<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" 
      xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/web_30_4cpvs.php" />
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/atom.xml" />
  <id>tag:,2008:/1/tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3515-</id>
  <updated>2008-07-02T20:26:39Z</updated>
  <title>Comments for Web 3.0 = (4C + P + VS)</title>
  
  <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 4.1</generator>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3515</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/web_30_4cpvs.php" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=3515" title="Web 3.0 = (4C + P + VS)" />
    <published>2007-02-14T20:28:41Z</published>
    <updated>2007-12-16T23:11:04Z</updated>
    <title>Web 3.0 = (4C + P + VS)</title>
    <summary><![CDATA[Written by Sramana Mitra I have written a few pieces already addressing the disjointed nature of the web, whereby, you go one place for content, another for community, and a third for commerce, the most notable of these is the popular, 4C: Yahoo&rsquo;s Turnaround Formula. Let&rsquo;s quickly recap the terminology: 3C = Content, Commerce, Community...]]></summary>
    <author>
      <name>Sramana Mitra</name>
      
    </author>
    
    <category term="Analysis" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.readwriteweb.com/">
      <![CDATA[<p><i>Written by <a href="http://sramanamitra.com/"><b>Sramana Mitra</b></a></i></p>

<p>I have written a few pieces already addressing the disjointed nature of the web,
whereby, you go one place for content, another for community, and a third for commerce,
the most notable of these is the popular, <a href="http://sramanamitra.com/blog/484">4C:
Yahoo&rsquo;s Turnaround Formula</a>.</p>

<p>Let&rsquo;s quickly recap the terminology:</p>

<p><strong>3C = Content, Commerce, Community | 4th C = Context | P = Personalization | VS
= Vertical Search</strong></p>

<p>This, I submit, is the formula for the future: <strong>Web 3.0 = (4C + P +
VS)</strong>.</p>

<p>Web 2.0 has been a nichy phenomenon with hundred and thousands of microcap efforts
addressing one of the Cs, lately, <strong>Community</strong> being the most popular
force, producing companies like <a href="http://www.myspace.com">MySpace</a>, <a
href="http://www.facebook.com">Facebook</a>, <a href="http://www.piczo.com">Piczo</a>, <a
href="http://www.xanga.com">Xanga</a>, and <a
href="http://www.flixter.com">Flixster</a>.</p>

<p>In Web 1.0, <strong>Commerce</strong> had been the driving force, that produced
companies like <a href="http://www.netflix.com">Netflix</a>, <a
href="http://www.bluenile.com">BlueNile</a>, <a href="http://www.amazon.com">Amazon</a>,
and <a href="http://www.ebay.com">eBAY</a>. It had also resulted in the Dotcom
meltdown.</p>

<p>The same period that is seeing the surge of Web 2.0, has also seen a great deal of
investment in <strong>Vertical Search</strong>, like <a
href="http://www.sidestep.com">Sidestep</a> for Travel.</p>

<p><strong>Personalization</strong> has remained limited to some unsatisfactory efforts
by the MyYahoo team, their primary disadvantage being the lack of a starting
<strong>Context</strong>. More recently, <a href="http://www.netvibes.com">Netvibes</a>
has raised a lot of buzz, but also lacks the same organizing principle:
<strong>Context</strong>.</p>

<p>In Web 3.0, I predict, we are going to start seeing roll-ups. We will see a trunk that
emerges from the <strong>Context</strong>, be it film (Netflix), music (iTunes), cooking
/ food, working women, single parents, &hellip; and assembles the Web 3.0 formula that
addresses the whole set of needs of a consumer <strong>in that Context</strong>.</p>]]>
      <![CDATA[<h2>Imagine</h2>

<p>- I am a petite woman, dark skinned, dark haired, brown eyed. I have a distinct
personal style, and only certain designers resonate with it (Context).<br />
- I want my
personal <a href="http://www.saks.com">SAKS Fifth Avenue</a> which carries clothes by
those designers, in my size (Commerce).<br />
- I want my personal <a
href="http://www.vogue.com">Vogue</a>, which covers articles about that Style, those
Designers, and other emerging ones like them (Content).<br /> 
- I want to exchange notes with
others of my size-shape-style-psychographic and discover what else looks good. I also
want the recommendation system tell me what they&rsquo;re buying (Community).<br />
- There&rsquo;s also some basic principles of what looks good based on skin tone, body
shape, hair color, eye color &hellip; I want the search engine to be able to filter and
match based on an algorithm that builds in this knowledge base (Personalization, Vertical
Search).</p>

<p>Now, imagine the same for a short, fat man, who doesn&rsquo;t really have a sense of
what to wear. And he doesn&rsquo;t have a wife or a girl-friend. Before Web 3.0, he could
go to the personal shopper at Nordstrom.</p>

<p>With Web 3.0, the internet will be his Personal Shopper.</p>

<p><i>Sramana Mitra is an Entrepreneur, Founder CEO of 3 companies, Strategy Consultant
to 50+ companies, and Author of a popular technology business blog, <a
href="http://www.sramanamitra.com">Sramana Mitra on Strategy</a>.</i></p>]]>
    </content>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3515-comment:29209</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3515" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/web_30_4cpvs.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/web_30_4cpvs.php#c29209" />
    <title>Comment from Alex Iskold on 2007-02-14</title>
    <author>
        <name>Alex Iskold</name>
        <uri>http://www.adaptiveblue.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.adaptiveblue.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>I love the formula and the style! In my mind more than just shopping, much more, will come out of what you are saying: personalized news, personalized recommendations, personalized search. All of these are going to be part of new web. Of course shopping is important, but we do not just shop all the time :)</p>

