<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" 
      xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/mozilla_upgrades_firefox_addons.php" />
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/atom.xml" />
  <id>tag:,2008:/1/tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3507-</id>
  <updated>2008-08-22T19:01:53Z</updated>
  <title>Comments for Mozilla Upgrades Firefox Add-ons Site; Interview with Mike Shaver, Mozilla Add-ons Guru</title>
  
  <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 4.1</generator>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3507</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/mozilla_upgrades_firefox_addons.php" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=3507" title="Mozilla Upgrades Firefox Add-ons Site; Interview with Mike Shaver, Mozilla Add-ons Guru" />
    <published>2007-02-12T23:44:11Z</published>
    <updated>2007-12-16T23:11:02Z</updated>
    <title>Mozilla Upgrades Firefox Add-ons Site; Interview with Mike Shaver, Mozilla Add-ons Guru</title>
    <summary>Later today Mozilla is launching an upgrade to its Add-Ons website. Add-ons are extensions to the Firefox browser and Mozilla is aiming to make them more accessible to mainstream users with this upgrade. Last week I spoke with Mike Shaver, Mozilla&apos;s Director of Ecosystem Development and &quot;add-ons guru&quot;, about the new add-ons upgrade and also...</summary>
    <author>
      <name>Richard MacManus</name>
      <uri>http://www.readwriteweb.com</uri>
    </author>
    
    <category term="Browsers" />
    
    <category term="News" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.readwriteweb.com/">
      <![CDATA[<p><img border="0" src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/firefox_addons_feb07a.jpg"
alt="firefox addons" align="left" hspace="5" vspace="5" width="250" height="48" />Later
today Mozilla is launching an upgrade to its <a
href="https://addons.mozilla.org/firefox/">Add-Ons</a> website. Add-ons are extensions to the Firefox
browser and Mozilla is aiming to make them more accessible to mainstream users with this
upgrade. Last week I spoke with Mike Shaver, Mozilla's Director of Ecosystem Development and "add-ons
guru", about the new add-ons upgrade and also Mozilla's plans for the future in regards
to add-ons.</p>

<h2>Add-ons Site Upgrade</h2>

<p>Mike told me there are 3 main focuses for the upgrade:</p>

<p>1) <b>Localization</b> - they have <s>8</s> 7 localized communities at launch, with a couple
more on the way. The current languages supported are: Chinese, German, French, Japanese, Korean, Slovak, Spanish, <s>Turkish</s>. <i>Update: Turkish now won't be supported in the initial release.</i></p>

<p>2) <b>Improved search and categorization</b> - also Ajax previews for add-ons.</p>

<p>3) Perhaps most significant, Mozilla is <b>enhancing the community aspects of the
site</b> - enabling users to review and "self-select" add-ons. Essentially this effects
how new adds-ons join the site. Previously selection decisions were made by a small
approval community, but the new site features a "sandbox" so that general users can
select, review and rate add-ons. The more popular an add-on is with the community, the
more coverage it gets on the site. The flip-side to this is that less add-ons will get
onto the site, because only the most popular ones will make it. A full list of add-ons
will still be available, but on Mozilla's developer community page. Note that this
"self-select" process also enables the site to scale better (add-ons are
showing a lot of growth currently).</p>

<p>Another benefit of the increased community participation is that it increases the testing process for add-ons - providing code review, feature testing, usability feedback for add-on developers.</p>]]>
      <![CDATA[<p>Also Mozilla has removed a bunch of old add-ons (a.k.a. extensions), due to trimming down
of add-ons that are now redundant (e.g. subsumed within Fx), not being used or no longer
being maintained. All add-ons that are not compatible with Fx 1.5 or later have been
removed from the site.</p>

<p><img border="0" src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/addons_preview_feb07b.jpg"
width="520" height="283" /></p>

<h2>The Future of Add-ons</h2>

<p>Mike said that add-ons are becoming more popular with non-technical users and that
this is a key area of focus for Firefox add-ons. Firefox has 80 Million users now and so
it's important that add-ons can be easily used by all of that audience. More than 7 million Firefox users currently have add-ons installed on their browser.</p>

