<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" 
      xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/current_mashup_api_trends.php" />
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/atom.xml" />
  <id>tag:,2008:/1/tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3633-</id>
  <updated>2008-07-02T20:25:31Z</updated>
  <title>Comments for Current Mashup and API Trends</title>
  
  <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 4.1</generator>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3633</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/current_mashup_api_trends.php" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=3633" title="Current Mashup and API Trends" />
    <published>2007-03-23T10:52:59Z</published>
    <updated>2007-12-16T23:11:16Z</updated>
    <title>Current Mashup and API Trends</title>
    <summary>Web 2.0 has brought us a flock of APIs and the wonderful new concept of a Web mashup. Thanks to apps like Google Maps, del.icio.us and Flickr, we have started to think a lot about remixing the web. In the figure below is a classic example of a mashup - a Twitter Map. This mashup...</summary>
    <author>
      <name>Alex Iskold</name>
      <uri>http://www.adaptiveblue.com</uri>
    </author>
    
    <category term="Analysis" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.readwriteweb.com/">
      <![CDATA[<p>Web 2.0 has brought us
a flock of APIs and the wonderful new concept of a Web <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mashup_%28web_application_hybrid%29">mashup</a>. Thanks to
apps like Google Maps,
del.icio.us and Flickr, we have started to think a lot about remixing the web. In the figure below
is a classic example of a mashup - a Twitter Map.
This mashup uses Twitter and Google Maps APIs to create a new application, which literally puts
Twitter
users on the map.
</p>
<p><img src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/22mar07/twitter_map.jpg" width="460" height="329" /></p>
<p>
When two services like this are put together, it is likely that something
interesting will emerge. However, not all possible combinations of services are actually
useful. To bring order to the often chaotic world of Mashups, John Musser created
a site called <a href="http://www.programmableweb.com">ProgrammableWeb</a> that tracks mashups and APIs.
John's site forms the basis of much of this post. So let's head over there to
find out what the big trends are in mashups and APIs today...
</p>
<h2>High Level API Trends: Google leads the pack</h2>
<p>The API section of ProgrammableWeb shows popular APIs. It also has an <a href="http://www.programmableweb.com/scorecard">interesting scorecard</a> that
compares API offerings from web giants like Google and Microsoft. A quick look at the score
card reveals that <b> Yahoo!</b> and <b> Google</b> lead the pack in terms of number of APIs - 22 and 20 respectively.
Amazon, Microsoft and AOL have roughly half of that and eBay has 4.&nbsp;</p>]]>
      <![CDATA[<p>
 But in terms of usage, <b> Google
is far ahead of the pack</b> - 1114 Mashups use a Google API. It is also interesting to note that
even though Microsoft has 3 times the APIs of eBay, they both have the same number of Mashups
using their APIs.
</p>
<p>Also check out the <a href="http://www.programmableweb.com/matrix">mashup matrix</a>,
which gives insights as to how APIs cluster with each other. Each
dot in the matrix implies that two APIs are part of the same mashup. One way to
interpret the matrix is that a cluster of dots indicates logical belongings of
APIs, or a natural fit with each other.&nbsp;
</p>
<h2>Analyzing Mashups: Mapping continues to dominate</h2>
<p><img src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/22mar07/mashup_stats.png" vspace="5" hspace="5" align="right" width="136" height="183">The Mashup dashboard
on ProgrammableWeb contains a lot of
interesting statistics about Mashups. On the right, we see the numbers for the past six months.
We conclude that mashups have been growing steadily, but not spectacularly. This is not
surprising, because creating mashups requires time and more importantly technical know-how.
<p> The figure below shows the distribution of tags for mashups. This is calculated by analyzing
the tags across all the mashups posted onto ProgrammableWeb. Mapping is overwhelmingly
the most popular category,
spanning 43% of all mashups. This is not surprising because it all started with
the Google Maps API - and people are still very excited about putting information on a map. Photos, Search and
Shopping tags are roughly equal - with 10% each.
</p>
<p><img src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/22mar07/mashups_popular.png" /></p>
<h2>Mashup popularity
</h2>
<p>
ProgrammableWeb currently measures popularity by number of views. This is a bit unfortunate,
particularly because there is no way to sort mashups by <i>rating</i>. As a result, the most popular
mashup - <a href="http://www.programmableweb.com/url/323">Virtual Places</a>  - is
one that does
not have a high rating. It looks interesting and claims to be sophisticated, but it did
not load for me.
The second most popular mashup was called <a href="http://www.programmableweb.com/url/5494">Wii Seeker</a>.
As the name implies, it helps people find nearby locations that have a Nintendo
Wii. It must have been really
popular at some point, but now it looks fairly primitive. The next mashup that caught my attention
