<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" 
      xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/digg_stats.php" />
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/atom.xml" />
  <id>tag:,2009:/1/tag:72.47.210.69,2006://1.4916-</id>
  <updated>2009-10-30T14:54:17Z</updated>
  <title>Comments for Digg stats analysis</title>
  
  <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 4.23-en</generator>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2006://1.4916</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/digg_stats.php" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=4916" title="Digg stats analysis" />
    <published>2006-07-18T10:04:29Z</published>
    <updated>2007-12-16T23:16:09Z</updated>
    <title>Digg stats analysis</title>
    <summary>Digg.com is not only a thriving community and great source for news, it&apos;s also an increasingly influential website for bloggers and website owners. It can be a heavy driver of revenue-generating traffic and can also help make your website viral (= popular). Given its growing importance then, I thought I&apos;d investigate digg&apos;s stats and identify...</summary>
    <author>
      <name>Richard MacManus</name>
      <uri>http://www.readwriteweb.com</uri>
    </author>
    
    <category term="Statistics" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.readwriteweb.com/">
      <![CDATA[<p><img vspace="0" hspace="5" border="0" align="left" title="digg_logo.png"
alt="digg_logo.png" src="http://blogs.zdnet.com/images/digg_logo.png" /><a
href="http://www.digg.com">Digg.com</a> is not only a thriving community and great source
for news, it's also an increasingly influential website for bloggers and website owners.
It can be a heavy driver of revenue-generating traffic and can also help make your
website viral (= popular). Given its growing importance then, I thought I'd investigate
digg's stats and identify the main trends. Let's look at the official dig.com stats
first, then turn our attention to a new (unofficial) site call duggtrends.</p>

<h2>Top Diggers data&nbsp;</h2>

<p>A page on digg.com called <a href="http://digg.com/topusers">Top Diggers</a> shows
that a select group of digg users are highly influential. These top diggers have a higher
chance of getting a story digged to the homepage than other users. Unsurprisingly Kevin
Rose is right at the top, with a whopping 119 of his 120 submitted stories making it to
the homepage (he has a 99% "Popular Ratio")! What was the single story that *didn't* make
it, I wonder?&nbsp;</p>

<p>If you order the results by 'Most Submitted', you'll note that a number of these heavy
submitters have high Popular Ratios. Albertpacino has a 31% ratio (800 of 2570
submitted), BloodJunkie 26%, gwjc 24%, digitalgopher 36%, dirtyfratboy 37%, and so on.
All of these folks have submitted over 1000 stories. I'm pretty unsurprised by these
figures however, because it is a community site after all. So it's only natural that
friends will digg each others stories.&nbsp;</p>

<h2>Top digg blogs and sites&nbsp;</h2>

<p>Digg users also have their favored blogs and websites, which get a disproportionate
amount of attention than other less fortunate sites (alas, I'm one of the latter). For
example, <a
href="http://www.digg.com/search?area=all&amp;age=7&amp;sort=new&amp;s=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.appleinsider.com&amp;submit=Search">
AppleInsider</a> has had at least 4 homepage diggs in the past week. A lot of times, the
favored sites get dugg very very quickly by digg users. The main problem with that is
that the original source for a story often gets overlooked - and the popular site garners
all the diggs instead. I speak from <a
href="http://digg.com/design/New_Yahoo_Home_Page_Goes_Live_Today">recent experience</a>
:-)</p>

<h2>Most digged days</h2>

<p>A site called <a href="http://diggtrends.com/">duggtrends</a> (but the URL is
diggtrends.com!?) is tracking other digg data. According to <a
href="http://www.diggtrends.com/stats.aspx">duggtrends' stats</a>, Sunday is the least
active day and Thursday the most active. Apparently most of the digging by users happens
during office hours, US time. So duggtrends estimates 9:00 AM EST as the best time to
submit a story.&nbsp;</p>

<h2>Stories to frontpage ratios</h2>

<p><a
href="http://www.diggtrends.com/stats.aspx">Duggtrends says</a> the percentage of submitted stories that make it to the digg homepage
during the week is around 15-19% (using Wed-Thu as a guide). However those particular
stats in Table 1 don't seem to correlate to the much lower 'stories-to-front-page' ratios
in Table 4??</p>

