<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" 
      xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/amapedia_wikipedia_for_products.php" />
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/atom.xml" />
  <id>tag:,2008:/1/tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3451-</id>
  <updated>2008-07-02T20:27:12Z</updated>
  <title>Comments for Amazon Quietly Launches Amapedia, a Wikipedia For Products</title>
  
  <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 4.1</generator>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3451</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/amapedia_wikipedia_for_products.php" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=3451" title="Amazon Quietly Launches Amapedia, a Wikipedia For Products" />
    <published>2007-01-26T02:01:57Z</published>
    <updated>2007-12-16T23:10:58Z</updated>
    <title>Amazon Quietly Launches Amapedia, a Wikipedia For Products</title>
    <summary><![CDATA[Amazon has just released a new Wikipedia clone, called Amapedia. It's described as &quot;a community for sharing information about the products you like the most.&quot; So far Amapedia has had no promotion from Amazon, but it was discovered today by Rogers Cadenhead. Anyone with an Amazon.Com account can edit the site. Regarding the name, Amapedia...]]></summary>
    <author>
      <name>Richard MacManus</name>
      <uri>http://www.readwriteweb.com</uri>
    </author>
    
    <category term="News" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.readwriteweb.com/">
      <![CDATA[<p><img border="0" src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/amapedia.jpg" align="left" hspace="5" vspace="5" width="197" height="64">Amazon
has just released a new Wikipedia clone, called <a href="http://amapedia.amazon.com/">Amapedia</a>.
It's described as &quot;a community for sharing information about the products
you like the most.&quot; So far Amapedia has had no promotion from Amazon, but
it was discovered today <a href="http://www.cadenhead.org/workbench/news/3112/amapedia-conspicuous-consumption">by
Rogers Cadenhead</a>. Anyone with an Amazon.Com account can edit the site. Regarding the name, Amapedia appears to be a combo of the words Amazon and Wikipedia:
ama[zon][wiki]pedia.</p>
<p>Note that this is a different wiki product than what Alex Iskold was
referring to <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/amazon_tags_ajax_plogs_wikis.php">in
yesterday's post</a>, on Amazon's use of tags, ajax, blogs and wikis. In that
post we were discussing the ProductWiki feature, but it states on Amapedia's
homepage that &quot;Amapedia is the next generation of Amazon.com‚Äôs
ProductWiki feature; all of your previous ProductWiki contributions were
preserved and now live here.&quot;</p>]]>
      <![CDATA[<p>The site looks pretty raw currently and has little info in it - it is after
all brand new. But a wikipedia for products makes perfect sense for Amazon. Who
better to spotlight products and gather product information from the
community, than Amazon? Another way to look at this: Amapedia could
become the next generation of user reviews. User reviews on websites today are relatively rigid
and old fashioned, so Amazon may be thinking that Amapedia will be a new
platform for user reviews - it may help remove redundancy in reviews, while
offering more completeness.</p>
<p>We'd like to see a bit more structure in the Amapedia pages, so that it is
less chaotic when people edit it. For example add sections to pages. But the
fact that tags are there already is fantastic - Amazon is calling this
&quot;collaborative structured tagging&quot;. Check it out and let us know what
you think.</p>
<p><img border="0" src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/amapedia_screenshot.jpg" width="520" height="303"></p>]]>
    </content>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3451-comment:28466</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3451" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/amapedia_wikipedia_for_products.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/amapedia_wikipedia_for_products.php#c28466" />
    <title>Comment from PohEe.com on 2007-01-25</title>
    <author>
        <name>PohEe.com</name>
        <uri>http://PohEe.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://PohEe.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>The page is not really user-friendly. Hard to find the products.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-01-26T04:05:54Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3451-comment:28467</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3451" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/amapedia_wikipedia_for_products.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/amapedia_wikipedia_for_products.php#c28467" />
    <title>Comment from Erik Kalviainen on 2007-01-25</title>
    <author>
        <name>Erik Kalviainen</name>
