<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" 
      xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/mashups_best_pr.php" />
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/atom.xml" />
  <id>tag:,2009:/1/tag:72.47.210.69,2005://1.4579-</id>
  <updated></updated>
  <title>Comments for Mash-ups Best Practice and Business Models</title>
  
  <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 4.23-en</generator>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2005://1.4579</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/mashups_best_pr.php" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=4579" title="Mash-ups Best Practice and Business Models" />
    <published>2005-10-12T03:30:57Z</published>
    <updated>2007-12-16T23:15:51Z</updated>
    <title>Mash-ups Best Practice and Business Models</title>
    <summary>The necessary components of a mash-up according to the panelists are AJAX or a similar client-side technology, APIs in the backend (or RSS and/or scraping if need be - although some people argue scraping isn&apos;t truly Web 2.0), and a lot of work on the UI and data sets by the developer(s). Paul Rademacher mentioned...</summary>
    <author>
      <name>Richard MacManus</name>
      <uri>http://www.readwriteweb.com</uri>
    </author>
    
    <category term="Web 2.0 Business" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.readwriteweb.com/">
      <![CDATA[<blockquote><p><em>The necessary components of a mash-up according to the panelists are AJAX or a similar client-side technology, APIs in the backend (or RSS and/or scraping if need be - although some people argue scraping isn't truly Web 2.0), and a lot of work on the UI and data sets by the developer(s). Paul Rademacher mentioned there is still a lot of work to be done with the technologies - e.g. authentication. So it's early days yet for mash-ups on the Web.</em></p>

<p><em>As for mash-up business models, some of the suggestions were: advertising, lead generation and/or affiliates, transactional, subscription. [Full story at <a href="http://blogs.zdnet.com/web2explorer/?p=29">ZDNet</a>]</em></p></blockquote>

<p>I wrote up some notes I took at last week's Web 2.0 Conference, on the workshop Mash-ups 2.0: Where's the Business Model?. It was an enjoyable workshop, although I hope in a year's time we're able to look at business models for mash-ups that <b>don't</b> include maps ;-)</p>

<p>btw this post on R/WW is a blatent copy of <a href="http://weblog.infoworld.com/udell/2005/10/11.html#a1319">Jon Udell's strategy</a> in dealing with writing at two separate places online. I've been wrestling with this over the past month - how not to confuse people by having two blogs on the same general topic. R/WW is my hub of online activity, my online avatar in a lot of ways, but ZDNet helps pay my bills. So let's try this and see how it goes.</p>]]>
      
    </content>
  </entry>

</feed>