<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" 
      xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/movable_type_enterprise.php" />
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/atom.xml" />
  <id>tag:,2008:/1/tag:72.47.210.69,2006://1.5089-</id>
  <updated>2008-07-07T14:35:32Z</updated>
  <title>Comments for Movable Type Enterprise 1.5 Launched</title>
  
  <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 4.1</generator>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2006://1.5089</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/movable_type_enterprise.php" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=5089" title="Movable Type Enterprise 1.5 Launched" />
    <published>2006-10-16T11:21:21Z</published>
    <updated>2007-12-16T23:16:25Z</updated>
    <title>Movable Type Enterprise 1.5 Launched</title>
    <summary>Today Six Apart will release a new version of its Movable Type Enterprise edition. I spoke to Anil Dash (a SixApart VP) and Chris Alden (EVP and GM of Movable Type - formally CEO of Rojo) about the upgrade and to discuss the future of Movable Type. Some of the more &apos;experienced&apos; bloggers will remember...</summary>
    <author>
      <name>Richard MacManus</name>
      <uri>http://www.readwriteweb.com</uri>
    </author>
    
    <category term="Publishing Services" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.readwriteweb.com/">
      <![CDATA[<p><img border="0" src="http://static.flickr.com/89/271195505_2d14452d8a_m.jpg"
alt="mt enterprise" align="left" hspace="5" vspace="5" width="215" height="51" />Today
Six Apart will release a new version of its <a href="http://www.movabletype.org/">Movable
Type</a> <a href="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/capabilities/enterprise">Enterprise
edition</a>. I spoke to Anil Dash (a SixApart VP) and Chris Alden (EVP and GM of Movable
Type - formally CEO of Rojo) about the upgrade and to discuss the future of Movable
Type.</p>

<p>Some of the more 'experienced' bloggers will remember the time when Movable Type was
released <a
href="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/news/2006/10/five_years_of_m.html">5 years
ago</a>. At that time it was the bee's knees and all the geeks loved it. Then Six Apart
started to get commercial, which annoyed some prominent bloggers. Then the open source
Wordpress came along and (let's be frank) stole a good chunk of the developer community
away from MT. Well, that's the short version of the story. It probably helps explain
though <i>why</i> Movable Type is now being marketed more as a business blogging tool,
even though a lot of individual bloggers (like me) use MT also.</p>

<h2>Market for enterprise blogging increasing</h2>

<p>Movable Type is currently being positioned as "the most advanced business blogging
platform". Chris told me that the majority (75-80%) of Fortune 500 companies that blog
use MT, as well as a lot of small businesses and power bloggers. He told me that over the
past couple of years a lot of businesses have begun to develop strategies around blogging
- i.e. moving up a level from project to strategy. So he said Movable Type Enterprise 1.5
is a response to increased demand by businesses for scalable blogging systems, ability to
integrate with existing systems, and easier admin.</p>

<p><img border="0"
src="http://static.flickr.com/90/271183499_426756286d.jpg?v=0" /><br />
<i>MT Enterprise: Groups</i></p>]]>
      <![CDATA[<p>I asked if MT Enterprise is competing against giant CMS systems like Vignette, or is it
being marketed in a different way? Anil said it's more complementary and can integrate
with CMS's. Whereas a CMS handles the high-end things like workflow, MT should be used
for the things blogging is good at - easy, lightweight publishing.</p>

<h2>Movable Type: the Nikon D80 of blogging platforms</h2>

<p>I noted to Chris and Anil that the <i>brand</i> of Movable Type appears to be
changing. It seems like Movable Type (the system) is being positioned as more of a
business blogging platform these days. Chris replied that MT is "good for advanced
blogging needs, it doesn't necessarily mean for businesses." He cited the usage of MT by
power bloggers.</p>

