<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" 
      xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/google_reader_readwrite.php" />
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/atom.xml" />
  <id>tag:,2009:/1/tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.5271-</id>
  <updated>2009-11-23T19:52:13Z</updated>
  <title>Comments for Google Reader May Evolve Into Read/Write App</title>
  
  <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 4.23-en</generator>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.5271</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/google_reader_readwrite.php" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=5271" title="Google Reader May Evolve Into Read/Write App" />
    <published>2007-01-14T22:53:06Z</published>
    <updated>2007-12-16T23:16:44Z</updated>
    <title>Google Reader May Evolve Into Read/Write App</title>
    <summary>James Corbett has an interesting post speculating that Google Reader might become a &apos;read/write&apos; app over the course of 2007. Says James: &quot;The addition of support for tagging and link blogging were the warning shots but the coming months will see Reader evolve into a fully fledged Reader/Writer (let&apos;s call it ReWriter). Google ReWriter is...</summary>
    <author>
      <name>Richard MacManus</name>
      <uri>http://www.readwriteweb.com</uri>
    </author>
    
    <category term="RSS Aggregators" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.readwriteweb.com/">
      <![CDATA[<p><img border="0" src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/google_reader_jan07.jpg"
align="right" hspace="5" vspace="5" width="141" height="37" />James Corbett has <a
href="http://eirepreneur.blogs.com/eirepreneur/2007/01/google_rewriter.html#comment-27725206">
an interesting post</a> speculating that Google Reader might become a 'read/write' app
over the course of 2007. Says James:</p>

<blockquote>
<p>"The addition of support for tagging and <a
href="http://scobleizer.com/2007/01/03/25000-items-read-on-google-reader/">link
blogging</a> were the warning shots but the coming months will see Reader evolve into a
fully fledged Reader/Writer (let's call it ReWriter). Google ReWriter is the first
product that will tie the major pieces of the Read/Write web together - RSS/ATOM (feeds),
OPML, Social-Bookmarking/Tagging (folksonomies), Attention and Microformats."</p>
</blockquote>

<p>I agree that <a href="http://www.google.com/reader/">Google Reader</a> has been adding
some fantastic functionality over recent months. Indeed I now use Google Reader as my
main RSS Reader - just last week I loaded it up with a bunch more OPML files and RSS
feeds. Also by reading the <a href="http://googlereader.blogspot.com/">official Google
Reader blog</a>, you can tell the engineers are passionate about building up and adding
new things to the product - something sadly missing in other top online RSS Readers, some
of which have stayed largely the same for 2+ years now.</p>

<p>It remains to be seen whether Google Reader will add more 'writer' features over 2007
- Google has to be careful the product doesn't become too geeky and experimental. You can
quickly scare off people with talk of OPML and microformats (guilty!). But I think Google
Reader is the most interesting online RSS Reader around right now, so if they can
integrate the 'writer' functionalities into the product in a way that they're very easy
to use... the RSS reading market could come alive again.</p>]]>
      
    </content>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.5271-comment:42064</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.5271" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/google_reader_readwrite.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/google_reader_readwrite.php#c42064" />
    <title>Comment from Carsten on 2007-01-14</title>
    <author>
        <name>Carsten</name>
        <uri>http://www.notsorelevant.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.notsorelevant.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>Indeed, a very interesting observation by James Corbett. At first I only liked the link blog possibilities in Google Reader but since about a week I am using it more and more. It seems it will replace Bloglines someday.</p>

<p>Although Google Reader allows tagging I don't think it will become a full-fledged social bookmarking tool or an annotation service like Clipmarks. On the other hand Google could bury its Notebook product and then...</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-01-14T23:46:00Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.5271-comment:42065</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.5271" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/google_reader_readwrite.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/google_reader_readwrite.php#c42065" />
    <title>Comment from brian.leroux on 2007-01-14</title>
    <author>
        <name>brian.leroux</name>
        <uri>http://westcoastlogic.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://westcoastlogic.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>I far prefer NewsHutch to Google Reader. It has a 'flow' like quality thats hard to describe; give it a try.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-01-15T01:07:15Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.5271-comment:42066</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.5271" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/google_reader_readwrite.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/google_reader_readwrite.php#c42066" />
    <title>Comment from maninmen on 2007-01-14</title>
    <author>
        <name>maninmen</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>There are other interesting readers out there, such as Spokeo.   It syndicates multimedia content from social networks.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-01-15T05:40:53Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.5271-comment:42067</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.5271" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/google_reader_readwrite.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/google_reader_readwrite.php#c42067" />
    <title>Comment from JP on 2007-01-15</title>
    <author>
        <name>JP</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Now if they would just let me *search* my feeds it would be the best reader out there....</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-01-15T20:01:24Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.5271-comment:42068</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.5271" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/google_reader_readwrite.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/google_reader_readwrite.php#c42068" />
    <title>Comment from ImJasonH on 2007-01-16</title>
    <author>
        <name>ImJasonH</name>
        <uri>http://www.imjasonh.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.imjasonh.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>Interesting article.  I agree that as link blogs become more popular, they may attract readers away from actual blogs.</p>

<p>I wrote a post a few weeks ago about how the Google Reader look and feel could be extended to every Google service, essentially allowing people to star and share anything, not just RSS items - <a href="http://www.imjasonh.com/2006/12/seeing-stars-and-shares.html" rel="nofollow"><a href="http://www.imjasonh.com/2006/12/seeing-stars-and-shares.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.imjasonh.com/2006/12/seeing-stars-and-shares.html</a></a></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-01-16T13:42:46Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.5271-comment:42069</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.5271" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/google_reader_readwrite.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/google_reader_readwrite.php#c42069" />
    <title>Comment from Paulo Diniz on 2007-01-16</title>
    <author>
        <name>Paulo Diniz</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Very interesting post and insight from James. I elaborated a bit more about this idea on my blog, hope you like it:</p>

<p><a href="http://notariussystem.blogspot.com/2007/01/missing-piece-of-blogosphere.html" rel="nofollow"><a href="http://notariussystem.blogspot.com/2007/01/missing-piece-of-blogosphere.html" rel="nofollow">http://notariussystem.blogspot.com/2007/01/missing-piece-of-blogosphere.html</a></a></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-01-17T05:03:50Z</published>
  </entry>

</feed>