was the one in fourth place called <a href="http://www.programmableweb.com/url/375">Weather Bonk</a>.
This one had a high user rating and was actually very interesting, as it pulled together
live weather, historical information, forecasts and web cameras.
</p>
<p><b>Using Delexa for mashup popularity</b></p>
Next we briefly leave ProgrammableWeb and head over to <a href="http://www.delexa.org/tagcount/mashup">Delexa</a>,
a mashup site that uses del.icio.us and Alexa APIs to show the most popular sites by category.
The top mashup tagged by del.icio.us users was <a href="http://www.housingmaps.com/">Housing Maps</a>, a
classic mashup
that combines Google Maps and Craigslist to help people find housing.
<p><img src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/22mar07/housing_maps.jpg" /></p>
<p>The second most popular mashup according to Delexa was <a href="http://www.geogreeting.com/">GeoGreeting</a>,
which is more entertaining than useful. This mashup showed geographical locations with buildings
that resembled the shape of the letter that you typed. The third most popular mashup according
to Delexa was Weather Bonk, the same one that caught my eye on ProgrammableWeb.
</p>
<h2>Analyzing APIs: GoogleMaps used in 50% of mashups</h2>
<p><img src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/22mar07/api_stats.png" vspace="5" hspace="5" align="right" width="136" height="101">Back now on ProgrammableWeb and the chart on the right demonstrates 
the growth of APIs. As with mashups, the actual growth is not that impressive - but it is steady.
As of now, there are close to 400 registered APIs. The way that Programmable Web
measures API popularity seems to be more objective and reliable than is the case
with mashups. The popularity equals the number
of mashups that use the API and the chart below shows the distribution of the most popular
APIs:
</p>
<p><img src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/22mar07/api_popular.png" /></p>
<p>There are few surprises in this information. Google Maps is by far the most popular API,
with 50% of mashups using it. Flickr and Amazon are next with 11% and 8% respectively.
Also, it's notable that 5% of mashups are using YouTube - which probably corresponds to the recent rise of
video aggregators like <a href="http://www.vidmeter.com/">Vidmeter</a>. Finally, 4% and total of 74 mashups
use the del.icio.us API.&nbsp;
</p>
<p>One API that caught my eye was <a href="http://cloudalicio.us/">Cloudalicious</a>,
which shows the distribution of tags for a particular URL over time. This can be insightful in terms of
understanding how people's perception about your site is changing (or not).
Check out the del.icio.us tag cloud trend <a href="http://cloudalicio.us/tagcloud.php?url=www.readwriteweb.com&amp;x=19&amp;y=6">for
Read/WriteWeb</a>:
</p>
<p><img border="0" src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/cloudalicious_rww_mar07.jpg" width="520" height="319">
</p>
<h2>Conclusion</h2>
<p>What can we derive from this analysis? It appears that mashups are certainly cool,
but they are <i> not</i> burgeoning. The growth has been steady, but not really explosive. This begs
the question: why?&nbsp;
</p>
<p> There are several reasons, the primary one being that most current mashups are
created for fun and not for business. Enthusiasts with some spare time on their hands are
building these during their evenings and weekends, without having monetization in mind. The second
reason is that APIs, as with any software libraries, have a learning curve. Certainly
Internet companies
are trying to expose their services in the simplest possible way, but not everything can be made simple.
</p>
<p>
Is this what mashups will be - a playground for enthusiasts? I believe that the answer is 'yes'.
Even though services like Yahoo! Pipes, Teqlo and Dapper are working to simplify the process of
creating mashups, it will likely remain a fairly technical exercise done by enthusiasts.&nbsp;
</p>
<p> However,
it is also likely that we will see companies and products taking ideas from many mashups
and creating applications with the combined functionality. For example, taking ideas from
the best
mashups (like Cloudalicious) and creating a set of tools for bloggers and marketers would be
very useful. So mashups will, I think, become the labs of the web - where rapid prototyping
is done by enthusiasts, which gives rise to more integrated offerings by web companies.
</p>
<p>Please let us know what your favorite mashup is and give us your take on where
mashups
are heading.</p>]]>
    </content>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3633-comment:30690</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3633" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/current_mashup_api_trends.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/current_mashup_api_trends.php#c30690" />
    <title>Comment from Johnny on 2007-03-23</title>
    <author>
        <name>Johnny</name>
        <uri>http://www.partygps.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.partygps.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>It will definetly be interesting to see how the mashup evolves over the next few years. I think they will get more useful as they become easier to create and use. One thing I noticed is there are many more mashups that are just throw together without much thought or design than the ones that are well thought out.</p>

