<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" 
      xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/alt_search_engine_market_shares.php" />
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/atom.xml" />
  <id>tag:,2008:/1/tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3594-</id>
  <updated>2008-09-24T12:19:56Z</updated>
  <title>Comments for Alt Search Engine Market Share Mashup</title>
  
  <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 4.1</generator>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3594</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/alt_search_engine_market_shares.php" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=3594" title="Alt Search Engine Market Share Mashup" />
    <published>2007-03-13T07:35:53Z</published>
    <updated>2007-12-16T23:11:12Z</updated>
    <title>Alt Search Engine Market Share Mashup</title>
    <summary><![CDATA[The mashups of our Top Alternative Search Engines list continue! Charles Knight spotted a great post by the Search The Web 2.0 blog, which took the top 100 and attempted to rank them by market share. The reason for this ambitious undertaking was a comment that Charles made when we first published the list: &quot;...people...]]></summary>
    <author>
      <name>Richard MacManus</name>
      <uri>http://www.readwriteweb.com</uri>
    </author>
    
    <category term="Analysis" />
    
    <category term="Search Services" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.readwriteweb.com/">
      <![CDATA[<p>The mashups of our Top Alternative Search Engines <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/top_100_alternative_search_engines_feb07.php">list</a> continue! <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/about_charles.php">Charles
Knight</a> spotted a great post by the <a href="http://searchtheweb2.blogspot.com/2007/02/rankings-top-100-alternative-search.html">Search The Web 2.0 blog</a>, which took the top 100 and attempted to rank them
by market share. The reason for this ambitious undertaking was a comment that
Charles made when <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/top_100_alternative_search_engines.php">we
first published the list</a>: </p>

<blockquote>
<p>&quot;...people actually use four main search engines for 99.99% of their
searches: Google, Yahoo!, MSN, and Ask.com (in that order).&quot; </p>
</blockquote>
<p>Well it turns out the figure is closer to 95.45%, and that's counting AOL too!
:-) Check out <a href="http://searchtheweb2.blogspot.com/2007/02/rankings-top-100-alternative-search.html">the
actual blog post</a> for the full table, with market share for each of the 100
alt search engines and more. But I especially liked these two summary graphs:</p>
<p><img border="0" src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/alt_search_long_tail_0207.jpg" width="400" height="203"></p>
<p>The above graph (<a href="http://bp0.blogger.com/_rtriDVT-hlY/RcZnif_jN9I/AAAAAAAAAAM/zHKygNVtS1U/s1600-h/long_tail_0207.gif">large
version here</a>) shows the long tail of search engines, which is so small
because Google, Yahoo et al are so dominant.</p>]]>
      <![CDATA[<p><img border="0" src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/alt_search_daily_searches_0207.jpg" width="400" height="203"></p>
<p>This graph (<a href="http://bp2.blogger.com/_rtriDVT-hlY/RcZnt__jN-I/AAAAAAAAAAU/yn_r7Jd5wOw/s1600-h/daily_searches_0207.gif">large
version</a>) shows the long tail &quot;under a microscope (using a semi-log
plot)&quot;. As SearchTheWeb2 explains, &quot;it clearly shows that the long
tail for the alternative search engines is again dominated by a few such as AOL,
Digg and Del.icio.us&quot;.</p>
<p>Great stuff! Keep the mashups coming - you can find the other mashups, as
well as Charles Knight's original Alt Search Engine posts, on <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/about_charles.php">his
R/WW profile page</a>.</p>]]>
    </content>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3594-comment:30119</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3594" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/alt_search_engine_market_shares.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/alt_search_engine_market_shares.php#c30119" />
    <title>Comment from Charles Knight on 2007-03-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>Charles Knight</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>I claim "literary license" for my use of the 99.99% figure.  It should be read as, "practically all" searches are done with these four search engines - rather than a bona fide statistic.  Without a doubt, if you want accurate market share numbers, this excellent article has them.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-03-13T11:49:00Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3594-comment:30120</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3594" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/alt_search_engine_market_shares.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/alt_search_engine_market_shares.php#c30120" />
    <title>Comment from Search the Web 2 on 2007-03-15</title>
    <author>
        <name>Search the Web 2</name>
        <uri>http://searchtheweb2.blogspot.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://searchtheweb2.blogspot.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>FYI,<br />
We wrote a new article two days ago, titled <a href="http://searchtheweb2.blogspot.com/2007/03/global-search-market-shares-as-of.html" rel="nofollow">"Global Search Market Share in 2007"</a></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-03-15T15:09:11Z</published>
  </entry>

</feed>