<p>Alex</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-02-14T20:48:32Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3515-comment:29210</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3515" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/web_30_4cpvs.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/web_30_4cpvs.php#c29210" />
    <title>Comment from Robert Dewey on 2007-02-14</title>
    <author>
        <name>Robert Dewey</name>
        <uri>http://wantsy.blogspot.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://wantsy.blogspot.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>My vision is pretty close, although I imagine people will at least need to know what they want (simply stating "I'm fat and don't know what I want" won't suffice).</p>

<p>I envision the system to be driven by RSS... Users know what they want, and it's humans who make the suggestions and product offers. Web 2.0 is all about making humans into the ultimate democratic algorithm, and I think that will carry over.</p>

<p>Your formula is awesome, and like Alex said - it could be applied to many different areas. </p>

<p><br />
-Robert</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-02-14T21:44:19Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3515-comment:29211</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3515" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/web_30_4cpvs.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/web_30_4cpvs.php#c29211" />
    <title>Comment from Ali on 2007-02-14</title>
    <author>
        <name>Ali</name>
        <uri>http://www.everybodygoto.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.everybodygoto.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>That's right money can be made from many things on the internet. It isn't just limited to shopping for clothes, gadgets etc...</p>

<p>As for the formula I think you can't really generalize it with just that, as I can come up with the 4A's</p>

<p>Avenue for marketing<br />
Assimilation of Information<br />
Absorption of that Information and<br />
Abolition of negatives</p>

<p>to get to the "Z" which is the "Zeroing" in on the required  Information.</p>

<p>Hence the most important factor is the "I" the "Information"</p>

<p>So my formula -> Web 3.0 is I = (4A + Z)</p>

<p>Just thinking outloud :)</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-02-14T21:52:54Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3515-comment:29212</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3515" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/web_30_4cpvs.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/web_30_4cpvs.php#c29212" />
    <title>Comment from Jon on 2007-02-14</title>
    <author>
        <name>Jon</name>
        <uri>http://www.fashmatch.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.fashmatch.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>at www.fashmatch.com we are trying to build what is depicted in the example. We are taking small steps, but we will get there.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-02-15T02:59:02Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3515-comment:29213</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3515" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/web_30_4cpvs.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/web_30_4cpvs.php#c29213" />
    <title>Comment from PohEe.com on 2007-02-14</title>
    <author>
        <name>PohEe.com</name>
        <uri>http://PohEe.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://PohEe.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>Nice formula. What is the keyword for Web 3.0?</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-02-15T03:41:24Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3515-comment:29214</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3515" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/web_30_4cpvs.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/web_30_4cpvs.php#c29214" />
    <title>Comment from Sramana Mitra on 2007-02-14</title>
    <author>
        <name>Sramana Mitra</name>
        <uri>http://sramanamitra.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://sramanamitra.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>Thanks all for the nice comments. Jon of fashmatch, pls email me with details about your project. Cheers, Sramana</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-02-15T07:06:39Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3515-comment:29215</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3515" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/web_30_4cpvs.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/web_30_4cpvs.php#c29215" />
    <title>Comment from Fred C. on 2007-02-15</title>
    <author>
        <name>Fred C.</name>
        <uri>http://www.fredcavazza.net/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.fredcavazza.net/">
        <![CDATA[<p>My tought on Web 3.0 :</p>

<p><a href="http://www.fredcavazza.net/index.php?2006/11/19/1348-toward-a-web-30" rel="nofollow"><a href="http://www.fredcavazza.net/index.php?2006/11/19/1348-toward-a-web-30" rel="nofollow">http://www.fredcavazza.net/index.php?2006/11/19/1348-toward-a-web-30</a></a></p>

<p>/Fred</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-02-15T08:29:39Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3515-comment:29216</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3515" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/web_30_4cpvs.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/web_30_4cpvs.php#c29216" />
    <title>Comment from Miguel dos Santos on 2007-02-15</title>
    <author>
        <name>Miguel dos Santos</name>
        <uri>http://www.rafiq.za.net/blog/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.rafiq.za.net/blog/">
        <![CDATA[<p>I think you need to add an 'I' in there somewhere for Interoperability or Integrated or something like that.<br />
But maybe we shouldn't call it Web 3.0, but Web 2.0++.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-02-15T12:07:48Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3515-comment:29217</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3515" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/web_30_4cpvs.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/web_30_4cpvs.php#c29217" />
    <title>Comment from Jessi on 2007-02-16</title>
    <author>
        <name>Jessi</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>How about adding a 5th "C" for Collaboration?</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-02-16T20:08:06Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3515-comment:29218</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3515" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/web_30_4cpvs.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/web_30_4cpvs.php#c29218" />
    <title>Comment from Gautama on 2007-02-19</title>
    <author>
        <name>Gautama</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Not overwhelmed by the forumla itself or the notions of extending the blanket term Web 2.0, although the parts of the formula ‚Äì 4C, P, and VS are very interesting. You write well with good analogy and aplication to what we've seen in the past (dominance of commerce) to the current (community) and where we are going ‚Äì which is a good debate. Thanks.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-02-19T16:37:16Z</published>
  </entry>

</feed>