<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" 
      xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/google_re-org_rumors.php" />
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/atom.xml" />
  <id>tag:,2009:/1/tag:72.47.210.69,2006://1.5111-</id>
  <updated>2009-11-23T19:51:57Z</updated>
  <title>Comments for Google Re-Org Rumors: Google Maturing As Media Business</title>
  
  <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 4.23-en</generator>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2006://1.5111</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/google_re-org_rumors.php" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=5111" title="Google Re-Org Rumors: Google Maturing As Media Business" />
    <published>2006-10-27T00:03:28Z</published>
    <updated>2007-12-16T23:16:27Z</updated>
    <title>Google Re-Org Rumors: Google Maturing As Media Business</title>
    <summary><![CDATA[There's an interesting rumor doing the rounds about Google doing a re-org of their advertising business. Jeff Molander wrote: "Three of my most credible resources, including DM News&rsquo;s Giselle Abramovich, are indicating plans for a significant re-organization at Google (Nasdaq: GOOG). [...] On the re-org, says Ms. Abramovich, &ldquo;What this means is that there would...]]></summary>
    <author>
      <name>Richard MacManus</name>
      <uri>http://www.readwriteweb.com</uri>
    </author>
    
    <category term="Google" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.readwriteweb.com/">
      <![CDATA[<p>There's an interesting rumor doing the rounds about Google doing a re-org of their
advertising business. <a
href="http://www.thoughtshapers.com/index.php/weblog/archive/google-to-re-org-ibm-style-goog-reorganize-leak/">
Jeff Molander wrote</a>:</p>

<blockquote>
<p>"Three of my most credible resources, including <a
href="http://blog.dmnews.com/2006/10/24/rumor-has-it/">DM News&rsquo;s Giselle
Abramovich</a>, are indicating plans for a significant re-organization at Google (Nasdaq:
GOOG). [...] On the re-org, says Ms. Abramovich,</p>

<p>&ldquo;What this means is that there would be one global account director per account,
that pulls in resources to sell as needed - PPC (pay-per-click), Print, Radio, Video,
Display, etc.&rdquo;</p>

<p>As of yet nobody can confirm with anyone at Google but the leaks are emanating from
Google itself according to all three of my sources."</p>
</blockquote>

<p>The significance of this is that it's similar to what Microsoft and IBM already do -
extract maximum revenue for each customer (in this case, the larger advertisers on
Google). This means Google will utilize different types of ads (CPC, CPM, CPA, etc) over
all media channels - search, mobile, video, audio, etc.</p>]]>
      <![CDATA[<p>The benefit for Google's customers is that it enables them to target certain leads
across different types of media. They can do that from one 'console' and they will work
with 1 Google salesperson/account manager on their account. Of course will the large
advertising agencies be happy with this scenario of Google providing a one-stop shop? Of
course not...</p>

<p>I asked Jeff Molander for his views and he told me:</p>

<blockquote><p>"When a media company (which is what Google is at this point, albeit a
tech-enabled one) has an increasing number of products -- in this case
across multiple media like radio, Web video and text ads -- you need to
bring them together for clients.</p>

<p>After all, this is the same approach that large, multi-service agencies are
forced to adopt.  Media convergence has been the promised holy grail
(witness AOL/Time Warner) but has seemingly fallen flat when it comes to
actually reducing overall media costs for advertisers.  Can Google change
all of that?"</p>
</blockquote>

<h2>Acquisitions on the cards to increase their inventory</h2>
<p>One interesting sub-plot here is that Google needs more "inventory" to sell the
different flavors of advertising. Jeff mentions adsense for podcasting in his post - and
that is certain to be one way Google will increase their inventory. Also this puts the
likes of Feedburner, Meebo, edgeio and Commission Junction squarely in Google's sights as
<b>potential acquisitions</b>. All of those 'web 2.0' startups have no shortage of
inventory!</p>

<p>In terms of Google's overall goals, as summarised <a
href="http://blog.outer-court.com/archive/2006-10-26-n80.html">at Google Blogoscoped</a>,
this rumored re-org falls under the "push their ad system" category. It really makes
sense for Google and shows not only that they are innovating in technology - but maturing
and expanding as a media/advertising entity.</p>
<p>See also <a href="http://trailfire.com/readwriteweb/marks/22327">my trail</a> about this, which I will grow as more info comes to hand.</p>]]>
    </content>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2006://1.5111-comment:40047</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2006://1.5111" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/google_re-org_rumors.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/google_re-org_rumors.php#c40047" />
    <title>Comment from David Mackey on 2006-10-26</title>
    <author>
        <name>David Mackey</name>
        <uri>http://www.gamesecretary.com/blog.aspx</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.gamesecretary.com/blog.aspx">
        <![CDATA[<p>Commission Junction isn't a new startup - nor web 2.0 - they've been around forever and a day. Acquisitions by Google are pretty cool b/c they usually mean free ad-supported content. Maybe they will acquire some good video media.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2006-10-27T02:01:02Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2006://1.5111-comment:40048</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2006://1.5111" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/google_re-org_rumors.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/google_re-org_rumors.php#c40048" />
    <title>Comment from Emre Sokullu on 2006-10-27</title>
    <author>
        <name>Emre Sokullu</name>
        <uri>http://emresokullu.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://emresokullu.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>Exciting...</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2006-10-27T09:56:27Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2006://1.5111-comment:40049</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2006://1.5111" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/google_re-org_rumors.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/google_re-org_rumors.php#c40049" />
    <title>Comment from oi on 2006-10-27</title>
    <author>
        <name>oi</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>These "sources" of yours - how reliable are they?</p>

<p>My company provides services to customers that set up an ad campaign for them and manage there google account for them (needless to say we take a slice)...</p>

<p>Would this still be possible under the new regime?</p>

<p>What do you mean by inventory?</p>

<p>Does youtube count - the number of clips that google is having to take off the site is alarming, 1000 sports clips and the entire comedy labs (and that is just today)!</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2006-10-28T01:17:56Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2006://1.5111-comment:40050</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2006://1.5111" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/google_re-org_rumors.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/google_re-org_rumors.php#c40050" />
    <title>Comment from Richard MacManus on 2006-10-27</title>
    <author>
        <name>Richard MacManus</name>
        <uri>http://www.readwriteweb.com/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.readwriteweb.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>I've heard more info that suggests this re-org rumor is on the mark. I'm not sure how it would affect your business oi, but basically it'll mean a Google account manager will be in charge of multiple types of media advertising for 1 client. So YouTube advertising will be one of the variables (or types of inventory, as I put it in the post).</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2006-10-28T04:10:24Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2006://1.5111-comment:40051</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2006://1.5111" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/google_re-org_rumors.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/google_re-org_rumors.php#c40051" />
    <title>Comment from Rick on 2006-10-28</title>
    <author>
        <name>Rick</name>
        <uri>http://martini-lounge.blogspot.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://martini-lounge.blogspot.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>This is great!  Just like how the AOL powerhouse merged with Time Warner and became a media giant!</p>

<p>Oh wait...</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2006-10-29T01:48:07Z</published>
  </entry>

</feed>