<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" 
      xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/freenigma_email_privacy.php" />
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/atom.xml" />
  <id>tag:,2008:/1/tag:72.47.210.69,2006://1.5103-</id>
  <updated>2008-08-07T05:07:12Z</updated>
  <title>Comments for freenigma: Encryption For Web-Based E-mail</title>
  
  <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 4.1</generator>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2006://1.5103</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/freenigma_email_privacy.php" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=5103" title="freenigma: Encryption For Web-Based E-mail" />
    <published>2006-10-23T23:19:13Z</published>
    <updated>2007-12-16T23:16:27Z</updated>
    <title>freenigma: Encryption For Web-Based E-mail</title>
    <summary>freenigma is a Firefox plug-in that offers e-mail encryption to a whole range of Web email systems - including Gmail, Yahoo!Mail and Hotmail/MSN. It is a product of Germany-based freiheit.com. freenigma came out of public beta at the end of September and is now open to all - but you still have to enter your...</summary>
    <author>
      <name>Richard MacManus</name>
      <uri>http://www.readwriteweb.com</uri>
    </author>
    
    <category term="Web Office" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.readwriteweb.com/">
      <![CDATA[<p><img border="0" src="http://static.flickr.com/93/277747578_c167fe564a_m.jpg"
alt="freenigma" align="left" hspace="5" vspace="5" width="240" height="96" /><a
href="http://www.freenigma.com/">freenigma</a> is a Firefox plug-in that offers e-mail
encryption to a whole range of Web email systems - including Gmail, Yahoo!Mail and
Hotmail/MSN. It is a product of Germany-based freiheit.com. freenigma came out of public
beta at the end of September and is now open to all - but you still have to enter your
name and email address to receive "an invitation" (which sounds quite 'beta' to me).
Interestingly, freenigma has also just announced a Professional Edition for corporate
customers as well as a Microsoft Outlook plug-in - both to be released by the end of the
year. So looks like they're expanding beyond just web email and into the enterprise
space.</p>

<p>It is a compelling product, as privacy and security are among the two biggest concerns
related to using the Web as a platform. Although I am an avid user of Gmail, I wonder
sometimes about sending private information across the ether on a web-based email
service. I'm sure they're the usual slightly paranoid concerns of every single Web user,
but a product like freenigma is positioned well to take advantage of those common
concerns for privacy. See also <a
href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/war_on_web_20_terror.php">my recent post</a>
on Web 2.0 security issues, from a report by Finjan.</p>]]>
      <![CDATA[<p>The freenigma homepage makes no bones about playing on the privacy fears of Web
users:</p>

<blockquote>
<p>"Today, all your e-mails are stored and sent around the planet in plain text. And
today you have no control over what happens to your private or business e-mail
conversations and you can't prevent others from reading them. Get your privacy back!
Encrypt your private and business e-mails to protect your freedom, privacy and your
business secrets."</p>
</blockquote>

<h2>How it works</h2>

<p>freenigma was built using Ajax and developers are invited to use an open programming
interface (Open API) to extend freenigma and integrate it into their own applications. It
is browser-based (Firefox), so it runs on all the main OS platforms - GNU/Linux, Apple
Macintosh or Microsoft Windows XP. It is also based on "one of the most famous and most
widely used cryptographic software packages in the world: the GNU Privacy Guard (GnuPG)."
Werner Koch, developer of GnuPG, is a founding member of freenigma along with Stefan
Richter.</p>

<p>freenigma works by encrypting e-mails before they are saved and sent; they are then
decrypted on the other end by the recipient. As noted in <a
href="http://www.freenigma.com/frequentlyaskedquestions/index.html">the FAQ</a>, even
if web-based email providers offer their own encryption services, freenigma is a
service that works across all the web email systems.</p>

<p><img border="0" src="http://static.flickr.com/83/277747572_da4d798570.jpg?v=0" /></p>

<p>As for their business plan, it is a free service "for private individuals". The fact
they're releasing an Outlook and corporate version soon suggests that the enterprise
market is where they'll make their money. Indeed this is confirmed in the FAQ:</p>

<blockquote>
<p>"We believe that many companies will outsource their e-mail in the near future. To do
so, they will utilise the services of Google Mail, Hotmail or Yahoo! Mail. However, we
believe that this change will only take place if companies are able to encrypt their
business secrets independently of the provider. That&rsquo;s where freenigma comes in.
:-)"</p>
</blockquote>

<p>Interesting service and I am curious to see how much take-up they get from businesses
for the paid service. There have been enough security lapses recently <a
href="http://blogs.zdnet.com/web2explorer/?p=285">by Google in particular</a> to make a
service like freenigma very viable. What do you think?</p>]]>
    </content>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2006://1.5103-comment:39958</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2006://1.5103" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/freenigma_email_privacy.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/freenigma_email_privacy.php#c39958" />
    <title>Comment from Emre Sokullu on 2006-10-24</title>
    <author>
        <name>Emre Sokullu</name>
        <uri>http://emresokullu.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://emresokullu.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>Yes, this is a must for enterprise use of Gmail hosted service but Google-Yahoo can always offer their own PGP encryption/signature services, I think they just don't see a need for this in the market. So this may not be a viable product.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2006-10-24T20:53:36Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2006://1.5103-comment:39959</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2006://1.5103" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/freenigma_email_privacy.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/freenigma_email_privacy.php#c39959" />
    <title>Comment from Stefan on 2006-10-28</title>
    <author>
        <name>Stefan</name>
        <uri>http://www.freenigma.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.freenigma.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>Yes, Google-Yahoo could offer a service like this themselves, but...</p>

<p>To make it secure, the content must be separated from the encryption. Or in other words: If Google-Yahoo encrypts your mail, they can also decrypt it. So this operation must be provided by an independent company/system!!!! </p>

<p>freenigma has no access to your data. And Google-Yahoo has no access to the encryption keys. In this way you can be sure, that Google-Yahoo can not decrypt your data on request. And freenigma provides interoperability over several webmail-systems and not only Google-Yahoo...</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2006-10-28T19:54:13Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2006://1.5103-comment:39960</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2006://1.5103" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/freenigma_email_privacy.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/freenigma_email_privacy.php#c39960" />
    <title>Comment from raj on 2006-10-29</title>
    <author>
        <name>raj</name>
        <uri>http://www.countwordula.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.countwordula.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>Sounds like a great application. But I have a hard time believing large corporations would outsource email. They need an IT department for other purposes, so I can't see them splintering off only email. Though they may buy the Professional edition of freenigma.</p>

<p>SMBs/ SMEs, on the other hand, might outsource their email.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2006-10-29T21:45:03Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2006://1.5103-comment:39961</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2006://1.5103" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/freenigma_email_privacy.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/freenigma_email_privacy.php#c39961" />
    <title>Comment from Graeme Thickins on 2006-10-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>Graeme Thickins</name>
        <uri>http://graemethickins.typepad.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://graemethickins.typepad.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>To get a picture of outsourcing related to email, you could look at email archiving -- required by scads of regulations today, which collectively affect most companies.  (No, archiving is not the same as backup, which is for system restore for disaster protection; this is about fast retrieval. Any company that's ever had to produce emails for legal discovery can tell you all about it.)  </p>

<p>There are hundreds of firms now offering email archiving as an outsourced service.  However, when you look at how expensive the service can be (even though there's little or no up-front investment), not to speak of the loss of control, one does wonder just how many companies will really want to go with an outsourced service for anything to do with email.  It's a lot to fork out annually.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2006-10-30T13:22:35Z</published>
  </entry>

</feed>