<p>Anil likened MT to the <a href="http://www.kenrockwell.com/nikon/d80.htm">Nikon
D80</a> camera, which is a pro level tool. He said most people who use that are probably
not professional photographers, but they aspire to that level of quality, expressiveness,
etc. So he said MT is "a professional level tool, whether you're a fortune 500 company
that has 10,000 bloggers on the intranet using MT Enterprise, or somebody like you or me
- we're serious individual or small publishers, our blog is a big part of our
professional lives and MT is the right tool for the job."</p>

<h2>MT Enterprise 1.5 Features</h2>

<p>So what does Movable Type Enterprise offer? Here are the main points:</p>

<ul>
<li>Allows easy administration of thousands of users, from account provisioning to role
and group management.</li>

<li>LDAP authentication</li>

<li>Support for multiple databases including Oracle DB and SQL Server</li>

<li>Enterprise-level technical support.</li>

<li>Allows distributed teams, workgroups, or multinational divisions to securely share,
archive and discover important information.</li>

<li>Surfaces only the most relevant information through customizable feeds, blog
aggregation and categorization features.</li>

<li>Saves time and resources by adopting a lightweight solution that fits into your
native environment, and is easy to install and configure.</li>

<li>Adopt a dynamic and flexible solution that can grow with your needs. A plug-in
architecture makes it easy to extend functionality.</li>
</ul>

<p>These are all things that businesses need and Chris said that MT is the only blogging
platform that supports so many of these enterprise requirements.</p>

<p><img border="0"
src="http://static.flickr.com/95/271183575_fc9b86cbd3.jpg?v=0" /><br />
<i>MT Enterprise: Roles</i></p>

<h2>Who is using MT Enterprise</h2>

<p>Here are some examples of businesses using MT Enterprise right now:</p>

<ul>
<li><a href="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/news/2006/03/guided_by_histo.html">Wells
Fargo community blog</a> (<b>Update:</b> actually a Movable Type blog, not yet Movable Type Enterprise)</li>

<li><a
href="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/news/2006/02/blogging_at_uni.html">University
of British Columbia</a></li>

<li><a
href="http://www.sixapart.com/pronet/weblog/2006/10/adobes_contribu.html">Adobe</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.nbc.com/Community/">NBC show blogs</a></li>

<li><a href="http://dl.tv/">Ziff Davis video blogs</a></li>

<li><a href="http://blogs.intel.com/it/">IT@Intel blogs</a></li>
</ul>

<h2>Summary</h2>

<p>Movable Type is a great tool and I use it to publish Read/WriteWeb. I have to say
though that the available plugins and general community support is not as strong as it
once was for MT. The reality is that the open source Wordpress is the most popular
blogging platform among 'power users' nowadays.</p>

<p>However for business blogging, MT looks to have the edge. The feature set is
impressive and it is being used by many companies. I think it's a smart move for SixApart
to focus MT on the enterprise market, as it's potentially highly profitable and has a lot
more room for growth yet - as evidenced by all the <a
href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/jotspot_hybrid_wiki_office.php">Web Office
talk</a> happening.</p>]]>
    </content>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2006://1.5089-comment:39741</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2006://1.5089" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/movable_type_enterprise.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/movable_type_enterprise.php#c39741" />
    <title>Comment from Ed Terpening on 2006-10-16</title>
    <author>
        <name>Ed Terpening</name>
        <uri>http://blog.edterpening.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blog.edterpening.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>FYI, as far as I know, we're not using MT Enterprise yet, still using the previous version.</p>

<p>-Ed Terpening, Wells Fargo Bloggoing Manager.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2006-10-16T15:50:58Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2006://1.5089-comment:39742</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2006://1.5089" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/movable_type_enterprise.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/movable_type_enterprise.php#c39742" />
    <title>Comment from Anil on 2006-10-16</title>
    <author>
        <name>Anil</name>
        <uri>http://www.anildash.com/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.anildash.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Ed, thanks for the clarification, and sorry for the ambiguity. Richard, the Wells Fargo example is definitely a Movable Type blog, not yet Movable Type Enterprise, and sorry if we were unclear in discussing that.</p>

