<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" 
      xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/web_20_weekly_w_32.php" />
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/atom.xml" />
  <id>tag:,2009:/1/tag:72.47.210.69,2005://1.4515-</id>
  <updated>2009-10-30T14:53:09Z</updated>
  <title>Comments for Web 2.0 Weekly Wrap-up, 29 Aug - 4 Sep 2005</title>
  
  <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 4.23-en</generator>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2005://1.4515</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/web_20_weekly_w_32.php" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=4515" title="Web 2.0 Weekly Wrap-up, 29 Aug - 4 Sep 2005" />
    <published>2005-09-05T08:52:59Z</published>
    <updated>2007-12-16T23:15:48Z</updated>
    <title>Web 2.0 Weekly Wrap-up, 29 Aug - 4 Sep 2005</title>
    <summary>This week: Social tools in disasters, VC trends, Custom Web 2.0 Business Plans, Web-based Office, Techie post of the week - APIs and control.</summary>
    <author>
      <name>Richard MacManus</name>
      <uri>http://www.readwriteweb.com</uri>
    </author>
    
    <category term="Web 2.0 Weekly Wrap-Ups" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.readwriteweb.com/">
      <![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.onfolio.com/index.cfm?src=170">sponsored by:</a><br />
 <a href="http://www.onfolio.com/index.cfm?src=170" border="0"><img
src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/onfolio_banner.gif" border="0" alt="Onfolio"
width="400" height="60" /></a></p>

<p><b>This week:</b> Social tools in disasters, VC trends, Custom Web 2.0 Business Plans, Web-based Office, Techie post of the week - APIs and control.</p>

<h2>Social tools help in Katrina Hurricane</h2>

<p>First things first. We've all been shocked by the Hurricane Katrina devastation. Dina Mehta has a couple of great posts that show the way for people to help, using blogs and social software (we all do what we can with the tools we know). <a href="http://radio.weblogs.com/0121664/2005/09/04.html#a688">Dina
wrote</a>:</p>

<blockquote>
<p>"The <a href="http://katrinahelp.info/">KatrinaHelp wiki</a> and <a
href="http://katrinahelp.blogspot.com/">blog</a> teams, made up of people across USA,
Europe, Bahrain, India and many more places, are&nbsp;currently also working with some of
the&nbsp;developers around the Skype API and the <a
href="http://www.skypejournal.com/">SkypeJournal</a> team (all independents, and <a
href="http://www.skype.com/">Skype</a> too has been supportive by offering up free
SkypeOut minutes) and have managed to set up a kind of messaging centre between
volunteers on the ground to connect those needing help with those that have it to offer.
[...] Lets see how it emerges. What we could build around blogs and wikis and RSS and
tagging and VOIP There are so <a
href="http://www.skypejournal.com/blog/archives/2005/09/can_communities.php">many</a> <a
href="http://www.skypejournal.com/blog/archives/2005/09/has_the_fcc_don.php">possibilities</a>."</p>
</blockquote>

<p>In a not unrelated <a href="http://radio.weblogs.com/0121664/2005/09/04.html#a687">follow-up
post</a>, Dina tells us what it's like to be poor in her home country of
India. Also check out Nancy White's <a
href="http://www.fullcirc.com/weblog/onfacblog.htm">Full Circle blog</a>, which is
covering the Katrina crisis and pointing to resources.</p>

<h2>VC Trends</h2>

<p>If you've been following the Web 2.0 space (there's a good lingo word to use), you'll
have noticed that Venture Capitalists have taken up blogging in a big way. I take this as
an encouraging sign for both the market and the blogosphere - the latter because most VCs
have an excellent strategic sense and are not shy about blogging their insights. I won't
try and name every VC blogger, but a good RSS feed to subscribe to is <a
href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/thevcchannel">The VC Channel</a> - it aggregates a lot
of the top VC bloggers. There's also a <a
href="http://www.superblog.org/planet/thevcchannel/">VC Channel website</a>.</p>

<p>Some of the hot trends that VCs are looking at are: China (particularly Bokee, China's
biggest blog network), mobile, consumer software aimed at The Long Tail, social media,
Web 2.0. As Venture Capitalist David Cowan commented <a
href="http://www.redherring.com/Article.aspx?a=13430&amp;hed=VCs%20Back%20China%20Blog%20Site:%20$10M">
in RedHerring</a>:</p>