<h2>Categories</h2>

<p>Duggtrends also analyzes the new categories, introduced when <a
href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/digg_30_expands.php">digg version 3 was
released</a>. Unsurprisingly, "Tech Industry News" still dominates - it had 2184 stories
submitted to it in one week - "World News" was the second-most popular category with
1287. But note this comment from duggtrends:</p>

<blockquote>
<p>"Stories submitted in this category probably will have fewer chances to make it to
FrontPage. Most of the time these stories get pushed back in Upcoming Stories within few
minutes."</p>
</blockquote>

<p>Indeed the stats do show that only 120 of the Tech News stories made it to the
homepage (just 5.5% of the stories submitted to that category).&nbsp;</p>

<p>Over time, as digg V3 matures, we may see the non-tech categories increase in
popularity. Certainly digg's owners will be hoping so.</p>

<h2>Summary</h2>

<p>So an interesting look at the world of digg. If you have further digg data or
anecdotes to share, feel free to leave a comment. Oh and for the love of TBL, will
someone please digg this post! ;-)</p>]]>
      
    </content>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2006://1.4916-comment:37976</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2006://1.4916" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/digg_stats.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/digg_stats.php#c37976" />
    <title>Comment from Robert on 2006-07-18</title>
    <author>
        <name>Robert</name>
        <uri>http://www.blueace.nl</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.blueace.nl">
        <![CDATA[<p>Did you see <a href="http://diggview.com" rel="nofollow">DiggView</a> already? It's a really quick way to get an overview per category on what's hot on Digg.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2006-07-18T10:25:05Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2006://1.4916-comment:37977</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2006://1.4916" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/digg_stats.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/digg_stats.php#c37977" />
    <title>Comment from karl long on 2006-07-18</title>
    <author>
        <name>karl long</name>
        <uri>http://blog.experiencecurve.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blog.experiencecurve.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>Looks like it's dugg, and has 6 diggs at this point. I've never got anything more tha 20 diggs :-)</p>

<p>K</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2006-07-18T11:44:08Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2006://1.4916-comment:37978</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2006://1.4916" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/digg_stats.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/digg_stats.php#c37978" />
    <title>Comment from Richard MacManus on 2006-07-18</title>
    <author>
        <name>Richard MacManus</name>
        <uri>http://readwriteweb.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://readwriteweb.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the tip Robert, that is a useful site. At first I thought it was part of digg.com, as it has the same design. But apparently it's another unaffiliated one (like duggtrends).</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2006-07-18T11:49:46Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2006://1.4916-comment:37979</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2006://1.4916" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/digg_stats.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/digg_stats.php#c37979" />
    <title>Comment from Eric Allam on 2006-07-18</title>
    <author>
        <name>Eric Allam</name>
        <uri>http://www.52reviews.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.52reviews.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>Good article, to help get your posts dugg, try out <a href="http://diggtheblog.blogspot.com/2006/07/integrating-digg-within-your-website.html" rel="nofollow">Integrating digg on your posts</a>.  Maybe then you will get your wish.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2006-07-18T15:04:35Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2006://1.4916-comment:37980</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2006://1.4916" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/digg_stats.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/digg_stats.php#c37980" />
    <title>Comment from DuggTrends on 2006-07-18</title>
    <author>
        <name>DuggTrends</name>
        <uri>http://diggtrends.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://diggtrends.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>Be carefull, might not be a good idea to talk about digg stats. digg team might block your site as you are providing too much information to users (as they did it to our site).</p>

<p>-duggtrends team</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2006-07-18T18:27:51Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2006://1.4916-comment:37981</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2006://1.4916" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/digg_stats.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/digg_stats.php#c37981" />
    <title>Comment from chris on 2006-07-19</title>
    <author>
        <name>chris</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>You provide some interesting data here, but I think you miss one very important point... in your opening paragraph, you say "[digg] can be a heavy driver of revenue-generating traffic." But you never quantify that. How much traffic can a homepage placement on digg bring to a site?</p>

<p>It turns out it's not that much. I've pulled some traffic reports for digg referrals... a few stories published by the website where I work have made it to the digg homepage. It's fewer than 10,000 referrals for a single homepage placement. That may be a lot of traffic for a blog or a homegrown website, but it's nothing for a major website.</p>

<p>We have a theory: Digg users read the headline and description, some participate in the comment discussion, but very few are actually clicking thru to the articles.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2006-07-19T14:24:23Z</published>
  </entry>

</feed>