        <uri>http://www.productwiki.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.productwiki.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>You've made some interesting points. I'm especially interested in seeing the response since I'm a co-founder of www.productwiki.com (not affiliated with Amazon, although they use our name).</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-01-26T04:22:08Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3451-comment:28468</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3451" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/amapedia_wikipedia_for_products.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/amapedia_wikipedia_for_products.php#c28468" />
    <title>Comment from TanNg on 2007-01-25</title>
    <author>
        <name>TanNg</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Since when "pedia" belong to "Wikipedia"? Before the word encyclopedia exists?</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-01-26T07:39:18Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3451-comment:28469</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3451" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/amapedia_wikipedia_for_products.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/amapedia_wikipedia_for_products.php#c28469" />
    <title>Comment from Adrian keys on 2007-01-26</title>
    <author>
        <name>Adrian keys</name>
        <uri>http://www.jollyjo.org</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.jollyjo.org">
        <![CDATA[<p>The name is awfull but would not doubt it catching on...Amazon is just too big......</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-01-26T14:58:43Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3451-comment:28470</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3451" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/amapedia_wikipedia_for_products.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/amapedia_wikipedia_for_products.php#c28470" />
    <title>Comment from Barberman on 2007-01-26</title>
    <author>
        <name>Barberman</name>
        <uri>http://barberman.net</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://barberman.net">
        <![CDATA[<p>Information and sharing...<br />
Isn't that what the Internet is designed for?<br />
I love it!</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-01-26T18:43:36Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3451-comment:28471</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3451" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/amapedia_wikipedia_for_products.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/amapedia_wikipedia_for_products.php#c28471" />
    <title>Comment from Maureen Flynn-Burhoe on 2007-01-27</title>
    <author>
        <name>Maureen Flynn-Burhoe</name>
        <uri>http://oceanflynn.wordpress.com/2007/01/28/amapedia-for-amazon-insiders/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://oceanflynn.wordpress.com/2007/01/28/amapedia-for-amazon-insiders/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Thanks again for introducing me to another layer of the blogosphere. Since it came to my attention through your blog I felt confident to sign up for Amapedia. Much to my disappointment I was unable to submit a review on Antonio Damasio's (2003) <em>Looking for Spinoza</em> because Amapedia registration only permits users who have purchased something. For now I have this review in both my new <a href="http://docs.google.com/Doc?id=ddp3qxmz_43hmbk3p" rel="nofollow">Google Docs and Spreadsheet,</a> in my <a href="http://oceanflynn.wordpress.com/2007/01/28/amapedia-for-amazon-insiders/" rel="nofollow">Speechless WordPress Blog </a> and my <a href="http://oceanflynn.vox.com/library/post/review-damasio-antonio-2003-looking-for-spinoza-joy-sorrow-and-the-feeling-brain.html" rel="nofollow">oceanflynn.vox.com</a>but I tend to use Amazon a lot for reviews as a reader and had hoped to contribute as a writer. This is the first of Web 2.0 type services that makes some purchase requirement as prerequisite for membership. I hope it is not a trend. So far in my experiment on building blogs in Web 2.0, which I began exploring in September 2006, Wordpress and Flickr have provided by far the best free service in terms of content/connectivity.  </p>

<p>Thanks for your amazing site which has become a lighthouse for me out here in the blogosphere. I appreciate that your articles are consistently concise, clear and well-referenced. </p>

<p>Maureen Flynn-Burhoe</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-01-27T22:16:24Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3451-comment:28472</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3451" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/amapedia_wikipedia_for_products.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/amapedia_wikipedia_for_products.php#c28472" />
    <title>Comment from Billy on 2007-01-27</title>
    <author>
        <name>Billy</name>
        <uri>http://adbritewiki.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://adbritewiki.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>I'm wondering how this ads value over and above the current Amazon reviews and new wiki option on Amazon. Seems like a redundant offering and simply another place to go for the same content. That doesn't appeal to me.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-01-28T05:01:28Z</published>
  </entry>

</feed>