<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" 
      xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/morfik_ajax_platform.php" />
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/atom.xml" />
  <id>tag:,2009:/1/tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3555-</id>
  <updated>2009-11-23T19:53:10Z</updated>
  <title>Comments for Morfik&apos;s Ajax Platform Set To Challenge Google, Adobe, Microsoft</title>
  
  <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 4.23-en</generator>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3555</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/morfik_ajax_platform.php" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=3555" title="Morfik's Ajax Platform Set To Challenge Google, Adobe, Microsoft" />
    <published>2007-03-01T09:01:42Z</published>
    <updated>2007-12-16T23:11:08Z</updated>
    <title>Morfik&apos;s Ajax Platform Set To Challenge Google, Adobe, Microsoft</title>
    <summary>There&apos;s been lots of talk recently about desktop/web platforms. Last week we mentioned more News Reader desktop apps powered by Microsoft&apos;s WPF platform, and of course this week Adobe has featured twice on R/WW due to its unveiling of Apollo. We&apos;ve also profiled smaller companies in the past - e.g. Laszlo and Morfik. The latter...</summary>
    <author>
      <name>Richard MacManus</name>
      <uri>http://www.readwriteweb.com</uri>
    </author>
    
    <category term="Startups" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.readwriteweb.com/">
      <![CDATA[<p><img border="0" src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/morfik_logo_feb07.jpg"
align="left" hspace="5" vspace="5" width="177" height="49" />There's been lots of talk
recently about desktop/web platforms. Last week we mentioned more News Reader desktop
apps powered by <a
href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/three_more_microsoft_wpf_news_readers_launched.php">
Microsoft's WPF platform</a>, and of course this week Adobe has featured twice on R/WW
due to its <a
href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/adobe_engage_apollo_mainstream_users.php">unveiling
of Apollo</a>. We've also profiled smaller companies in the past - e.g. <a
href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/laszlo_to_release_webos.php">Laszlo</a> and <a
href="http://www.morfik.com">Morfik</a>. The latter company, Morfik, has mostly been
flying under the radar for the past year, but their 100% Ajax platform is getting set for
its 1.0 release at the end of March. I caught up with the team recently to see what
they've got under the hood....</p>

<p>The last time I profiled Morfik, <a
href="http://blogs.zdnet.com/web2explorer/?p=169">in April 2006</a>, I noted that their
goal is to push the edges of what can run on current browsers. They're doing this by
creating a platform on which developers can develop complex and highly functional Ajax
applications. Morfik then, is designed to take advantage of the browser rendering engine
to its fullest potential.</p>

<h2>Ajax-ifying Salesforce.com</h2>

<p>One of Morfik's more intriguing <a href="http://labs.morfik.com">lab experiments</a>
currently is the transformation of the Salesforce.com interface into a purely Ajax one.
AjaxSalesforce was described to me as a demonstration of "what a Salesforce.com
experience could truly be like, if state-of-the-art Ajax technology is used". Created
with Morfik AppsBuilder, the app aims to create a UI that mimics the functionality of a
desktop CRM system - but using 100% Ajax.</p>]]>
      <![CDATA[<p><img border="0" src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/morfik_salesforce3.jpg"
width="520" height="491" /></p>

<h2>What is Morfik exactly?</h2>

<p>In a nutshell, Morfik allows developers to use high-level programming languages (which
give the developer more power - e.g. BASIC, C#, Pascal) to create web apps. It does this
by converting apps from high level language INTO Ajax code. For example, says Morfik, all
the rich internet apps in their labs were written in a high level language, then
translated into Javascript. So essentially you can develop web apps not needing to know
Javascript, or even what Ajax is.</p>

<p>You can also create web services using Morfik. In our discussion, I noticed that
Adobe's Flex was being mentioned a lot as a point of comparison. In the case of web
services, the Morfik developers told me their platform offers "everything in one box" -
that developers can use external things, unlike with Flex.</p>

<p>Another feature of Morfik is that it can create "unplugged" web apps, meaning offline
functionality. They've built real world examples (some which can't be mentioned publicly
yet) that can run unplugged, with access to a central or local database - all via the web
browser! Yes, offline web browsing and well before <a
href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/firefox_3_offline_apps.php">Firefox 3 has
delivered similar functionality</a>.</p>

<p>One real world example I can quote is a French investment house, which is using Morfik
technology to allow their salesforce to go out into the field and collect data on their
laptops, in the browser but <i>offline</i> - then when they come back to the office,
everything is synced up automatically.</p>

<p>Another prototype is a desktop version of Gmail, which has the ability to check email
offline:</p>

<p><img border="0" src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/gmail_offline.jpg" width="520"
height="231" /></p>

<p>Morfik's platform is still in development, but their 1.0 version is due for release
sometime in March - it's currently in the last beta process. For developers reading this,
I encourage you to go test it out, because this is a leading edge web development
toolset. The pricing: an express license is free for non-commercial apps, and they also
offer a "professional license" which has no deployment or ongoing cost and can run
anywhere/everywhere in a business.</p>

<h2>Competition</h2>

<p>So how does Morfik stack up to its competition? This can get complicated for
non-developers like me, but the crux of it is that Morfik uses 100% Ajax and renders in
the native browser. Whereas all the other platforms use non-native browser plug-ins (like
Flash) or render <i>outside</i> the browser. Adobe's Apollo and Laszlo both largely
output in Flash (a browser plug-in) and Microsoft's WPF renders outside the browser.</p>

