<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" 
      xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/rating_the_meme.php" />
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/atom.xml" />
  <id>tag:,2008:/1/tag:72.47.210.69,2006://1.4733-</id>
  <updated>2008-08-22T19:07:11Z</updated>
  <title>Comments for Rating the Meme Trackers - Memeorandum still tops, but Topix and TailRank up there too</title>
  
  <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 4.1</generator>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2006://1.4733</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/rating_the_meme.php" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=4733" title="Rating the Meme Trackers - Memeorandum still tops, but Topix and TailRank up there too" />
    <published>2006-02-06T21:14:57Z</published>
    <updated>2007-12-16T23:15:58Z</updated>
    <title>Rating the Meme Trackers - Memeorandum still tops, but Topix and TailRank up there too</title>
    <summary>TechCrunch recently rounded up a list of Memeorandum hunters, or what Don Dodge is calling meme trackers (I like that term). Seeing as I was one of the first off the blocks with a rave memeorandum review back in September 05, right behind Robert Scoble, and I&apos;ve been gushing about it ever since - I...</summary>
    <author>
      <name>Richard MacManus</name>
      <uri>http://www.readwriteweb.com</uri>
    </author>
    
    <category term="Filtering Services" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.readwriteweb.com/">
      <![CDATA[<p>TechCrunch recently rounded up a list of <a
href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/02/04/a-look-at-the-memeorandum-killers/">Memeorandum
hunters</a>, or what Don Dodge is calling <a
href="http://dondodge.typepad.com/the_next_big_thing/2006/02/meme_tracking_w.html">meme
trackers</a> (I like that term). Seeing as I was one of the first off the blocks with <a
href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/newlook_memeora.php">a rave memeorandum
review</a> back in September 05, right behind <a
href="http://radio.weblogs.com/0001011/2005/09/12.html#a11129">Robert Scoble</a>, and
I've been gushing about it ever since - I thought it's only fair for me to analyze the
raft of contenders that have arisen since then.&nbsp;</p>

<p>This whole 'space', of real-time news clustering, is one that I anticipate a lot of
growth in this year. As I wrote back in September:</p>

<blockquote><p>"My bet is that mainstream news media organizations will be beating a path to Gabe's
door to either invest in it or license the software."</p></blockquote>

<p>I'm actually somewhat surprised that mainstream media hasn't taken more notice of this
space already - perhaps they need to hire someone like me to keep on top of these 2.0
things for them ;-) Anywho, here's my impressions of the current crop of meme trackers,
using their Technology tracks as a comparison point.</p>

<p><b><a href="http://www.blogniscient.com">Blogniscient</a></b></p>

<p>Has 6 distinct categories so far, including a newly launched 'Television' category.
Plus 'World' and 'Health' are on the way apparently. Interface needs more work - they
don't cluster results and some topics appear more than once in different places - e.g.
currently Engadget's <a
href="http://www.engadget.com/2006/02/03/citizens-reversible-atomic-clock/">Citizen's
reversible atomic clock</a> post is at number 13, 14, 15 all at once.</p>

<p><b><a href="http://annotatedtimes.blogrunner.com/">Blogrunner</a></b></p>

<p>The Annotated New York Times tracks blog postings that cite articles published by The
New York Times. Interesting way to remix the NY Times and bring in external citations. I
especially like the "On the move..." column on the homepage, for stories that are
increasing in popularity. Has a large array of topics, but somehow the NY Times filter
makes me feel like I'm missing out on breaking news...</p>

<p><b><a href="http://www.blogsnow.com/">Blogsnow</a></b></p>

<p>Desperately needs to work on their layout - pretty plain list format. Also there is no
topic focus. Features I do like: most clicked on in BlogsNow; most linked to flickr
pages; most linked to in the IMDB (but why is Groundhog Day currently #2?!!); most linked
to wikipedia pages. All in all, some promising features - but needs more focus and better
layout.&nbsp;</p>

<p><b><a href="http://www.chuquet.com">Chuquet</a></b></p>

<p><img src="http://readwriteweb.com/images/chuquet.png" alt="chuquet" border="0" /></p>

