<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" 
      xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/web_20_weekly_w_41.php" />
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/atom.xml" />
  <id>tag:,2009:/1/tag:72.47.210.69,2005://1.4620-</id>
  <updated></updated>
  <title>Comments for Web 2.0 Weekly Wrap-up, 31 Oct - 6 Nov 2005</title>
  
  <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 4.23-en</generator>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2005://1.4620</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/web_20_weekly_w_41.php" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=4620" title="Web 2.0 Weekly Wrap-up, 31 Oct - 6 Nov 2005" />
    <published>2005-11-07T09:25:41Z</published>
    <updated>2007-12-16T23:15:53Z</updated>
    <title>Web 2.0 Weekly Wrap-up, 31 Oct - 6 Nov 2005</title>
    <summary>This week: Microsoft Live, Flash Maps and the Mechanical Turk, Web 2.0 meet-ups
all over the world, 2.0 Blog of the Week - Supr.c.ilio.us.</summary>
    <author>
      <name>Richard MacManus</name>
      <uri>http://www.readwriteweb.com</uri>
    </author>
    
    <category term="Web 2.0 Weekly Wrap-Ups" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.readwriteweb.com/">
      <![CDATA[<p><b>This week:</b> Microsoft Live, Flash Maps and the Mechanical Turk, Web 2.0 meet-ups
all over the world, 2.0 Blog of the Week - Supr.c.ilio.us.</p>

<p><a href="http://www.webmail.us/">sponsored by:</a><br />
 <a href="http://www.webmail.us/" border="0"><img
src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/webmail_us.gif" border="0" alt="webmail.us"
width="400" height="60" /></a></p>

<h2>Microsoft Live wrap-up</h2>

<p>The big news of the week was <a
href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/002915.php">Microsoft's announcement</a> of <a
href="http://www.live.com">Windows Live</a> and <a
href="http://www.microsoft.com/office/officelive/default.mspx">Office Live</a>. My post
entitled <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/002917.php">Microsoft Livens Up
Web 2.0</a> summarized all the news and my thoughts. Here are some extras and links, to
wrap everything up for the week:</p>

<ul>
<li><a href="http://blogs.zdnet.com/web2explorer/?p=48">On ZDNet</a>, I compared the
'personalized start pages' of Microsoft, Google, Netvibes - and concluded that Netvibes
can teach the other two a few lessons. Microsoft's live.com site in particular needs a
lot of work.</li>

<li><a href="http://minimsft.blogspot.com/2005/11/its-live.html">Mini-Microsoft</a> was
uncharacteristically generous in his/her praise: "To me, we're filling the Alpha Geek
void for Microsoft technology. We're providing an alpha-geek portal and set of services
for them to build new, interesting results on-top of our services and gadgets and all
that other cool stuff."</li>

<li><a
href="http://www.nytimes.com/2005/11/02/technology/02soft.html?ei=5088&amp;en=2497094b62800dc0&amp;ex=1288587600&amp;adxnnl=1&amp;partner=rssnyt&amp;emc=rss&amp;adxnnlx=1130969670-dv0XCsyTg/bZm6Aq6K82lw">
Markoff at NY Times</a> echoed my own views: "... [Live is] an important step in
extending Microsoft's reach beyond the desktop PC to smart phones and other
Internet-connected devices."</li>

<li><a href="http://gigaom.com/2005/11/02/mapping-microsofts-competition/">Om Malik</a>
mapped Microsoft's competition and his post <a
href="http://gigaom.com/2005/11/04/what-do-macy-and-microsoft-live-have-in-common/">comparing
MS to Macys</a> is also worth a read.</li>

<li>A lot of designer folks rather unkindly <a
href="http://mhc.insidestretch.com/2005/11/03/the-presentation-zen-blog/">compared Bill
Gates presentation style to Steve Jobs</a> (no contest, of course - and that's the way it
should be).</li>

<li>Finally a big thanks to <a href="http://www.crunchnotes.com/?p=18">Mike Arrington</a>
and <a href="http://blogs.zdnet.com/BTL/index.php?p=2097">Dan Farber</a> for the
excellent real-time notes at Microsoft's announcement, also <a
href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/niallkennedy/">Niall Kennedy</a> for his outstanding
annotated photos of the event (I borrowed some <a
href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/michaelarrington/sets/1267546/">pics from Mike</a>
too).</li>
</ul>

<h2>Flash Maps and the Mechanical Turk</h2>

<p>No that's not the sequel to the Jude Law movie <a
href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0346156/">Sky Captain and the World of Tomorrow</a>. It
refers to the two other talking points of the week - Yahoo's new <a
href="http://maps.yahoo.com/beta">Flash-powered Maps product</a> and <a
href="http://www.mturk.com/mturk/welcome">Amazon's Mechanical Turk</a>. TechCrunch had
the scoop on <a
href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/11/02/new-yahoo-maps-shows-power-of-flash/">Yahoo
Maps</a> and also <a
href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/11/04/amazon-finally-shows-itself-as-the-matrix/">covered
the Turk</a>. Mike's been on top of his blogging game these past couple of
weeks!&nbsp;</p>

