<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" 
      xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/barry_diller_co.php" />
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/atom.xml" />
  <id>tag:,2009:/1/tag:72.47.210.69,2005://1.4557-</id>
  <updated></updated>
  <title>Comments for Barry Diller conversation</title>
  
  <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 4.23-en</generator>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2005://1.4557</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/barry_diller_co.php" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=4557" title="Barry Diller conversation" />
    <published>2005-10-05T23:48:37Z</published>
    <updated>2007-12-16T23:15:50Z</updated>
    <title>Barry Diller conversation</title>
    <summary><![CDATA[John Battelle is speaking to Barry Diller of IAC. John asked straight off: why did you buy Ask? Barry: search box would keep evolving and more convergence through it. They &quot;plunged&quot; into an arrangement with Ask. If they failed and didn't gain share, that's OK - because it (Ask) has &quot;enormous promise&quot;. Barry says a...]]></summary>
    <author>
      <name>Richard MacManus</name>
      <uri>http://www.readwriteweb.com</uri>
    </author>
    
    <category term="Web 2.0 Conference 2005" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.readwriteweb.com/">
      <![CDATA[<p>John Battelle is speaking to Barry Diller of IAC. John asked straight off:
why did you buy Ask? Barry: search box would keep evolving and more convergence
through it. They &quot;plunged&quot; into an arrangement with Ask. If they
failed and didn't gain share, that's OK - because it (Ask) has &quot;enormous
promise&quot;. Barry says a lot of things to do: gather a lot of services
together that is differentiated as possible. Features are appealing - if they
can market them &quot;noisely enough&quot; then that's a way to gain market
share. They have a lot of verticals, services, which they can link up to Ask.</p>
<p>John: Google is leader in the space and isn't losing share. What comes to
mind when you think of Google?</p>
<p>Barry: they were first ones to clean the page up - it was a kind of genius.
[this is not verbatim btw]. Basically says they're a great product.</p>
<p>John asks a question about being an &quot;Internet Mogal&quot;. Barry talks
about being &quot;distribution agnostic&quot;. Things will come through the
search box / convergence will create a potential total change-up of the players.
</p>
<p>John asks about user-generated content and Barry's position on that. Barry
says &quot;there's not that much talent in the world&quot;. Talks about
&quot;editorship&quot;, people who have talent and expertise in entertainment
space not going to be displaced by 18 million people making home videos (!!).
John segues to Rupert Murdoch - &quot;he's bought these things very cheap or
they're worthless&quot;. Says Murdoch takes risk and is a risk-taker.</p>
<p>John asks his reaction on eBay buying Skype. Not the kind of deal he would
make for his company. He says eBay's buy is speculative, but won't elaborate.</p>
<p>John asks about &quot;net neutrality&quot;. Barry says it's about doing
anything you want (re services), but can't get in the way of anyone else doing
services.</p>
<p>qst: is future of IAC increasing distribution or increasing breadth?</p>
<p>Barry: we have lots of brands, could screw it up. Innovate. Only constrained
by their own ideas.</p>
<p>qst: re dismissing microcontent, user-generated content. Speaking as a Media
Mogal, not Internet Mogal?</p>
<p>Barry: we're talking about mass audiences, a system of entertainment.
Entertainment, making tv or movie or game - going to be relatively few people
doing that, due to not enough talent.</p>
<p>qst: how can minor internet players transform in new media world?</p>
<p>Barry: if you have a good idea on the internet, you have &quot;so much more
runway&quot;, more opportunities. Good ideas resonate. Nothing really stands in
the way - unlike other forms of media, which have gatekeepers etc.</p>]]>
      
    </content>
  </entry>

</feed>