<p>I asked Mike whether Mozilla will be promoting add-ons more to mainstream audiences.
He mentioned some partnerships with "major brands" - an example being the <a href="http://www.mozilla.com/en-US/add-ons/kodak/">Firefox Companion for Kodak EasyShare Gallery</a>, which was released late last week. But upgrading the add-ons site is part of this process of making add-ons usable
for mainstream users. Mike said:</p>

<blockquote>
<p>"The key for us and for our partners, or for people who are working as developers on
add-ons, is figuring out what the essence of the service being provided to the user is -
and seeing where that makes sense to have it be more tightly integrated into what they're
doing on the Web. [...] I think we'll see significant energy with partnerships and
independent developers - so that they can find something on the browser they want to make
better for their users, and present their own spin on the Web that way."</p>
</blockquote>

<h2>Add-ons and Widgets</h2>

<p>I asked Mike whether add-ons for Mozilla are similar to widgets/gadgets for Microsoft
and Google? He replied that the main difference is that Firefox add-ons integrate with
the browser - "a piece of software that a user spends all of their time in" - and so
add-ons are able to "integrate into those experiences really tightly". Also Mike
mentioned that there's a lot of re-use that goes on, with open source code and
components. So Firefox plus add-ons, he said, is a powerful developer platform.</p>

<h2>Add-ons and Information Brokering</h2>

<p>I asked Mike about Firefox 3 being <a
href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/firefox_3_plans.php">an information broker</a>
- will this mean that add-ons utilize web services more over time? Mike said that the
browser's job will increasingly be to "represent the user on the Web and to bring the Web
[to them] on the user's terms", so he expects add-ons to utilize technologies such as web services and microformats; and also some add-ons will be brought into the core Firefox product. Overall he thinks that
because Firefox is an extensible product, add-ons are a key part of its ongoing
development.</p>

<p><b>Note:</b> I will update this post when Mozilla pushes the changes live. In the meantime, check out our <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/firefox_add-ons_recommended.php">Review of Firefox Recommended Add-ons</a> from October 06.</p>]]>
    </content>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3507-comment:29034</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3507" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/mozilla_upgrades_firefox_addons.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/mozilla_upgrades_firefox_addons.php#c29034" />
    <title>Comment from Walker Hamilton on 2007-02-12</title>
    <author>
        <name>Walker Hamilton</name>
        <uri>http://walkerhamilton.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://walkerhamilton.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>FYI... it was done in CakePHP</p>

<p><a href="http://www.cakephp.org" rel="nofollow"><a href="http://www.cakephp.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.cakephp.org</a></a></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-02-13T00:48:38Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3507-comment:29035</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3507" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/mozilla_upgrades_firefox_addons.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/mozilla_upgrades_firefox_addons.php#c29035" />
    <title>Comment from MySchizoBuddy on 2007-02-12</title>
    <author>
        <name>MySchizoBuddy</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Mozilla Wiki says it based on vanilla forum, atleast the discussions part<br />
<a href="http://wiki.mozilla.org/Update:Remora_Interactions/Forums" rel="nofollow"><a href="http://wiki.mozilla.org/Update:Remora_Interactions/Forums" rel="nofollow">http://wiki.mozilla.org/Update:Remora_Interactions/Forums</a></a></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-02-13T01:16:32Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3507-comment:29036</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3507" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/mozilla_upgrades_firefox_addons.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/mozilla_upgrades_firefox_addons.php#c29036" />
    <title>Comment from Walker Hamilton on 2007-02-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>Walker Hamilton</name>
        <uri>http://walkerhamilton.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://walkerhamilton.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>Yes, the <b>forum</b> is based on vanilla. But the application running the addons site, itself, is built using cakePHP.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-02-13T14:49:33Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3507-comment:29037</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3507" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/mozilla_upgrades_firefox_addons.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/mozilla_upgrades_firefox_addons.php#c29037" />
    <title>Comment from Arvind Kumar on 2007-03-02</title>
    <author>
        <name>Arvind Kumar</name>
        <uri>http://www.Womenbrands.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.Womenbrands.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>:   Womenbrands.com deals with daily issues related with women in the age group of 16 to 50 years.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-03-02T09:48:05Z</published>
  </entry>

</feed>