<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" 
      xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/google_promotes_checkout.php" />
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/atom.xml" />
  <id>tag:,2008:/1/tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.5281-</id>
  <updated>2008-09-24T12:21:43Z</updated>
  <title>Comments for Google Promotes Checkout on Homepage</title>
  
  <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 4.1</generator>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.5281</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/google_promotes_checkout.php" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=5281" title="Google Promotes Checkout on Homepage" />
    <published>2007-01-17T06:27:19Z</published>
    <updated>2007-12-16T23:16:45Z</updated>
    <title>Google Promotes Checkout on Homepage</title>
    <summary><![CDATA[Spotted tonight by John Milan, Google has a promotion for its online shopping product Google Checkout on its homepage - probably the most traffiked web page in the world. Also there's some interesting speculation over on the Cost Per News site that Google Checkout is set to ramp up: &quot;I‚Äôve heard rumblings from my sources...]]></summary>
    <author>
      <name>Richard MacManus</name>
      <uri>http://www.readwriteweb.com</uri>
    </author>
    
    <category term="Google" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.readwriteweb.com/">
      <![CDATA[<p>Spotted tonight by John Milan, Google has a promotion for its online shopping product <a href="https://checkout.google.com/">Google Checkout</a> on its homepage - probably the most traffiked web page in the world.</p>
<p><img border="0" src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/GoogleCheckout.PNG" width="513" height="354"></p>
<p>Also there's some interesting speculation over on <a href="http://www.costpernews.com/2007/01/17/google-puts-checkout-on-main-page/">the
Cost Per News site</a> that Google Checkout is set to ramp up:</p>
<blockquote>
  <p>&quot;I‚Äôve heard rumblings from my sources within the company and from a
  few of the merchants involved in the Checkout program that something major is
  on the way‚Ä¶ soon.&quot;</p>
</blockquote>
<p>See also <a href="http://blogs.zdnet.com/micro-markets/?p=798">Donna Bogatin</a>
and <a href="http://searchengineland.com/070116-142503.php">SearchEngineLand</a>,
both of whom cite some worries over Google's management of Checkout. On the
latter link, Danny Sullivan says that &quot;Google's not thinking clearly about
the best way to balance promoting its own products and the trust of users.&quot;</p>
<p>More on this story as it develops, as I'm sure it will...</p>]]>
      
    </content>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.5281-comment:42182</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.5281" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/google_promotes_checkout.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/google_promotes_checkout.php#c42182" />
    <title>Comment from Emre Sokullu on 2007-01-16</title>
    <author>
        <name>Emre Sokullu</name>
        <uri>http://emresokullu.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://emresokullu.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>This is not the same type of disruptive offering that brought Google success.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-01-17T06:38:49Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.5281-comment:42183</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.5281" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/google_promotes_checkout.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/google_promotes_checkout.php#c42183" />
    <title>Comment from Richard Hearne on 2007-01-16</title>
    <author>
        <name>Richard Hearne</name>
        <uri>http://www.redcardinal.ie</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.redcardinal.ie">
        <![CDATA[<p>No, this is Google starting to really leverage the position they have built to date. I suppose not strange for a dominant market player to utilise it's resources for its own good. How does this fit with 'do no evil'?</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-01-17T07:09:16Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.5281-comment:42184</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.5281" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/google_promotes_checkout.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/google_promotes_checkout.php#c42184" />
    <title>Comment from Richard MacManus on 2007-01-16</title>
    <author>
        <name>Richard MacManus</name>
        <uri>http://www.readwriteweb.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.readwriteweb.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>I wouldn't describe this as 'evil', in fact it's probably sound business sense to leverage the Google homepage to promote their products. I suppose though there are *some* parallels between this and Microsoft putting IE in the start page of Windows - in the sense that Google is using a dominant platform to push its own product over smaller, less fortunate e-commerce services.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-01-17T07:16:46Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.5281-comment:42185</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.5281" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/google_promotes_checkout.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/google_promotes_checkout.php#c42185" />
    <title>Comment from John Milan on 2007-01-16</title>
    <author>
        <name>John Milan</name>
        <uri>http://intelligantt.blogspot.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://intelligantt.blogspot.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>Heck, I was curious enough to click on it and check it out :)</p>

