<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" 
      xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/war_on_web_20_terror.php" />
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/atom.xml" />
  <id>tag:,2008:/1/tag:72.47.210.69,2006://1.5085-</id>
  <updated>2008-08-22T19:04:31Z</updated>
  <title>Comments for War on Web 2.0 Terror</title>
  
  <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 4.1</generator>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2006://1.5085</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/war_on_web_20_terror.php" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=5085" title="War on Web 2.0 Terror" />
    <published>2006-10-13T12:34:48Z</published>
    <updated>2007-12-16T23:16:25Z</updated>
    <title>War on Web 2.0 Terror</title>
    <summary><![CDATA[Web security firm Finjan has just released a report outlining &quot;sophisticated new threats that target Web 2.0 platforms and technologies.&quot; According to the report, this web security threat &quot;centers on the use of Web 2.0 and AJAX (Asynchronous JavaScript and XML) technologies for malicious activities.&quot; Finjan acknowledges that Web 2.0 and AJAX technologies enable a...]]></summary>
    <author>
      <name>Richard MacManus</name>
      <uri>http://www.readwriteweb.com</uri>
    </author>
    
    <category term="Web Security" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.readwriteweb.com/">
      <![CDATA[<p><img border="0" src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/finjan.gif" alt="finjan" align="left" hspace="5" vspace="5" width="245" height="98">Web
security firm <a href="http://www.finjan.com/">Finjan</a> has just <a href="http://www.finjan.com/Pressrelease.aspx?id=1124&amp;PressLan=293&amp;lan=3">released
a report</a> outlining &quot;sophisticated new threats that target Web 2.0
platforms and technologies.&quot; According to the report, this web security
threat &quot;centers on the use of Web 2.0 and AJAX (Asynchronous JavaScript and
XML) technologies for malicious activities.&quot; </p>
<p>Finjan acknowledges that Web 2.0 and AJAX technologies enable a rich user
experience for Internet users, but they warn: &quot;the technology also flings
open the door to new malware propagation methods.&quot; How so? Because hackers
are targeting high-traffic web sites and either embedding malicious code in
hosted Web content, or using AJAX to query what Finjan calls &quot;the hidden
web&quot;.</p>
<p>Also the report shows that content of websites distributing malicious code is
being duplicated on storage and caching servers used by ISPs, Enterprises and
leading search engines. This means that malicious code is available and can be
referenced by third party web pages to exploit an end user's machine - even if the
original malicious website has been taken down.</p>
<p>I've asked Finjan to send me the full report, but I thought in the meantime it's worth throwing the question open: have you ever experienced a web security breach on a web 2.0 or ajax service? Particularly on a "high traffic site" - which I take to mean a MySpace or a YouTube. What hacking stories do you know of in the web 2.0 space?</p>]]>
      
    </content>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2006://1.5085-comment:39689</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2006://1.5085" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/war_on_web_20_terror.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/war_on_web_20_terror.php#c39689" />
    <title>Comment from /pd on 2006-10-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>/pd</name>
        <uri>http://peterdawson.typepad.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://peterdawson.typepad.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>wont you say that the recent fake blog  posting on an offical google blog - was a web2.0 hack ?</p>

<p>"A bug in Blogger enabled an unauthorized user to make a fake post on the Google Blog claiming that we have discontinued our AdWords click-to-call test. "  </p>

<p>Not sure if Skype falls under a web2.0 folio. But SIP is certainly under attack with the reveresed eng stuff. Check the Superintendent Trojan here for more details</p>

<p><a href="http://www.heise-security.co.uk/news/79212" rel="nofollow"><a href="http://www.heise-security.co.uk/news/79212" rel="nofollow">http://www.heise-security.co.uk/news/79212</a></a></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2006-10-13T13:31:45Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2006://1.5085-comment:39690</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2006://1.5085" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/war_on_web_20_terror.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/war_on_web_20_terror.php#c39690" />
    <title>Comment from Pete on 2006-10-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>Pete</name>
        <uri>http://www.menace.co.nz</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.menace.co.nz">
        <![CDATA[<p>There was also that user created DOS 'attack' at MySpace last year (think it was some javascript that added everyone on the site as his friend?).</p>

<p>I also noticed a couple of SNS that can access your gmail, yahoo mail and hotmail contacts when you go to invite your friends, while not hacking per say, a spammer could use this to harvest email address.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2006-10-13T22:56:54Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2006://1.5085-comment:39691</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2006://1.5085" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/war_on_web_20_terror.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/war_on_web_20_terror.php#c39691" />
    <title>Comment from the rub on 2006-10-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>the rub</name>
        <uri>http://www.ishtarnation.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.ishtarnation.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>Fill us in if you end up getting that report!</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2006-10-14T00:59:49Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2006://1.5085-comment:39692</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2006://1.5085" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/war_on_web_20_terror.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/war_on_web_20_terror.php#c39692" />
    <title>Comment from Dominic Jaar on 2006-10-15</title>
    <author>
        <name>Dominic Jaar</name>
        <uri>http://dominicjaar.blogspot.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://dominicjaar.blogspot.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>A hardcore user of all 2.0 technologies, I've never had or heard about any security issues. I would be most interested to know about them: I'm giving a presentation on the topic in February...</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2006-10-15T23:56:18Z</published>
  </entry>

</feed>