<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" 
      xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/why_google_is_e.php" />
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/atom.xml" />
  <id>tag:,2008:/1/tag:72.47.210.69,2006://1.4828-</id>
  <updated>2008-09-24T12:25:30Z</updated>
  <title>Comments for Why Google is extending RSS</title>
  
  <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 4.1</generator>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2006://1.4828</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/why_google_is_e.php" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=4828" title="Why Google is extending RSS" />
    <published>2006-04-21T21:50:52Z</published>
    <updated>2007-12-16T23:16:03Z</updated>
    <title>Why Google is extending RSS</title>
    <summary>My ZDNet post today explores the reasons behind Google&apos;s new syndication format, GData. Like most people, Jeff Jarvis isn&apos;t sure what this means - and neither is Dave Winer. I&apos;m in the same boat, but what I do know is that Google has taken a sudden interest in extending RSS and Atom. Check out this...</summary>
    <author>
      <name>Richard MacManus</name>
      <uri>http://www.readwriteweb.com</uri>
    </author>
    
    <category term="Google" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.readwriteweb.com/">
      <![CDATA[<p>My <a href="http://blogs.zdnet.com/web2explorer/?p=165">ZDNet post today</a> explores the reasons behind Google's new syndication format, <a href="http://code.google.com/apis/gdata/index.html">GData</a>. Like most people, <a href="http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/04/21/google-syndication/">Jeff Jarvis</a> isn't sure what this means - and neither is <a href="http://www.scripting.com/2006/04/21.html#When:11:34:43AM">Dave
Winer</a>. I'm in the same boat, but what I do know is that Google has taken a
sudden interest in <b>extending RSS and Atom</b>. Check out this Google Base
documentation, <a href="http://base.google.com/base/rss_specs.html">for RSS 2.0</a>
and <a href="http://base.google.com/base/howtobulkupload.html">for all
syndication formats</a>. This is all about enabling bulk upload of items into <a href="http://base.google.com">Google
Base</a>, which you'll recall is Google's <a href="http://blogs.zdnet.com/web2explorer/?p=153">potential
giant database</a> of structured data on the Web. Google is obviously eyeing RSS
(or syndication in general) as a means of getting people to upload data to
Google Base. But why did Google feel the need to create a new protocol, called GData?</p>
<p>My initial reaction was that GData is a way to mix RSS/Atom with their APIs,
in order to better integrate their <a href="http://blogs.zdnet.com/web2explorer/?p=158">increasing
number of web applications</a>. I'm not sure if this points to less of a walled
garden, or paradoxically <i>more of one</i> because Google is defining the
protocol now.</p>
<p>[<a href="http://blogs.zdnet.com/web2explorer/?p=165">Full story on ZDNet...</a>]</p>]]>
      
    </content>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2006://1.4828-comment:37260</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2006://1.4828" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/why_google_is_e.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/why_google_is_e.php#c37260" />
    <title>Comment from James Snell on 2006-04-21</title>
    <author>
        <name>James Snell</name>
        <uri>http://www.snellspace.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.snellspace.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>Minor point, GData isn't really a new protocol.  It's an implementation/specialization of the Atom Publishing Protocol.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2006-04-21T23:39:31Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2006://1.4828-comment:37261</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2006://1.4828" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/why_google_is_e.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/why_google_is_e.php#c37261" />
    <title>Comment from Richard MacManus on 2006-04-21</title>
    <author>
        <name>Richard MacManus</name>
        <uri>http://readwriteweb.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://readwriteweb.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>Interesting, because Google is calling it a protocol: "The Google data APIs ("GData" for short) provide a simple standard protocol for reading and writing data on the web."</p>

<p>It seems to me to be an extension of the Atom Publishing Protocol, rather than just an implementation. But I'm by no means a tech expert on this.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2006-04-21T23:45:52Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2006://1.4828-comment:37262</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2006://1.4828" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/why_google_is_e.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/why_google_is_e.php#c37262" />
    <title>Comment from Michael Fagan on 2006-04-21</title>
    <author>
        <name>Michael Fagan</name>
        <uri>http://www.faganfinder.com/wp/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.faganfinder.com/wp/">
        <![CDATA[<p>I guess that depends how you define "protocol"... personally I wouldn't get hung up on the label.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2006-04-22T00:22:05Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2006://1.4828-comment:37263</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2006://1.4828" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/why_google_is_e.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/why_google_is_e.php#c37263" />
    <title>Comment from Richard MacManus on 2006-04-21</title>
    <author>
        <name>Richard MacManus</name>
        <uri>http://readwriteweb.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://readwriteweb.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>Yep good point Michael. My main interest is in *what* GData will be used for.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2006-04-22T00:23:29Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2006://1.4828-comment:37264</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2006://1.4828" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/why_google_is_e.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/why_google_is_e.php#c37264" />
    <title>Comment from l.m.orchard on 2006-04-21</title>
    <author>
        <name>l.m.orchard</name>
        <uri>http://decafbad.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://decafbad.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>The protocol is HTTP - GET / PUT / POST / DELETE (in other words, CRUD).  </p>

<p>The payload is Atom, chosen because it happens to do lists of things really well.  </p>

<p>The list items carried in GData Atom are the interesting things - they'll vary according to the application.  In the case of Google Calendar, each Atom entry contains a calendar event.</p>

<p>So, in a nutshell, GData is HTTP-based CRUD using Atom entries to represent discrete records.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2006-04-22T03:49:34Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2006://1.4828-comment:37265</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2006://1.4828" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/why_google_is_e.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/why_google_is_e.php#c37265" />
    <title>Comment from Alper on 2006-04-24</title>
    <author>
        <name>Alper</name>
        <uri>http://alper.nl</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://alper.nl">
        <![CDATA[<p>There is really nothing sudden about this. They have been busy making big web enabled database clusters and helping define the Atom protocol.</p>

<p>This meshes perfectly with all that.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2006-04-24T22:25:53Z</published>
  </entry>

</feed>