<p>My question is, with Google stock at $504 per share, couldn't they do better than $10? Make it $50 and I'm trying it.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-01-17T07:22:21Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.5281-comment:42186</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.5281" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/google_promotes_checkout.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/google_promotes_checkout.php#c42186" />
    <title>Comment from Emre Sokullu on 2007-01-16</title>
    <author>
        <name>Emre Sokullu</name>
        <uri>http://emresokullu.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://emresokullu.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>No John, it would look even worse. Reminds me the first Batman movie starred by Michael Keaton. Joker (Jack Nicholson) was spreading money from air to the people of Gotham City! Same here..</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-01-17T07:29:36Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.5281-comment:42187</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.5281" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/google_promotes_checkout.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/google_promotes_checkout.php#c42187" />
    <title>Comment from Jess on 2007-01-17</title>
    <author>
        <name>Jess</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Google homepage placements are a sure shot way to boost traffic to a service.  It has worked extremely well in the past.  For stats/graph of the effect, take a look at:</p>

<p><a href="http://blog.compete.com/2007/01/07/technorati-google-blog-search-compete/?int=1032" rel="nofollow"><a href="http://blog.compete.com/2007/01/07/technorati-google-blog-search-compete/?int=1032" rel="nofollow">http://blog.compete.com/2007/01/07/technorati-google-blog-search-compete/?int=1032</a></a></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-01-17T13:52:13Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.5281-comment:42188</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.5281" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/google_promotes_checkout.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/google_promotes_checkout.php#c42188" />
    <title>Comment from Sam Bedford on 2007-01-17</title>
    <author>
        <name>Sam Bedford</name>
        <uri>http://wis.dm/sam</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://wis.dm/sam">
        <![CDATA[<p>It certainly makes sense now that probably they have a degree of critical mass.  I used it myself recently and didn't have a good experience.  Needless to say I won't be using it any time soon.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-01-17T14:37:22Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.5281-comment:42189</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.5281" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/google_promotes_checkout.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/google_promotes_checkout.php#c42189" />
    <title>Comment from Allen Stern on 2007-01-17</title>
    <author>
        <name>Allen Stern</name>
        <uri>http://www.centernetworks.com/looks-like-google-has-brought-the-tips-back</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.centernetworks.com/looks-like-google-has-brought-the-tips-back">
        <![CDATA[<p>#7 Sam - do they? Because from a $10 off $10 offer that is running that either means:<br />
a. they haven't gotten past the tech set<br />
or<br />
b. they want to crush the hell out of paypal.</p>

<p>I posted about this (click my name) this morning and now it appears there are ads for gmail within gmail chat applet.</p>

<p>Also technically remember that GC is a wholly owned sub of Google.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-01-17T16:18:08Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.5281-comment:42190</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.5281" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/google_promotes_checkout.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/google_promotes_checkout.php#c42190" />
    <title>Comment from Martial Arts Dave on 2007-01-17</title>
    <author>
        <name>Martial Arts Dave</name>
        <uri>http://www.underground-training.com/self_defense/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.underground-training.com/self_defense/">
        <![CDATA[<p>I think they have a real big hill to climb with paypal being who they are. people arn't going to buy just cause a site has a google checkout...</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-01-17T21:41:49Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.5281-comment:42191</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.5281" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/google_promotes_checkout.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/google_promotes_checkout.php#c42191" />
    <title>Comment from PohEe.com on 2007-01-17</title>
    <author>
        <name>PohEe.com</name>
        <uri>http://pohee.com/blog/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://pohee.com/blog/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Anybody can share their experience on using google CheckOut? is it comparable with PayPal? How popular is that in Worldwide?</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-01-17T23:34:45Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.5281-comment:42192</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.5281" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/google_promotes_checkout.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/google_promotes_checkout.php#c42192" />
    <title>Comment from brokenscenester on 2007-01-19</title>
    <author>
        <name>brokenscenester</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>This is, as it should be, a fu*king smart business move.  Google has put themselves in the catbird seat, and - akin to Apple - has won over the consumer with elegance/relevance and clean, simple design. The interesting question (to me) is this: as Google increases the "noise" (commercial bias, product creep,...) will there be a point of deflation in the eyes of the consumer where the soul leaves the body.  </p>

<p>The public company thirst for growth and the engineering intensity on new products have to create an enormous pressure to push things up into their core interface.  </p>

<p>I think the consumer goes to Google to be sent somewhere else, with an expectation of relevance and quality.  Sure they can (and arguably should) put their own stuff "alongside", but when they take over the space and leave out other consumer desired options, the cracks start to form, imho.  </p>

<p>This is a leading example.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-01-19T15:56:14Z</published>
  </entry>

</feed>