<p>More importantly, the Wells Fargo blog is a great example of how a well-established, conservative brand can really do an excellent job of embracing the blogosphere. I think Ed's presence here really attests to that! :)</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2006-10-16T16:48:20Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2006://1.5089-comment:39743</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2006://1.5089" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/movable_type_enterprise.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/movable_type_enterprise.php#c39743" />
    <title>Comment from Vassil Mladjov on 2006-10-16</title>
    <author>
        <name>Vassil Mladjov</name>
        <uri>http://www.blogtronix.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.blogtronix.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>Well, it looks ok, but I need to show you our Blogtronix platform for secure enterprise bloggin with wiki, documents and corporate social networking. We designed it from the group up for Enterprise use :) </p>

<p>Best,<br />
Vassil Mladjov</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2006-10-16T18:22:30Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2006://1.5089-comment:39744</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2006://1.5089" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/movable_type_enterprise.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/movable_type_enterprise.php#c39744" />
    <title>Comment from B. on 2006-10-16</title>
    <author>
        <name>B.</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><em>stole a good chunk of the developer community away from MT</em></p>

<p>Really? All those developers writing OO perl plugins for MT, switched to hacking PHP plugins for WordPress? I've heard this story before. But where is the evidence?</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2006-10-16T18:26:27Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2006://1.5089-comment:39745</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2006://1.5089" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/movable_type_enterprise.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/movable_type_enterprise.php#c39745" />
    <title>Comment from Richard MacManus on 2006-10-16</title>
    <author>
        <name>Richard MacManus</name>
        <uri>http://readwriteweb.com/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://readwriteweb.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Thanks Ed, Anil -- updated that line.</p>

<p>Vassil, please email me details of your product.</p>

<p>B., you have a point there. I was thinking more of folks like Mark Pilgrim, Phil Ringnalda, et al. Developers who used MT and then very vocally moved to Wordpress.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2006-10-16T19:51:15Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2006://1.5089-comment:39746</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2006://1.5089" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/movable_type_enterprise.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/movable_type_enterprise.php#c39746" />
    <title>Comment from Geof Harries on 2006-10-16</title>
    <author>
        <name>Geof Harries</name>
        <uri>http://urbanyukon.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://urbanyukon.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>I side with B - where is the proof of this mass exodus?</p>

<p>Product maturity (stability, consistency, customer support, etc.) is much more important than community buzz. Simply because Wordpress is the current darling of the blog software industry doesn't make it a better product.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2006-10-16T19:53:07Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2006://1.5089-comment:39747</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2006://1.5089" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/movable_type_enterprise.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/movable_type_enterprise.php#c39747" />
    <title>Comment from Richard MacManus on 2006-10-16</title>
    <author>
        <name>Richard MacManus</name>
        <uri>http://readwriteweb.com/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://readwriteweb.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>I agree Geof, but I didn't say Wordpress was a *better* product - simply that it "is the most popular blogging platform among 'power users' nowadays."</p>

<p>And the "mass exodus" (as you put it) happened a good couple of years ago.</p>

<p>Look, I use MT -- so I think it's a great product. But as a user I have noticed that the developer network around it isn't as strong as it once was.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2006-10-16T19:57:38Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2006://1.5089-comment:39748</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2006://1.5089" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/movable_type_enterprise.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/movable_type_enterprise.php#c39748" />
    <title>Comment from Emre Sokullu on 2006-10-16</title>
    <author>
        <name>Emre Sokullu</name>
        <uri>http://emresokullu.com/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://emresokullu.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Wordpress based <a href="http://lyceum.ibiblio.org/" rel="nofollow">Lyceum</a> may be a good free alternative to MT Ent for small sized companies. I never used MovableType yet however its scalability, database independence and LDAP features sound unbeatable.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2006-10-16T20:11:41Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2006://1.5089-comment:39749</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2006://1.5089" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/movable_type_enterprise.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/movable_type_enterprise.php#c39749" />
    <title>Comment from Geof Harries on 2006-10-16</title>
    <author>
        <name>Geof Harries</name>
        <uri>http://urbanyukon.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://urbanyukon.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>Richard - Truly sorry about the confusion. By no means was I talking about you or this blog which runs on MT. I'm simply questioning all of the unjustified negative press/buzz that has surrounded MT as of late.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2006-10-16T20:58:53Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2006://1.5089-comment:39750</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2006://1.5089" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/movable_type_enterprise.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/movable_type_enterprise.php#c39750" />
    <title>Comment from jwilde on 2006-10-16</title>
    <author>
        <name>jwilde</name>
        <uri>http://www.advancinginsights.com/mybiz/services-and-tools</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.advancinginsights.com/mybiz/services-and-tools">
        <![CDATA[<p>FWIW This is a heads up for your readers that might be looking for an alternative solution. We've been successfully implementing an open source system, drupal, on the enterprise level for the last three and a half years. You can read all about it here, <a href="http://www.drupal.org" rel="nofollow"><a href="http://www.drupal.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.drupal.org</a></a> and decide. </p>