<p>If you have a moment, check out this mashup using Google Maps at <a href="http://www.partygps.com." rel="nofollow"><a href="http://www.partygps.com." rel="nofollow">http://www.partygps.com.</a></a> It is certainly one created for fun and not business.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-03-23T14:50:37Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3633-comment:30691</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3633" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/current_mashup_api_trends.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/current_mashup_api_trends.php#c30691" />
    <title>Comment from Sandy on 2007-03-23</title>
    <author>
        <name>Sandy</name>
        <uri>http://www.mapmyevent.com/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.mapmyevent.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Nice article. Please visit my site for my piece of mashup work<br />
<a href="http://www.mapmyevent.com/" rel="nofollow"><a href="http://www.mapmyevent.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.mapmyevent.com/</a></a></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-03-23T15:12:42Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3633-comment:30692</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3633" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/current_mashup_api_trends.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/current_mashup_api_trends.php#c30692" />
    <title>Comment from John Koe on 2007-03-23</title>
    <author>
        <name>John Koe</name>
        <uri>http://www.exactlead.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.exactlead.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>I would like to point out that some mashup based on Googl's Adwords API are commercial enterprises.  Integration with Adwords API is a big business. this just one example <a href="http://www.keycompete.com/" rel="nofollow"><a href="http://www.keycompete.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.keycompete.com/</a></a> , <a href="http://www.spyfu.com" rel="nofollow"><a href="http://www.spyfu.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.spyfu.com</a></a> (beta), cannot think of more.</p>

<p>John Koe<br />
<a href="http://www.exactlead.com" rel="nofollow"><a href="http://www.exactlead.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.exactlead.com</a></a></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-03-23T16:15:24Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3633-comment:30693</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3633" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/current_mashup_api_trends.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/current_mashup_api_trends.php#c30693" />
    <title>Comment from Jose on 2007-03-23</title>
    <author>
        <name>Jose</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Here's another weather mashup, but more aviation oriented: <a href="http://www.mymetar.com." rel="nofollow"><a href="http://www.mymetar.com." rel="nofollow">http://www.mymetar.com.</a></a></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-03-23T18:25:29Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3633-comment:30694</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3633" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/current_mashup_api_trends.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/current_mashup_api_trends.php#c30694" />
    <title>Comment from Phill Midwinter on 2007-03-23</title>
    <author>
        <name>Phill Midwinter</name>
        <uri>http://www.surrch.eu</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.surrch.eu">
        <![CDATA[<p>I love Google Maps, it's the best thing they've done for search since they did search. However I wish they'd stop branching out and would return to improve their core search engine. There is no excuse anymore, and i felt the need to rant on my blog about it about 10 minutes ago quite wretchedly.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-03-23T19:19:05Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3633-comment:30695</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3633" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/current_mashup_api_trends.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/current_mashup_api_trends.php#c30695" />
    <title>Comment from Apatar Open Source Data Integration/ETL on 2007-03-23</title>
    <author>
        <name>Apatar Open Source Data Integration/ETL</name>
        <uri>http://www.apatar.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.apatar.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>Alex, I think there is a disconnect in between the future of cloud computing and the current state of API infrastructure offered to the developers to make use of mashups in the enterprise, there are just not enough APIs outhere to make it happen anytime soon. In five to ten years perhaps.</p>

