<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" 
      xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/the_future_of_the_internet.php" />
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/atom.xml" />
  <id>tag:,2009:/1/tag:72.47.210.69,2006://1.5034-</id>
  <updated>2009-10-30T14:53:56Z</updated>
  <title>Comments for The Future of the Internet (sounds like my favorite sci fi books and movies)</title>
  
  <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 4.23-en</generator>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2006://1.5034</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/the_future_of_the_internet.php" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=5034" title="The Future of the Internet (sounds like my favorite sci fi books and movies)" />
    <published>2006-09-25T13:50:45Z</published>
    <updated>2007-12-16T23:16:21Z</updated>
    <title>The Future of the Internet (sounds like my favorite sci fi books and movies)</title>
    <summary> Pew has released its analysis of how the Internet will evolve over the next 14 or so years (2020). I&apos;m inclined to agree with Om Malik that the conclusions about the technology are rather obvious: &quot;a global, low-cost network will be thriving in 2020&quot;, which will bring about a &quot;&apos;flattening&apos; of the world&quot;. You...</summary>
    <author>
      <name>Richard MacManus</name>
      <uri>http://www.readwriteweb.com</uri>
    </author>
    
    <category term="Web Theory" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.readwriteweb.com/">
      <![CDATA[<p><img border="0" src="http://static.flickr.com/120/252370185_1365d80ea8.jpg?v=0"
alt="matrix world" /></p>

<p>Pew has released <a
href="http://www.pewinternet.org/PPF/r/188/report_display.asp">its analysis</a>
of how the Internet will evolve over the next 14 or so years (2020). I'm inclined to
agree <a
href="http://broadband.gigaom.com/2006/09/24/for-pew-the-future-of-internet-is-obvious/">with
Om Malik</a> that the conclusions about the technology are rather obvious: "a global,
low-cost network will be thriving in 2020", which will bring about a "'flattening' of the
world". You don't need to be Stanley Kubrick to figure that out.</p>

<p>The part I enjoyed the most was the section labeled: 'Thinking ahead to 2020: Some
revealing quotations and predictions from the thousands of answers that were submitted to
open-ended questions in the survey.'</p>

<p>I don't know if it was just me, but most of the predictions sounded remarkably like
the plots or themes of famous sci-fi books or movies...</p>

<p>Some took inspiration from The Matrix movie...</p>

<blockquote>
<p>"The evolution of smart machines: &ldquo;Fear of enslavement by our creations is an
old fear, and a literary tritism. But I fear something worse and much more likely &ndash;
that sometime after 2020 our machines will become intelligent, evolve rapidly, and end up
treating us as pets. We can at least take comfort that there is one worse fate &ndash;
becoming food &ndash; that mercifully is highly unlikely.&rdquo; &ndash; Paul Saffo,
forecaster and director of The Institute for the Future"</p>
</blockquote>

<p>Others took their cue from 2001: A Space Odyssey...</p>

<blockquote>
<p>"&ldquo;Until testing, bug fixing, user interfaces, usefulness and basic application
by subjectmatter experts is given a higher priority than pure programmer skill, we are
totally in danger of evolving into an out-of-control situation with autonomous
technology.&rdquo; &ndash; Elle Tracy, president of The Results Group"</p>
</blockquote>

<p>There was the obligatory William Gibson-inspired Virtual Reality fantasy:</p>

<blockquote>
<p>"The allure of virtual reality: &ldquo;A human's desire is to reinvent himself, live
out his fantasies, overindulge; addiction will definitely increase. Whole
communities/subcultures, which even today are a growing faction, will materialise. We may
see a vast blurring of virtual/real reality with many participants living an in-effect
secluded lifestyle. Only in the online world will they participate in any form of human
interaction.&rdquo; &ndash; Robert Eller, technology consultant"</p>
</blockquote>