<p>Nice layout, seems a little bit slower than tech.meme - e.g. Sifry's State of the
Blogosphere is number 7 here but currently #1 on meme. The inclusion of excerpts doesn't
really work for me - makes the page too busy (even though hidden behind an
expand/collapse button). I like the tag cloud and inclusion of Flickr pics.</p>

<p><b><a href="http://www.megite.com">Megite</a></b></p>

<p>Megite is very comprehensive, but I think it needs to find ways to reduce the
'busy-ness' of the page. The #1 FON story (at time of writing) totally dominates the page
and it took me 3-4 scrolls to get to number 2 on the list! Megite needs to learn how to
layout its clustering, a lesson which Memeorandum learnt back in September. You know,
people diss meme's layout - but when it comes to cluster layouts, Memeorandum is still
streets ahead of its competition.</p>

<p><b><a href="http://tech.memeorandum.com">Memeorandum</a></b></p>

<p><img src="http://readwriteweb.com/images/meme.png" alt="meme" border="0" /></p>

<p>Well I feel a bit guilty now for once again showing my bias towards Memeorandum. But
note that it's not a bias towards Gabe (who is a friend, I admit), but towards the
technology. It's just faster and better presented - currently - than its
competition.&nbsp;</p>

<p><b><a href="http://www.newroo.com">Newroo</a> (pre-launch)</b></p>

<p>er, nice kangaroo... Nothing else to report thus far.</p>

<p><b><a href="http://www.tailrank.com">Tailrank</a></b></p>

<p><img src="http://readwriteweb.com/images/tailrank.png" alt="tailrank"
border="0" /></p>

<p>Has Superbowl #1, Sifry #2, FON #3 - which is pretty good. I'd rate this number 3
behind Memeorandum and Topix.net (see below) right now, but again I have issues with the
layout. Too much information. The excerpts are a nice idea, and presented fairly well on
TailRank, but to be honest they quickly become a blur. My intention with a meme tracker
is to quickly scan information - and excerpts just get in the way. However TailRank at
least tries to minimize this... maybe just needs more refining.</p>

<p>I suspect it needs more topic focus too, but then it seems to be aiming for this with
its tagging feature. I dunno... I like TailRank and what it sets out to do, but I just
feel it isn't quite there yet.&nbsp;</p>

<p><b><a href="http://kitchen.technorati.com/explore/">Technorati Kitchen</a></b></p>

<p>Has a wide variety of topics, as you'd expect. Not really a clustering service as
such, so unfair to compare it to memeorandum or tailrank. Ranks articles by "Recent
Authority" by default, so is biased towards A-List blogs. But I use Technorati's tag
features quite often to find new stories, so for what it does Technorati Kitchen is very
useful.</p>

<p><b><a href="http://www.tinfinger.com/">Tinfinger</a> (pre-launch)</b></p>

<p>Empty pages currently. Hurry up Paul! Less talk, more action ;-) I know, pot calling
kettle black...</p>

<p><b><a href="http://www.topix.net/blogs">Topix.net</a></b></p>

<p><img src="http://readwriteweb.com/images/topix.png" alt="topix" border="0" /></p>

<p>My number 2 pick behind meme. I haven't written enough about Topix.net, but I love
this service. The mix of 'official' news and blogs is now very compelling. And the Tech
page for instance has a wide range of techie topics covered - Linux, security,
programming, etc. I give Topix.net high marks for coverage and it is also
presented nicely. If anything, I'd like to see more done with story clustering - especially now that it includes blogs. An under-rated resource, IMO.</p>

<p><b><a href="http://www.truthlaidbear.com/topics.php">TruthLaidBear</a></b></p>

<p>This is one of the forerunners of news clustering sites and is mainly focused on
politics and non-tech subjects. But the techie meme cluster servcies listed above could
take a few notes from TLB - nice 3-column layout on its topic pages, interesting use of
graphs too.</p>

<h2>Summary</h2>

<p>All in all, Memeorandum still comes out trumps in terms of clustering layout, speed
and relevancy. Topix.net and TailRank are strong services too. Also I suspect Chuquet and
Megite will pick up the pace once they've enhanced their interfaces. A very interesting space to watch!</p>]]>
      
    </content>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2006://1.4733-comment:36911</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2006://1.4733" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/rating_the_meme.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/rating_the_meme.php#c36911" />
    <title>Comment from Andreas Wacker on 2006-02-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>Andreas Wacker</name>
        <uri>http://www.BlogsNow.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.BlogsNow.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>The layout of BlogsNow is not an accident.<br />
It is just what I happen to like. </p>