<blockquote>
<p>"Investments such as Bokee extend our consumer portfolio into the realm of
applications widely known as web2.0, which to us means applications that are viral in
nature and leverage consumer-generated content&mdash;two elements of a business that lead
to rapid growth and high margins."&nbsp;</p>
</blockquote>

<p>Cowan expanded on this comment <a
href="http://whohastimeforthis.blogspot.com/2005/08/consumer-investing-1.html">in his
blog</a>, noting that he is targeting the mobile and Asian consumer markets right now. He
wrote more about his Consumer Investing theory in <a
href="http://whohastimeforthis.blogspot.com/2005/08/consumer-investing-2.html">a
follow-up post</a>.</p>

<p>In another VC post this week, Jeremy Levine wrote about <a
href="http://nothingventurednothinggained.blogspot.com/2005/08/shorts-and-longs.html">shorts
and longs</a> - meaning short-term and long-term investment opportunities. An example of
a 'long' is what Levine terms "eBay for" businesses, which he defined as marketplaces
that "make money by providing a forum for buyers and sellers to come together."</p>

<h2>Custom Web 2.0 Business Plan</h2>

<p>So if you're a humble developer or wanna-be entrepreneur, how does one attract the
attention of a VC? Well you could try the <a href="http://odio.us/plan/">odio.us Gateway
to Web 2.0 Riches</a>, developed by <a href="http://nathan.torkington.com/">Nathan
Torkington</a>. It automatically generates a Web 2.0 business plan elevator pitch for
you. Examples are:</p>

<p>- Decentralized Web 2.0 Ruby on Rails IM infrastructure that leverages the basic human
need to connect.</p>

<p>- Mobile hybridized AJAX photo Firefox extension that leverages grassroots talent.</p>

<p>- Multi-device open source tagging-enabled voice web-app that leverages ubiquitous
broadband.</p>

<p>- Long invite-only beta disruptive emergent calendaring Firefox extension that
leverages network effects.</p>

<p>This reminds me - I wonder when the first Web 2.0 Reality TV show will be made? How
about Tim O'Reilly as the Donald Trump character in 'The Apprentice 2.0'? ("MacManus, you
failed to leverage the Long Tail and I didn't see any evidence of Network Effects. You're
fired!") ;-)</p>

<h2>Web 2.0 Office</h2>

<p>I wrote a post this week summarizing some <a
href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/002814.php">recent trends in Web-based Office
software</a>. I mentioned new and trendy products like <a
href="http://www.writely.com/">Writely</a> (Web-based word processing) and <a
href="http://www.kiko.com/">Kiko</a> (online calendar). My post got some great comments.
<a href="http://www.iseff.com">Ian</a> mentioned his new product called <a
href="http://www.openomy.com">Openomy</a>, which he describes as an "online file-system".
<a href="http://icite.net/blog/">Jay</a> pointed out that "the first Ajax app was
Microsoft's web version of Outlook". <a href="http://www.myelin.co.nz/post/">Phil
Pearson</a> (who I met for the first time this week, in Wellington) mentioned
that a company called HalfBrain developed an AJAX office suite back in the late 90's.
Phil said it was made available to the public, "but then it got bought by IBM and
disappeared".</p>

<p>I just updated that post tonight, with some more Web 2.0 Office products, so <a
href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/002814.php">check it out</a>.</p>

<h2>Techie Post of the Week: APIs and control</h2>

<p>Thought-provoking <a
href="http://www.abstractdynamics.org/archives/2005/08/27/web_20.html">essay by William
Blaze</a>, who asks: who really has control in an API-powered Web 2.0 world. William
says that the API is actually "a system of control", in which "the API creator has a
nearly limitless ability to regulate what can go in and out of their system." He goes on
to write:</p>

<blockquote>
<p>"Privilege is what the Web 2.0 is really about. What separates the Web 2.0 from that
plain old "web" is the establishment and entrenchment of a hierarchy of power and
control. This is not the same control that Microsoft, AOL and other closed system /
walled garden companies tried unsuccessfully to push upon internet users. Power in the
Web 2.0 comes not from controlling the whole system, but in controlling the connections
in a larger network of systems. It is the power of those who create not open systems, but
semi-open systems, the power of API writers, network builders and standards
definers."</p>
</blockquote>

