<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" 
      xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/rss_everywhere.php" />
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/atom.xml" />
  <id>tag:,2009:/1/tag:72.47.210.69,2005://1.4658-</id>
  <updated>2009-10-30T14:52:18Z</updated>
  <title>Comments for RSS Everywhere II - but where is Google?</title>
  
  <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 4.23-en</generator>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2005://1.4658</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/rss_everywhere.php" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=4658" title="RSS Everywhere II - but where is Google?" />
    <published>2005-11-30T21:12:11Z</published>
    <updated>2007-12-16T23:15:55Z</updated>
    <title>RSS Everywhere II - but where is Google?</title>
    <summary><![CDATA[Last night Yahoo! announced they are integrating RSS into their web mail and alerts products. As Scott Gatz explained in an interview with PodTech: Yahoo's plan, which started in January 2004 when they launched RSS in the My Yahoo portal, is to &quot;bring RSS to the masses&quot;. I liked how Ben Barren described this as...]]></summary>
    <author>
      <name>Richard MacManus</name>
      <uri>http://www.readwriteweb.com</uri>
    </author>
    
    <category term="Analysis / Strategy" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.readwriteweb.com/">
      <![CDATA[<p>Last night Yahoo! <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/11/29/rss-is-now-integrated-into-yahoo-mail-and-alerts/">announced</a> they are integrating RSS into their web mail and
alerts products. As <a href="http://www.scottgatz.com/blog/2005/11/29/yahoo-mails-full-post-rss-reader/">Scott Gatz</a> explained in an <a href="http://www.podtech.net/?p=229">interview
with PodTech</a>: Yahoo's plan, which started in January 2004 when they launched RSS
in the My Yahoo portal, is to &quot;bring RSS to the masses&quot;. I liked how <a href="http://benbarren.blogspot.com/2005/12/yahoo-to-own-rss-abcnbcfox-to-own.html">
Ben Barren described this</a> as Yahoo's 'RSS Everywhere' strategy. If that's not
Yahoo's slogan in regards to RSS, then it should be. Oh wait, Microsoft has <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/microsoft_embra.php">already
used it</a> - back in June 05 when they announced RSS would be integrated into
the Vista OS (then known as Longhorn). Microsoft has also since announced RSS
integration within Windows Live and a new RSS extension getting big wraps, <a href="http://blogs.zdnet.com/web2explorer/?p=63">
called SSE</a>. </p>
<p>Which brings me to my point - Yahoo and Microsoft are busy building out an 'RSS
Everywhere' strategy. What is Google doing with RSS? They toyed with integrating
RSS into Gmail - remember <a href="http://blog.outer-court.com/archive/2005-04-15-n70.html">Web
Clips</a>? Last month Google <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/google_rss_read.php"> released an RSS
Reader</a>, which turned out to be average by
industry standards. And they've implemented bits and pieces of RSS into Search and
Google News. But compare Google's clumsy RSS experiments with the total
acceptance of and immersion in RSS by Yahoo and Microsoft.</p>

<p>Watching Google and RSS
is like watching a high school student experiment with a chemistry set.
Meanwhile Yahoo and Microsoft are busy inserting RSS into their DNA.</p>
<p>As I wrote <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/rss_and_the_big.php">back
in April</a>, I think Google wants to <i>harness</i> RSS. Most of their huge take of advertising revenue comes
to them via webpages - their own pages, plus external webpages that use Google Adsense.
Google wants to ensure that huge revenue doesn't get siphoned off by RSS-izing
everything.&nbsp;The Gmail 'Web Clips' feature mentioned above <a href="http://www.evhead.com/2005/04/gmail-adds-feed-reading.asp">had
adverts</a> alternating with the content, so it was an unsubtle experiment at
monetizing RSS.</p>

<p>Perhaps Google should take a leaf from Yahoo and Microsoft's book and
start immersing itself in RSS, instead of trying to harness it. <a href="http://www.scripting.com/2005/11/30.html#When:12:44:44PM">As
Dave Winer mused today</a>, Google shouldn't try to lock in content. The value
of RSS is that it's the best form of content distribution we have on the Web
today. RSS - you're soaking in it. Hmmm, perhaps Yahoo should make <i>that</i>
their slogan?</p>]]>
      
    </content>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2005://1.4658-comment:36693</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2005://1.4658" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/rss_everywhere.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/rss_everywhere.php#c36693" />
    <title>Comment from Chris P. on 2005-12-01</title>
    <author>
        <name>Chris P.</name>
        <uri>http://www.pearsonified.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.pearsonified.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>LOVING the new layout. I always thought this site needed a design that would properly complement the great content, and it looks like you've jumped all over it. Excellent!</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2005-12-01T15:36:23Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2005://1.4658-comment:36694</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2005://1.4658" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/rss_everywhere.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/rss_everywhere.php#c36694" />
    <title>Comment from Phil Wilson on 2005-12-01</title>
    <author>
        <name>Phil Wilson</name>
        <uri>http://philwilson.org/blog/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://philwilson.org/blog/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Remember that Google gives an Atom feed for unread messages in your Gmail account, as well as per-label Atom feeds.</p>

<p>by the way, I couldn't sign in correctly with TypeKey, it said to let you know :)</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2005-12-01T15:49:47Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2005://1.4658-comment:36695</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2005://1.4658" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/rss_everywhere.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/rss_everywhere.php#c36695" />
    <title>Comment from rob rowntree on 2005-12-01</title>
    <author>
        <name>rob rowntree</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><a href="http://base.google.com/base/howtobulkupload.html" rel="nofollow"><a href="http://base.google.com/base/howtobulkupload.html" rel="nofollow">http://base.google.com/base/howtobulkupload.html</a></a></p>

<p>froogle and googlebase both moving to rss streaming delivery</p>

<p>if these adopt at a rate like Maps.google that would be something</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2005-12-01T23:31:08Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2005://1.4658-comment:36696</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2005://1.4658" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/rss_everywhere.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/rss_everywhere.php#c36696" />
    <title>Comment from Bruce on 2005-12-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>Bruce</name>
        <uri>http://www.1krg.com/search.php?id=39435&amp;said=&amp;qq=RSS</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.1krg.com/search.php?id=39435&amp;said=&amp;qq=RSS">
        <![CDATA[<p>I think, Google will make RSS not worse than at Yahoo and Microsoft, and it is possible and much bett. In due course...</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2005-12-13T23:23:47Z</published>
  </entry>

</feed>