<p>I recently posted on the issue about enterprise adopting mashup technologies here <a href="http://apatar.com/blogs/renat/2007/03/21/three-trends-influencing-enterprise-20" rel="nofollow">Three Trends Influencing Enterprise 2.0</a>.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-03-24T01:10:12Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3633-comment:30696</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3633" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/current_mashup_api_trends.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/current_mashup_api_trends.php#c30696" />
    <title>Comment from Alex Iskold on 2007-03-23</title>
    <author>
        <name>Alex Iskold</name>
        <uri>http://www.adaptiveblue.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.adaptiveblue.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>@6 Please see my previous post this week about turning websites into webservices. A lot of the APIs will be leveraged by other companies, not necessarily enterprises.</p>

<p>Alex</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-03-24T02:37:13Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3633-comment:30697</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3633" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/current_mashup_api_trends.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/current_mashup_api_trends.php#c30697" />
    <title>Comment from Will on 2007-03-23</title>
    <author>
        <name>Will</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>I think and hope the web is going to drive the development of business mashups.  I've been doing integration in large companies and it's way too difficult and proprietary.  Thanks to RSS, REST, etc it's apparent that making things simple are usually why things get adopted (as opposed to the drawn out standards that are made way too complicated).<br />
I want to see business applications providing APIs instead of always having to write custom interfaces everytime.  Most apps were written for users who log into a gui rather than from a backend web service.  For financial reports, they are still being put online as pdf or word docs instead of xml.  From what I've seen of XBRL it is WAY too complicated.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-03-24T03:13:44Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3633-comment:30698</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3633" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/current_mashup_api_trends.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/current_mashup_api_trends.php#c30698" />
    <title>Comment from Byron Binkley on 2007-03-24</title>
    <author>
        <name>Byron Binkley</name>
        <uri>http://www.protosw.com/user/profile/4</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.protosw.com/user/profile/4">
        <![CDATA[<p>Alex - nice analysis. We (at Proto) think mashups will take off when: 1) they are used for business / commercial applications, probably within the enterprise and SMBs and 2) a platform makes it easy enough for end users to 'mix and mash' to do the easy parts but still allow the technical users to 'extend and connect' to services and resources. </p>

<p>We just presented at Under the Radar (http://undertheradarblog.com/) along with Teqlo and Mashery  and it is clear that there is an ecosystem developing to support developing commercial mashup applications. From Strike Iron to Salesforce.com, there is interest in recombining data and services to build real business mashups. I think the enthusiasts showed proof of concept, and businesses are now paying attention to the opportunity (so are VCs). So for what it's worth, we think this opportunity is starting to get real legs outside the enthusiast playground.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-03-24T23:18:36Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3633-comment:30699</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3633" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/current_mashup_api_trends.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/current_mashup_api_trends.php#c30699" />
    <title>Comment from Wade Sonenberg on 2007-03-28</title>
    <author>
        <name>Wade Sonenberg</name>
        <uri>http://acreforum.com/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://acreforum.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>In real estate, the last year has really seen a big push to integrate Gmaps into all sorts of RE search functions.  As for enterprise usage, the MLS Data/IDX providers really come to mind - many of them are getting a pretty penny for adding searchable MLS maps through mapping API's, mostly Google's, although Loopnet adopted MSN's Virtual Earth.  We just put up a mashup of <a href="http://acreforum.com/traffic-counts/georgia-dot-traffic-counts.php" rel="nofollow">Georgia Traffic Count Data</a> which cuts out service providers to the tune of $300 a year.  Now that industry groups are looking at mashups like this as a competitive advantage, I believe mashups like MLS map searches will become a must-have.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-03-28T12:05:56Z</published>
  </entry>

</feed>