<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" 
      xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/microsoft_plans_web-based_works_suite.php" />
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/atom.xml" />
  <id>tag:,2008:/1/tag:72.47.210.69,2006://1.5029-</id>
  <updated>2008-05-09T18:18:55Z</updated>
  <title>Comments for Microsoft Plans Web-based Works Suite - Including Word Processing And Spreadsheets</title>
  
  <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 4.1</generator>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2006://1.5029</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/microsoft_plans_web-based_works_suite.php" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=5029" title="Microsoft Plans Web-based Works Suite - Including Word Processing And Spreadsheets" />
    <published>2006-09-22T12:55:20Z</published>
    <updated>2007-12-16T23:16:20Z</updated>
    <title>Microsoft Plans Web-based Works Suite - Including Word Processing And Spreadsheets</title>
    <summary>In the clearest sign yet that the big guns are preparing to step up the battle for Web Office, Microsoft has said it is considering releasing a version of Microsoft Works (the poor cousin of Microsoft Office) as a web suite. The desktop version of Works retails for $50 and includes a calendar, word processor,...</summary>
    <author>
      <name>Richard MacManus</name>
      <uri>http://www.readwriteweb.com</uri>
    </author>
    
    <category term="Web Office" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.readwriteweb.com/">
      <![CDATA[<p><img border="0" src="http://static.flickr.com/88/249710542_86c530a3b9.jpg?v=0"
alt="microsoft works" align="left" hspace="5" vspace="5" />In the clearest sign yet that
the big guns are preparing to step up the battle for Web Office, Microsoft <a
href="http://today.reuters.com/news/articlenews.aspx?type=internetNews&amp;storyID=2006-09-22T010709Z_01_N21422270_RTRUKOC_0_US-MICROSOFT-WORKS.xml">
has said</a> it is considering releasing a version of Microsoft Works (the poor cousin of
Microsoft Office) as a web suite. The desktop version of <a
href="http://www.microsoft.com/products/works/default.mspx">Works</a> retails for $50 and
includes a calendar, word processor, spreadsheets, Web Browser and e-mail. While its
currently positioned as a home productivity toolset (to do your accounts, write letters,
etc), it could pretty easily be re-positioned as a (small) business web office suite.</p>

<p>In any case - because Works includes basic word processing and spreadsheet software,
to web-enable that and bundle it as a suite would be a step above what <i>both</i>
Microsoft and Google currently offer. Right now Microsoft has <a
href="http://officelive.microsoft.com/">Office Live</a> (web hosting, email, project
collaboration) and Google offers <a href="https://www.google.com/a/">Apps For Your
Domain</a> (email, IM, calendar and website creator).</p>

<p>Microsoft's planned web-based Works would be a free package, supported by advertising.
As <a
href="http://today.reuters.com/news/articlenews.aspx?type=internetNews&amp;storyID=2006-09-22T010709Z_01_N21422270_RTRUKOC_0_US-MICROSOFT-WORKS.xml&amp;pageNumber=1&amp;imageid=&amp;cap=&amp;sz=13&amp;WTModLoc=NewsArt-C1-ArticlePage1">
Reuters put it</a>:</p>

<blockquote>
<p>"[Microsoft] faces a growing pack of Web-based competitors -- led by Google -- that is
offering similar [office] technology for free with a business model that makes money off
advertising.</p>

<p>The world's largest software maker is now mulling how it can move Microsoft Works, a
basic suite of business software that often comes preloaded on inexpensive consumer PCs,
onto the Web as part of its growing stable of free online services."</p>
</blockquote>

<p><img border="0" src="http://static.flickr.com/81/249711406_c5833b8290_m.jpg"
alt="google apps" align="right" hspace="5" vspace="5" width="164" height="150" />I think
this is a wise move by Microsoft to pre-empt Google's upcoming Web Office suite. It
clearly won't affect sales of their flagship MS Office, as the functionality is much
richer in the desktop version - even more so when Vista and Office 2007 are released.
Works is very basic by comparision - <i>but</i> it does have word processing and
spreadsheets.</p>

<p>On the other hand Google will probably easily trump a web-based Works, once they
package up Writely and Google Spreadsheets into a proper suite. So far there have only
been hints that Google will take that next step - perhaps they're still busy working on
the business models for such a move.</p>

<p>All in all, things are starting to get interesting in the Web Office space. I wouldn't
mind betting that Google pushes forward whatever secret plan they have for a full office
suite, now that Microsoft has made noises about webifying word processing and
spreadsheets.</p>

<p><b>See also:</b> <a href="http://blogs.zdnet.com/web2explorer/?p=269">Google Office: a
close-up look</a> and <a href="http://blogs.zdnet.com/web2explorer/?page_id=268">image
gallery of Google office apps</a>.</p>]]>
      
    </content>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2006://1.5029-comment:39236</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2006://1.5029" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/microsoft_plans_web-based_works_suite.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/microsoft_plans_web-based_works_suite.php#c39236" />
    <title>Comment from Alex Iskold on 2006-09-22</title>
    <author>
        <name>Alex Iskold</name>
        <uri>http://www.adaptiveblue.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.adaptiveblue.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>Its interesting that they are still thinking MS Works vs. MS Office for online. </p>

<p>I think it might be much harder sell, because people are used to that when they upgrade online, they just get more features not a totally different product.</p>

<p>Alex</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2006-09-22T13:23:21Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2006://1.5029-comment:39237</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2006://1.5029" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/microsoft_plans_web-based_works_suite.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/microsoft_plans_web-based_works_suite.php#c39237" />
    <title>Comment from Antoine of MMM on 2006-09-22</title>
    <author>
        <name>Antoine of MMM</name>
        <uri>http://mobileministrymagazine.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://mobileministrymagazine.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>Works as a hybrid office app (work offline but collab and can do online via Windows Live) would be a nice and slick seller for them. It would steal the low end from MS office, and make ODMs think about bunding MS products diffently, but this would be a good move for MS</p>

<p>IMO, works was always too light for use, although it could work as a pseudo office in some applications.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2006-09-22T16:29:34Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2006://1.5029-comment:39238</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2006://1.5029" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/microsoft_plans_web-based_works_suite.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/microsoft_plans_web-based_works_suite.php#c39238" />
    <title>Comment from Sholom Sandalow on 2006-09-22</title>
    <author>
        <name>Sholom Sandalow</name>
        <uri>http://www.gourmetpixel.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.gourmetpixel.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>I just recently switched to Google calendar from Yahoo.  Boy is there a real deifference.  I can't wait for more web based office functionality from Google, and I'm curious to experience Microsoft's version as well.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2006-09-22T16:30:13Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2006://1.5029-comment:39239</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2006://1.5029" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/microsoft_plans_web-based_works_suite.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/microsoft_plans_web-based_works_suite.php#c39239" />
    <title>Comment from Emre Sokullu on 2006-09-22</title>
    <author>
        <name>Emre Sokullu</name>
        <uri>http://emresokullu.com/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://emresokullu.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>I wonder how Google will integrate Writely and their other office services. Writely is a whole different architecture; first of all it's Microsoft based; so this is not only a look'n feel issue. From this point of view, MS is already one step ahead, because they'll be offering a unique experience across all office suite applications and this experience will be the one that you are already used to.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2006-09-23T02:53:41Z</published>
  </entry>

</feed>