure they will make these Filter sites and/or Start.com the default homepage for tens of millions of MSN/IE users. [...] Having these big players move blogs to the top level will be huge for blogging."</em></p>

<p>I'm pleased Jason is being optimistic about it. I am too. Jason asked his readers for their opinions on which one of the big four will put blogs on the front page first: Google, Yahoo, MSN/Microsoft, or AOL?</p>

<p>I can tell you who it definitely *won't* be - Google.</p>

<p>My money's on Yahoo and AOL. Indeed I have hopes that both of them will fulfil my dreams of getting paid for my writing, by opening up and inviting truly independent content creators into their fold.</p>

<p>Microsoft's Filter network is a pretty bland, nameless lot of bloggers. Weblogs inc and Gawker are kind of inbetween Microsoft and where I want Yahoo and AOL to be. The personality of Jason's and Nick's bloggers shine through, but they do their thing under the weblogs inc and gawker umbrellas - instead of being their own unique Brands. Which is what I'm trying to be here at Read/Write Web ;-)</p>

<p>Not that I'm saying there's anything wrong with Jason's or any of these approaches - just that I'm hoping one of the big players decides to truly open up their network to small unique brands.</p>

<p>Interestingly, new Yahoo hire Matt McAlister (ex-IDG) has been writing some thought-provoking posts along these lines. <a href="http://mattmcalister.blogharbor.com/blog/_archives/2005/8/1/1095986.html">He wrote recently</a>:</p>

<p><em>"I wish somebody would launch a media brand that covered the Internet business for people in the Internet business.  I've bet my career on this industry, and it would be really nice if there was a brand that stood independently in the middle of it, reported on it with intelligence and depth and integrity, and helped facilitate dialog amongst us all."<br />
</em></p>

<p>I'm still trying to grok where Matt is coming from - but I bet you it has something to do with this current discussion of network blogs and what Yahoo has planned in that regard. <a href="http://mattmcalister.blogharbor.com/blog/_archives/2005/8/5/1111712.html">In a follow-up post</a> Matt wrote:</p>

<p><em>"What's missing is that independent voice, the insightful mind with a view from outside who can identify the right people to listen to and the right trends to pay attention to and the right companies to learn from."</em></p>

<p>Well, there's no shortage of independent and insightful voices out in the blogosphere! Whether Yahoo hires them, or brings them under their wing in a 'blog network', or some other approach - remains to be seen.</p>

<p>Could this be the rise of small, niche content creators gettin' paid for what we love doing? I sure hope so!</p>]]>
      
    </content>
  </entry>

</feed>