<p><a href="http://mike.teczno.com/notes/freedom_discipline.html">Michal Migurski</a>
also posted some thoughts on this.&nbsp;</p>

<p>While I don't agree entirely with William's thesis - it's too cynical to say that privilege is what Web
2.0 is about - he does make you think about the implications of APIs.
William's right, APIs from the likes of Google, Amazon and Flickr always come with
restrictions and strings attached. While we use the platforms of those companies, via
their APIs, we're never in complete control.&nbsp;</p>

<h2>That's a Wrap!</h2>

<p>OK, that's just about it for the week. Before I go, I want to give a shout-out to fellow Web 2.0 chroniclers <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com">TechCrunch</a>. I'll be rooming with the TechCrunch crew in October, when I'm over in Silicon Valley. I can't wait to visit the home of the Web and shmooze with all the <a href="http://susanmernit.blogspot.com/2005/09/drinks-with-techcrunch.html">great</a> <a href="http://codinginparadise.org/weblog/2005/09/coworking-is-coming-together.html">people</a> I've gotten to know virtually via my blog.</p>

<p>That's a wrap for another week!</p>]]>
      
    </content>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2005://1.4515-comment:36256</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2005://1.4515" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/web_20_weekly_w_32.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/web_20_weekly_w_32.php#c36256" />
    <title>Comment from Phillip Pearson on 2005-09-05</title>
    <author>
        <name>Phillip Pearson</name>
        <uri>http://www.myelin.co.nz/post/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.myelin.co.nz/post/">
        <![CDATA[<p>More on HalfBrain and IBM: it turns out that a company called Alphablox bought HalfBrain, and then Alphablox was bought by IBM.  There was a public spreadsheet site called blox.com; maybe this was run during the Alphablox period?  Anyway, IBM has integrated the code into its WebSphere Portal product, and ported it so it'll work with Mozilla as well as IE.</p>

<p>"Now IBM buys Alphablox": <a href="http://www.looselycoupled.com/blog/lc00aa00045.html" rel="nofollow"><a href="http://www.looselycoupled.com/blog/lc00aa00045.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.looselycoupled.com/blog/lc00aa00045.html</a></a></p>

<p>More on what IBM is doing with the tech: <a href="http://www.looselycoupled.com/blog/lc00aa00046.html" rel="nofollow"><a href="http://www.looselycoupled.com/blog/lc00aa00046.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.looselycoupled.com/blog/lc00aa00046.html</a></a></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2005-09-06T01:21:16Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2005://1.4515-comment:36257</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2005://1.4515" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/web_20_weekly_w_32.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/web_20_weekly_w_32.php#c36257" />
    <title>Comment from Nancy White on 2005-09-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>Nancy White</name>
        <uri>http://www.fullcirc.com/weblog/onfacblog.htm</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.fullcirc.com/weblog/onfacblog.htm">
        <![CDATA[<p>Richard, thanks for covering the Katrina work and how the online technologists and communities are trying to respond. </p>

<p>I'm not "web 2.0" literate, but this meme keeps showing up on my screen today (see Jeff Jarvis' post) and I'm seriously interested in how we can think about future responses based on where the web is heading. So I strongly encourage you to keep this thread going as you add your knowledge to the pool. </p>

<p>Thanks</p>

<p>Nancy</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2005-09-06T15:55:20Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2005://1.4515-comment:36258</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2005://1.4515" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/web_20_weekly_w_32.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/web_20_weekly_w_32.php#c36258" />
    <title>Comment from ted on 2005-09-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>ted</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>The web 2.0 B-plan generator brings back memories of the bull sh*t generator I first saw  back in 2000 or 2001. Amazing how the core meaning of buzz words really don't change that much.</p>

<p><a href="http://www.dack.com/web/bullshit.html" rel="nofollow"><a href="http://www.dack.com/web/bullshit.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.dack.com/web/bullshit.html</a></a></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2005-09-07T05:56:36Z</published>
  </entry>

</feed>