<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" 
      xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/google_blog_sea.php" />
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/atom.xml" />
  <id>tag:,2009:/1/tag:72.47.210.69,2005://1.4525-</id>
  <updated>2009-10-30T14:53:04Z</updated>
  <title>Comments for Google Blog Search Sucks</title>
  
  <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 4.23-en</generator>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2005://1.4525</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/google_blog_sea.php" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=4525" title="Google Blog Search Sucks" />
    <published>2005-09-14T19:48:56Z</published>
    <updated>2007-12-16T23:15:48Z</updated>
    <title>Google Blog Search Sucks</title>
    <summary>Why? Because they&apos;ve only indexed my blog up till 26 May 2005! What&apos;s up with that?! SearchEngineWatch has a good summary of opinions in the blogosphere. Put me down as &apos;Underwhelmed&apos; please Danny (sub-category &apos;Peeved&apos;). UPDATE: I&apos;ve discovered the issue is that Google Blog Search indexes the RSS domain name, not the blog one. Because...</summary>
    <author>
      <name>Richard MacManus</name>
      <uri>http://www.readwriteweb.com</uri>
    </author>
    
    <category term="Blogging" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.readwriteweb.com/">
      <![CDATA[<p>Why? Because they've only <a href="http://blogsearch.google.com/blogsearch?as_q=&num=10&hl=en&c2coff=1&btnG=Search+Blogs&as_epq=&as_oq=&as_eq=&bl_pt=&bl_bt=&bl_url=readwriteweb.com&bl_auth=&as_drrb=q&as_qdr=&as_mind=1&as_minm=3&as_miny=2005&as_maxd=14&as_maxm=9&as_maxy=2005&lr=&safe=off&scoring=d&filter=0&sa=N&start=0">indexed my blog</a> up till 26 May 2005! What's up with that?!</p>

<p><a href="http://blog.searchenginewatch.com/blog/050914-092757">SearchEngineWatch</a> has a good summary of opinions in the blogosphere. Put me down as 'Underwhelmed' please Danny (sub-category 'Peeved').</p>

<p><b>UPDATE:</b> I've discovered the issue is that Google Blog Search indexes the RSS domain name, not the blog one. Because I have a Feedburner RSS feed, it's indexing feeds.feedburner.com/readwriteweb as the domain name for my blog. This is true of other Feedburner customers too - e.g. John Battelle's blog has the same issue. So I've contacted Google Blog Search about this.</p>]]>
      
    </content>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2005://1.4525-comment:36306</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2005://1.4525" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/google_blog_sea.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/google_blog_sea.php#c36306" />
    <title>Comment from J on 2005-09-14</title>
    <author>
        <name>J</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Weird that, this blog entry though, is the second hit on <a href="http://google.com/blogsearch?scoring=d&q=%22blog+search%22" rel="nofollow"><a href="http://google.com/blogsearch?scoring=d&q=%22blog+search%22" rel="nofollow">http://google.com/blogsearch?scoring=d&q=%22blog+search%22</a></a><br />
Wich is linked from the Google Blog<br />
<a href="http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2005/09/" rel="nofollow"><a href="http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2005/09/" rel="nofollow">http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2005/09/</a></a><br />
find-out-whats-happening-with-blog.html<br />
That probably explains why you get more traffic and proves that their index is up to date. :)</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2005-09-14T20:27:53Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2005://1.4525-comment:36307</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2005://1.4525" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/google_blog_sea.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/google_blog_sea.php#c36307" />
    <title>Comment from Richard MacManus on 2005-09-14</title>
    <author>
        <name>Richard MacManus</name>
        <uri>http://www.readwriteweb.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.readwriteweb.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>Ah, I see what's happening now - it's indexing this URL:</p>

<p>feeds.feedburner.com/readwriteweb</p>

<p>Because they index the RSS feed, it thinks Feedburner is my URL. Hmmmmm, I wonder if this affects other Feedburner customers?</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2005-09-14T20:35:05Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2005://1.4525-comment:36308</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2005://1.4525" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/google_blog_sea.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/google_blog_sea.php#c36308" />
    <title>Comment from Richard MacManus on 2005-09-14</title>
    <author>
        <name>Richard MacManus</name>
        <uri>http://www.readwriteweb.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.readwriteweb.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>Yes it's doing the same with John Battelle's blog: <a href="http://battellemedia.com/" rel="nofollow"><a href="http://battellemedia.com/" rel="nofollow">http://battellemedia.com/</a></a></p>

<p>I'll contact Google and Feedburner about it.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2005-09-14T20:39:14Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2005://1.4525-comment:36309</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2005://1.4525" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/google_blog_sea.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/google_blog_sea.php#c36309" />
    <title>Comment from Kingsley Idehen on 2005-09-14</title>
    <author>
        <name>Kingsley Idehen</name>
        <uri>http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen">
        <![CDATA[<p>I have been waiting for the trigger event that brings light to an issue that has bugged me since 2003 re. most blogs. Why would you host your blog system using a service (or self managed installation) that doesn't have the ability to syndicate your posts using Atom or RSS at the very least? This is why I opted for a home grown Blog system that leverages our Virtuoso product. If you look at my blog you will notice that I can syndicate post and search results in all the major syndication formats. I can aggregate my syndications via OPML and OCS. I can even do the same thing with search results (and integrate transparently with Open Search).  I wonder if you see the Web 2.0 angle in all of this? Its back to that "Point of Presence" thing again :-)  Web 2.0 is about "Points of Presence" for syndicating content (using standard syndication formats), publishing executable endpoints (SOAP or RESTful style Web Services), and many other things to come (back to the future style!). Virtuoso (by design) is able to provide the kind of presence that I describe within domains of my choosing (something I believe everyone will need to do in the not too distant future). Google will need to get a little semantic in order for it to effectively connect feedburner to those blogs that depend on it for content syndication services.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2005-09-15T00:29:39Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2005://1.4525-comment:36310</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2005://1.4525" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/google_blog_sea.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/google_blog_sea.php#c36310" />
    <title>Comment from Manuel Viloria on 2005-09-16</title>
    <author>
        <name>Manuel Viloria</name>
        <uri>http://www.viloria.com/secondthoughts/archives/00000780.html</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.viloria.com/secondthoughts/archives/00000780.html">
        <![CDATA[<p>That's also happening with me, so I've changed the Feedburner links on my site. I wonder how long it will take Google to update its Blog Search results page.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2005-09-16T09:32:38Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2005://1.4525-comment:36311</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2005://1.4525" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/google_blog_sea.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/google_blog_sea.php#c36311" />
    <title>Comment from Richard MacManus on 2005-09-16</title>
    <author>
        <name>Richard MacManus</name>
        <uri>http://www.readwriteweb.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.readwriteweb.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>Hi Manuel, Feedburner told me they've also contacted Google about the issue. I expect it will be fixed up pretty soon.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2005-09-16T10:36:58Z</published>
  </entry>

</feed>