<p>jwilde</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2006-10-16T21:02:10Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2006://1.5089-comment:39751</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2006://1.5089" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/movable_type_enterprise.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/movable_type_enterprise.php#c39751" />
    <title>Comment from Andrew on 2006-10-16</title>
    <author>
        <name>Andrew</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>There might be some more "ambiguity" in Anil's statements. All of the blogs on NBC seem to be using something else (Pivot?) for their comments, probably because MT has terrible spam protections and their comments don't scale.</p>

<p>I think the real story here is why Moveable Type has had four or five different product managers in the past year and continues to bleed users to other platforms. This move reeks of desperation. They start <a href="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/news/2006/08/movable-type-free.html" rel="nofollow">giving away the platform</a> and no one notices, yet when WordPress which probably had less than 5% of the market 2 years ago, posts about a minor release it gets hundreds of trackbacks. Most MT blogs I see are on old versions anyway.</p>

<p>"Product maturity (stability, consistency, customer support, etc.) is much more important than community buzz. Simply because Wordpress is the current darling of the blog software industry doesn't make it a better product."</p>

<p>As a MT user, <strong>I've felt like an unwanted child for about a year now</strong>. Bugs fester for months, the Pronet list has become half a dozen of the remaining MT consultants begging to get their bugs fixed so they don't look stupid in front of thier clients. (Many even say the only reason they're still on MT is because they love Perl.) Everyone is having trouble with scaling, and the solutions keep getting more exotic. I feel like the brightest minds at Six Apart stopped focusing on MT a long time ago, and honestly I'm not sure if it will be around in a year or two.</p>

<p>I don't even like WordPress, but it's what I put friends on now. Businesses I set up MT for are now asking me if I can switch them to something else, often at the request of their hosting provider.</p>

<p>I'm very glad to see a new marketing push around MT, even if it's for a version I'll probably never use. But until they fix the core issues with the product, which I don't even know if they can do and keep it in Perl, they're basically just a glorified marketing funnel for WordPress. They'll whet the appetite for blogs and do the enterprise schmoozing to get them started, and when it starts breaking under the load they will do something funky (like use something else for their comments, like NBC) or move to a platform without as many issues, most likely from Microsoft or Automatic. (Possibly Drupal, if it gets its act together.)</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2006-10-16T21:32:56Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2006://1.5089-comment:39752</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2006://1.5089" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/movable_type_enterprise.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/movable_type_enterprise.php#c39752" />
    <title>Comment from Geof Harries on 2006-10-16</title>
    <author>
        <name>Geof Harries</name>
        <uri>http://urbanyukon.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://urbanyukon.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>I see where you're coming from, Andrew. It's an opinion I've heard voiced elsewhere with long-time MT users.</p>

<p>The product development and communications approach that Six Apart has implemented over the past year has resulted in a lot of angry/disenchanted people - perhaps it's on purpose but if it's not, the approach has completely backfired.</p>

<p>I say, on purpose, because this happens in advertising/creative agencies all of the time. The "deadbeat" clients get pruned. Why should Six Apart be allowed to do the same?</p>