<p>BTW: BlogsNow IS faster than any other of the tools.</p>

<p>The layout might look ugly to some people,<br />
but it's speed is unmatched. Hence the 'now' in the name.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2006-02-07T01:25:53Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2006://1.4733-comment:36912</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2006://1.4733" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/rating_the_meme.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/rating_the_meme.php#c36912" />
    <title>Comment from Rich Skrenta on 2006-02-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>Rich Skrenta</name>
        <uri>http://www.topix.net/blogs</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.topix.net/blogs">
        <![CDATA[<p>Oh man blogsnow *is* fast.  I like it...</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2006-02-07T05:16:35Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2006://1.4733-comment:36913</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2006://1.4733" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/rating_the_meme.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/rating_the_meme.php#c36913" />
    <title>Comment from Richard MacManus on 2006-02-07</title>
    <author>
        <name>Richard MacManus</name>
        <uri>http://readwriteweb.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://readwriteweb.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>OK, but note that I never said Blogsnow isn't fast :-)</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2006-02-07T08:15:42Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2006://1.4733-comment:36914</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2006://1.4733" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/rating_the_meme.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/rating_the_meme.php#c36914" />
    <title>Comment from Kevin Burton on 2006-02-07</title>
    <author>
        <name>Kevin Burton</name>
        <uri>http://tailrank.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://tailrank.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>Hey.  Thanks for the feedback.  For the record I don't feel like we're "there yet" either.  We're not 1.0 yet but we plan on being there within 30 days.  </p>

<p>We're also working on a UI refresher and we'll be deploying usability updates twice a week based on user feedback.</p>

<p>We also have a new robot update pending which will yield faster meme indexing and higher quality results.</p>

<p>We're also working a few surprises for 1.0 so that should be fun as well.</p>

<p>I think one key thing to point out is that we've come this far to challenge the big boys in only 3 months.  </p>

<p>We're trying to turn up the volume so stay tuned :)</p>

<p>Onward!</p>

<p>Kevin</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2006-02-07T08:19:50Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2006://1.4733-comment:36915</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2006://1.4733" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/rating_the_meme.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/rating_the_meme.php#c36915" />
    <title>Comment from Paul Montgomery on 2006-02-07</title>
    <author>
        <name>Paul Montgomery</name>
        <uri>http://tinfinger.blogspot.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://tinfinger.blogspot.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>Finish Noodly, pot!</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2006-02-07T10:40:58Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2006://1.4733-comment:36916</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2006://1.4733" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/rating_the_meme.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/rating_the_meme.php#c36916" />
    <title>Comment from Paul Montgomery on 2006-02-07</title>
    <author>
        <name>Paul Montgomery</name>
        <uri>http://tinfinger.blogspot.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://tinfinger.blogspot.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>Oh wait, Noodly is Pete Cashmore's thing. What was yours again? It seems everyone's launching an aggregator these days.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2006-02-07T10:41:44Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2006://1.4733-comment:36917</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2006://1.4733" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/rating_the_meme.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/rating_the_meme.php#c36917" />
    <title>Comment from Mark Wilson on 2006-02-07</title>
    <author>
        <name>Mark Wilson</name>
        <uri>http://reblogger.wordpress.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://reblogger.wordpress.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>Thanks for this post, it was very informative.  I have blogged on the meme concept and linked to you here:  <a href="http://reblogger.wordpress.com/2006/02/08/" rel="nofollow"><a href="http://reblogger.wordpress.com/2006/02/08/" rel="nofollow">http://reblogger.wordpress.com/2006/02/08/</a></a><br />
tracking-memes-and-our-world-views/</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2006-02-08T07:41:45Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2006://1.4733-comment:36918</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2006://1.4733" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/rating_the_meme.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/rating_the_meme.php#c36918" />
    <title>Comment from Matthew on 2006-02-11</title>
    <author>
        <name>Matthew</name>
        <uri>http://www.megite.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.megite.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>Check out Megite again. It just released a new UI. It is pretty neat and cool. Also it can create personalized version if you can send them an OPML file.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2006-02-12T06:52:01Z</published>
  </entry>

</feed>