<p>Mechanical Turk is an Amazon.com web service that enables users to "complete simple
tasks that people do better than computers [and] get paid for it." It took me by surprise
because a) it was the first new thing we'd seen out of Amazon for some time; and b) what
an innovative thing it is too!</p>

<p>Amazon was one of the first 'Web 2.0' big companies to
emerge, in the mid-90's - if not <i>the first</i>. They were ahead of the curve in
rolling out large-scale user-generated content systems, affiliate services, and
APIs.&nbsp;So the Mechanical Turk may well represent the next generation of Web as Platform
systems. We won't know for sure until we see if people actually <i>use it</i>, but I'm pleased to
see that Amazon still has the developer edge to try new things.</p>

<h2>Web 2.0 meet-ups all over the world</h2>

<p>Gerald Bauer emailed me to advise of a free monthly Web 2.0 event series over in
<b>Canada</b> (Vancouver, BC) organized by the Vancouver Web 2.0 Forum. <a
href="http://van2.ca/event-november">Here are the details</a>.</p>

<p>Over in <b>the Valley</b>, there's an upcoming BrainJams event called <a
href="http://gutelius.blogspot.com/2005/11/next-brainjams-event-making-web-20.html">Making
Web 2.0 Relevant</a>. It's on 3 December at SRI in Menlo Park and the theme is
translating human needs into web 2.0. These are the folks who brought you&nbsp;<a
href="http://www.web2point1.org/">Web 2.1 in SF</a> and they're sponsored by <a
href="http://www.techcrunch.com">TechCrunch</a> and <a
href="http://www.zazzle.com">Zazzle</a> amongst others. I hope there'll be some serious
podcasting going on, so I can listen in!</p>

<p>Closer to home, my cousins in <b>Australia</b> are getting into the Web 2.0 BBQ
spirit. <a
href="http://benbarren.blogspot.com/2005/11/sophie-monk-and-melbourne-long-tail.html">Ben
Barren advises</a> of a Melbourne BBQ on 11 November, as part of the <a
href="http://longtailcamp.org/?HomePage">Long Tail Camp</a>. <a
href="http://tinfinger.blogspot.com/2005/11/come-on-mate-and-grab-plate.html">Paul
Montgomery discusses the beer etiquette</a> involved in this event:</p>

<blockquote>
<p>"The most popular beer at the event will be a key metric for the eventual fate of Web
2.0 in Australia. VB: not good, a sign of it being dull and low key. Stella: not the best
either, indicates too many dilettantes. Heineken: cripes mate, stick to Aussie beers ya
galah. Foster's: stop pandering to American stereotypes of Australia, no one drinks
Foster's here. Carlton Draught, Cooper's Pale Ale or Cascade Premium: now you're talking,
champ... dot com 2.0 millions await!"</p>
</blockquote>

<p>Strewth mate, I drink Stella Artois! I guess that makes me a <a
href="http://www.answers.com/dilettante">dilettante</a>. Oh well, put another shrimp on
the barbie and save a place for me at a BBQ soon. Melbourne is where Web 2.0 <b>is at</b>
in Australia, plus I've been there before and it's a great city. So I hope to visit again
in the near future.&nbsp;</p>

<h2>2.0 Blog of the Week</h2>

<p>I'm going to do something a bit different this week. Usually I do a Post of the Week,
but how about a Blog of the Week? This week I want to highlight <a
href="http://supr.c.ilio.us/blog/">Supr.c.ilio.us: The Blog</a>. In a phrase, these guys
are Snark 2.0. They keep us Web 2.0 pundits honest and make sure we don't take ourselves
too seriously.&nbsp;</p>

<p>I first noticed Supr.c.ilio.us a few weeks ago in one of my vanity feeds, when they
made some snarky remarks about me. So of course I had to subscribe. And I've since become
addicted to their fine brand of snark. Here's <a
href="http://supr.c.ilio.us/blog/2005/10/27/idiom-of-the-day-user-created-content/">one
of their recent posts</a>, a definition:</p>

<blockquote>
<p>"user created content<br />
 Abbreviation. Refers to users that do not receive health benefits, steady paycheck or
attend the company&rsquo;s x-mas party, yet are able to use a networked computer. Tracing
back to the days of AOL, the term has been made derogatory (wikipedia? that&rsquo;s user
created content!), only to be revived recently (we scale by aggregating user created
content globally and presenting it locally). Often found on CL, social networks, and
splogs."&nbsp;</p>
</blockquote>

<p>Also check out their meta tagging site, <a
href="http://supr.c.ilio.us/">Supr.c.ilio.us</a>. Keep up the great work guys.</p>

<p>That's a wrap for another week!</p>]]>
      
    </content>
  </entry>

</feed>