<p>Six Apart is in a position to re-focus MT in the marketplace, and in fact, this is what they seem to be doing. It's not pretty, that's for certain.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2006-10-16T22:51:58Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2006://1.5089-comment:39753</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2006://1.5089" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/movable_type_enterprise.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/movable_type_enterprise.php#c39753" />
    <title>Comment from Geof Harries on 2006-10-16</title>
    <author>
        <name>Geof Harries</name>
        <uri>http://urbanyukon.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://urbanyukon.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>Oops - a typo. </p>

<blockquote>Why should Six Apart be allowed to do the same?</blockquote>

<p>should be...</p>

<blockquote>Why shouldn't Six Apart be allowed to do the same?</blockquote>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2006-10-16T22:53:46Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2006://1.5089-comment:39754</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2006://1.5089" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/movable_type_enterprise.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/movable_type_enterprise.php#c39754" />
    <title>Comment from Michael on 2006-10-16</title>
    <author>
        <name>Michael</name>
        <uri>http://blogs.princeton.edu</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blogs.princeton.edu">
        <![CDATA[<p>New Feature list<br />
<a href="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/versions-and-features.html" rel="nofollow"><a href="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/versions-and-features.html" rel="nofollow"><a href="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/versions-and-features.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/versions-and-features.html</a></a></a></p>

<p>Blog cloning is a long-awaited feature. Almost as long-awaited as LDAP (our key reason for moving up to Enterprise). The last 4 semesters, I have wasted dozens of hours manually "cloning" blogs that we had set up and customized for each student in a particular class. Thank you, Six Apart.</p>

<p>One key gripe that we had with MT versus MTE was that there was not much value-added, considering MTE's greater price. I'll have to play with the new version tomorrow, but MTE 1.5 may erase that gripe.</p>

<p>Our other gripe was that we had to hack MTE 1.0x to allow both LDAP and MT-authenticated users on the same system (some of our users are not in our LDAP directory--primarily auditors and members of one of our work-abroad programs). We would be ecstatic if we could toss our crude hack with 1.5.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2006-10-16T23:43:38Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2006://1.5089-comment:39755</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2006://1.5089" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/movable_type_enterprise.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/movable_type_enterprise.php#c39755" />
    <title>Comment from Jitendra on 2006-10-16</title>
    <author>
        <name>Jitendra</name>
        <uri>http://karmaweb.wordpress.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://karmaweb.wordpress.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>I am not sure I understand what Six Apart is trying to do here? I buy that enterprise blogging is a big deal and that the blogs are going more and more mainstream (http://karmaweb.wordpress.com/2006/09/29/identity-in-the-blogosphere/) but the driving force behind the blogosphere is really that blogs are more personal and are not typically encumbered with extensive enterprise controls. Enabling enterprise level controls for blogging is gonna make them sound like enterprise press releases which is just not going to be popular...</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2006-10-17T00:21:11Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2006://1.5089-comment:39756</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2006://1.5089" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/movable_type_enterprise.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/movable_type_enterprise.php#c39756" />
    <title>Comment from Anil on 2006-10-16</title>
    <author>
        <name>Anil</name>
        <uri>http://www.anildash.com/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.anildash.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Andrew's got a lot of passion, which I'm glad to see.. I'd love to have a link to an email or website I could respond to, but feel free to get in touch via email or phone me at 646-541-5843 any time if you want to explain more about what you'd like to see.</p>

<p>To address a few of the points raised, NBC does still use Pivot for comments on a few blogs, as that was one of the platforms they've moved from. I don't doubt that not every one of their dozens of blogs has completed the migration, but I don't think your conclusions are valid. There are many, many sites scaling to far more comments than NBC's blogs have, with spam protection that they're quite satisfied with. I would readily concede that the process of setting things up properly is too difficult, and that might explain why you're frustrated here.</p>

<p>"I think the real story here is why Moveable Type has had four or five different product managers in the past year and continues to bleed users to other platforms."</p>

<p>That's false. Making false, unsubstantiated accusations just makes your legitimate points look silly and hurts your credibility overall. This is software, not religion.</p>