<p>Even the boardgame Monopoly was evoked...</p>

<blockquote>
<p>"How information disseminates: &ldquo;Profit motives will impede data flow &hellip;
Networks will conform to the public utility model, with stakeholders in generation,
transmission, and distribution. Companies playing in each piece of the game will enact
roadblocks to collect what they see as their fair share of tariff revenue.&rdquo; &ndash;
Peter Kim, senior analyst, Forrester Research"</p>
</blockquote>

<p>But don't get me wrong, I love reading this stuff! It's just that I usually get my fix
of such content from sci-fi books and movies :-)</p>

<p><a href="http://www.markeedragon.com/screenshots/showphoto.php/photo/5404"><i>Pic
credit</i></a></p>]]>
      
    </content>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2006://1.5034-comment:39251</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2006://1.5034" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/the_future_of_the_internet.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/the_future_of_the_internet.php#c39251" />
    <title>Comment from Kevin at TasteTV.com on 2006-09-25</title>
    <author>
        <name>Kevin at TasteTV.com</name>
        <uri>http://www.TasteTV.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.TasteTV.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>We have found that some analysts who predict the future and impact of the Internet are not very far thinking or accurate and others are. For example, Regic McKEnna (sic) was very accurate in his 1997 book, REAL TIME, and when you read it in 2006 it's as relevant and timely as it was 9-10 years ago when he wrote it (from Kevin at TasteTV, <a href="http://www.TasteTV.com)" rel="nofollow"><a href="http://www.TasteTV.com)" rel="nofollow">http://www.TasteTV.com)</a></a></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2006-09-25T15:14:20Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2006://1.5034-comment:39252</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2006://1.5034" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/the_future_of_the_internet.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/the_future_of_the_internet.php#c39252" />
    <title>Comment from Nik Cubrilovic on 2006-09-25</title>
    <author>
        <name>Nik Cubrilovic</name>
        <uri>http://www.nik.com.au</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.nik.com.au">
        <![CDATA[<p>"You don't need to be Stanley Kubrick to figure that out."</p>

<p>Funny how he gets the credit for 2001 now :)</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2006-09-25T18:11:22Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2006://1.5034-comment:39253</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2006://1.5034" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/the_future_of_the_internet.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/the_future_of_the_internet.php#c39253" />
    <title>Comment from Mikael Bergkvist on 2006-09-25</title>
    <author>
        <name>Mikael Bergkvist</name>
        <uri>http://www.xinteleport.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.xinteleport.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>The future will look exactly the same.<br />
Boring, but true.<br />
This is 2006, and I remember 1985, when all this was sci-fi.<br />
Nothing is as we thought back then, infact, it's not very different at all from as it where back then.<br />
- We have more toys, that's all.</p>

<p>So my prediction for 2020 is: The same, except even more toys, but the same political mess, same stupid wars, same celebs doing the same stupid things.. and more predictions of a glorious new 2100.<br />
*Sigh*</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2006-09-25T20:50:38Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2006://1.5034-comment:39254</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2006://1.5034" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/the_future_of_the_internet.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/the_future_of_the_internet.php#c39254" />
    <title>Comment from Terry Xu on 2006-09-25</title>
    <author>
        <name>Terry Xu</name>
        <uri>http://kunalu.com/blog</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://kunalu.com/blog">
        <![CDATA[<p>Predictions on development of technology were never accurate, many not even close. </p>

<p>From the pure technology perspective (in comparing to social changes), I think all the essential and developing web languages, from html, css to svg, xslt, will keep evolving, to facilitate web-based application development. Browsers should face significant capability improvements too.</p>

<p>Well, there is always so much things people can talk about the future. After all, it's good that there is still space for our imagination to go wild.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2006-09-25T20:51:57Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2006://1.5034-comment:39255</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2006://1.5034" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/the_future_of_the_internet.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/the_future_of_the_internet.php#c39255" />
    <title>Comment from Richard MacManus on 2006-09-25</title>
    <author>
        <name>Richard MacManus</name>
        <uri>http://readwriteweb.com/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://readwriteweb.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Touche Nik! :-) In my defence I am a huge fan of the movie (2001), but for some reason I've never read the book.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2006-09-25T22:40:25Z</published>
  </entry>

</feed>