<p>"Everyone is having trouble with scaling, and the solutions keep getting more exotic."</p>

<p>I agree 100% that many of the conversations from our most engaged ProNet members are about scaling -- today we released the most scalable version of Movable Type ever. We've also worked with the community to continue to improve scalability in the future. Again, I can see how you would put a negative spin on this, but some would argue that we listened to our most valuable partners in addressing one of their primary concerns.</p>

<p>There's a larger point here, though. Scaling is an issue you face once you're <em>succeeding</em>. Having a thriving, growing, active community isn't an accident with Movable Type, it's what the tool was designed to encourage. You may wonder how other tools which don't scale nearly as well don't have such passionate discussions about scaling -- maybe it's because they don't support publishers that have communities the size of NBC's, or the Washington Post's?</p>

<p>"Businesses I set up MT for are now asking me if I can switch them to something else, often at the request of their hosting provider."</p>

<p>We'd love to find out how these installations are set up, so we can address whatever performance issues you're facing. Again, I don't argue that we haven't done a good enough job of documenting or automating best practices for scalability, but every popular platform that runs on thousands of different configurations has settings that need to be optimized.</p>

<p>The fact that you're suggesting, for example, that media companies with dozens of blogs move to platforms that don't even support multiple blogs (or only do so with beta-level hacks that involve reinstalling the application over and over) indicates to me that you're not being entirely dispassionate and unemotional about this issue. Fortunately for us, the audience for Movable Type Enterprise makes their decisions on a straightfoward, rational basis.</p>

<p>But here's the straight story: I'm a personal blogger who uses Movable Type. I'm aware of all the options out there, and know what each platform is capable of. I think MT is the best tool for me, and (perhaps because I have privileged access to their plans) I think MT is going to be an ever better tool for me in the future. We do care about all of our users, but we don't expend a lot of effort on maintaining our "coolness" factor. I'm not saying that to denigrate its relative importance, but just as a statement of fact. What I'm hearing echoes conversations we've had internally -- there's an intangible feeling that is also important to individuals like you, and you want us to pay as much attention to that as to core issues like scalability, manageability, integration, etc.</p>

<p>Got it. I think other enterprise software vendors should be so lucky to have a community that's this passionate. :) Take that, Lotus Notes!</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2006-10-17T00:41:58Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2006://1.5089-comment:39757</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2006://1.5089" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/movable_type_enterprise.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/movable_type_enterprise.php#c39757" />
    <title>Comment from Brian on 2006-10-16</title>
    <author>
        <name>Brian</name>
        <uri>http://www.kalivo.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.kalivo.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>Nice post and good discussion thread. I am curious to know if anyone has any data on the enterprise blogging tools/systems market size and growth rate?</p>

<p>How much money is being spent by companies on blogging tools/systems, such as MT Enterprise and others. What is the size of the market today, and what are the projections for the next 3 to 5 years. </p>

<p>This information would probably be the greatest testimony as to whether companies are finding value in blogging and validate whether an enterprise blogging strategy is viable.</p>

<p>Any information would be greatly appreciated.</p>

<p>Thanks.</p>

<p>Richard - we at Kalivo are taking a novel approach to enabling companies to pursue a holistic customer engagement process on the web, which includes blogging. Would love to review our Hub and Listener offerings with you at some point. You can see one running our own website at www.kalivo.com. Feel free to contact me directly.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2006-10-17T03:24:57Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2006://1.5089-comment:39758</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2006://1.5089" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/movable_type_enterprise.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/movable_type_enterprise.php#c39758" />
    <title>Comment from Raj on 2006-10-17</title>
    <author>
        <name>Raj</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><br />
"Saves time and resources by adopting a lightweight solution that fits into your native environment, and is easy to install and configure."</p>

<p>"Adopt a dynamic and flexible solution that can grow with your needs. A plug-in architecture makes it easy to extend functionality."</p>

<p>These aren't features.  It's release note padding.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2006-10-18T02:04:40Z</published>
  </entry>

</feed>