<p>So Morfik thinks there's nothing on the market comparable to their platform. Possibly
their main threat though is whatever <b>Google</b> might be cooking up. The <a
href="http://code.google.com/webtoolkit/">Google Web Toolkit</a> is a similar tool to
Morfik, in that it enables developers to create sophisticated Ajax applications using
Java. There was even <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/google_web_tool.php">a
rumor swirling around</a> in May last year that Google partnered with Morfik, or licensed
technology from it. Morfik is tight-lipped about GWT, as they are apparently still under
NDA obligations. However, they told me that "despite Google's technology claims, Google
does not use GWT for any of its on-line services".&nbsp;</p>

<p>It's unclear to me what the relationship is between Google and Morfik, but we can
speculate on the reasons why Google doesn't use GWT internally on its own apps. There
could be some legal issue constraining GWT usage, making it risky for high stake services
such as GMail or Google Maps. Or it may be that GWT is not as good as Google says it is.
Certainly Morfik is adament that their technology is far more sophisticated and complete
than GWT. I'm not qualified to comment on that, but it is true that Morfik has been
working on their platform for a long time - since 1999 - and so they may well have an
advantage over Google in this domain.</p>

<h2>Future of Ajax</h2>

<p>Now I'm no developer, so I'm expecting the programmers in R/WW's readership to jump
into the comments and give us their views (which in my experience, are usually forthright
and sans mincing of words!). Morfik itself claims its platform is the future of how you
develop Ajax apps. According to them, the Morfik platform gives you a framework for
building controls - and not just fancy visual effects. They say it allows you to create
the "best effects possible in the browser" and that there's "no limitation on what you
can do with ajax, but there hadn't been a system to take advantage of that before."</p>

<p>Let us know what you think in the comments.</p>]]>
    </content>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3555-comment:29685</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3555" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/morfik_ajax_platform.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/morfik_ajax_platform.php#c29685" />
    <title>Comment from Muneeb on 2007-03-01</title>
    <author>
        <name>Muneeb</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Sounds interesting although some more details are still to be found out. </p>

<p>The basic criticism which Google's Web Toolkit has faced is that it's the wrong flow of architecture. It does makes thing easier for a Java developer but in true technical terms it's like going to England from USA while flying around the globe (ok wait, that was a wierd example ;) ).</p>

<p>Anyways, things will only get clear once they release it.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-03-01T09:37:35Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3555-comment:29686</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3555" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/morfik_ajax_platform.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/morfik_ajax_platform.php#c29686" />
    <title>Comment from Delixe on 2007-03-01</title>
    <author>
        <name>Delixe</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>$5K for a developers license to use commercially? I'll learn AJAX myself and use my code at that rate and wait for someone to release something more...free? No thank you.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-03-01T09:37:46Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3555-comment:29687</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3555" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/morfik_ajax_platform.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/morfik_ajax_platform.php#c29687" />
    <title>Comment from Stoicho M on 2007-03-01</title>
    <author>
        <name>Stoicho M</name>
        <uri>http://morfikan.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://morfikan.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>I am using it to build a full blown rss reader with offline capabilities and syncing when go online. Soon (in a month) to release beta and website. </p>

<p>Developing with WebOS Apps Builder has been great, because it is a RAD tool, it has visual designer, and *many* others goodies no tool currently has.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-03-01T10:25:56Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3555-comment:29688</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3555" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/morfik_ajax_platform.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/morfik_ajax_platform.php#c29688" />
    <title>Comment from Steve on 2007-03-01</title>
    <author>
        <name>Steve</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>This does sound interesting. However "no limitation on what you can do with ajax, but there hadn't been a system to take advantage of that before." is just wrong. There may be no limitation on what you can do within the confines of AJAX, but suggesting you can do <em>anything</em> with AJAX is wrong.</p>

<p>AJAX has it's place - as does Flex/Flash however they are different and both have advantages / disadvantages. </p>

<p>This does sound a very good tool for building AJAX apps without learning AJAX - however is that a good thing? As programmers do we really want to rely on a tool to generate code for us - and not understand what it is doing?</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-03-01T10:35:24Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3555-comment:29689</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3555" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/morfik_ajax_platform.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/morfik_ajax_platform.php#c29689" />
    <title>Comment from Colin on 2007-03-01</title>
    <author>
        <name>Colin</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Google Web Toolkit is Open Source (version 1.3) and there are already a few dozen external contributors developing for the project...  vs ???</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-03-01T11:13:04Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3555-comment:29690</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3555" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/morfik_ajax_platform.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/morfik_ajax_platform.php#c29690" />
    <title>Comment from Hatem on 2007-03-01</title>
    <author>
        <name>Hatem</name>
        <uri>http://phpmagazine.net</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://phpmagazine.net">
        <![CDATA[<p>Just for precision, GWT is the equivalent to Scriptor in morfik and it's only supporting Java, while scriptor support Basic, Pascal and C# ... I don't think you are comparing the same thing. </p>

<p>AJAX Magazine have a full coverage of Morfik's features if you are interested</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-03-01T11:51:20Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3555-comment:29691</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3555" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/morfik_ajax_platform.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/morfik_ajax_platform.php#c29691" />
    <title>Comment from Neil Cauldwell on 2007-03-01</title>
    <author>
        <name>Neil Cauldwell</name>
        <uri>http://www.neilcauldwell.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.neilcauldwell.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>Now we have a great big blur between the desktop and the web, what do the R/WW developer community think budding developers should concentrate on; high-level programming languages, or web languages?</p>

<p>Is there a greater reach for Morfik over making use of developers who know high-level programming languages, but don't know web languages? Will we see a shift to working with high-level languages and converting to the web? Surely it would make more sense to work in the language that you intend the application to end up running in? It's like writing a book in English when you only intend to have it reach a Chinese market.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-03-01T13:00:15Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3555-comment:29692</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3555" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/morfik_ajax_platform.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/morfik_ajax_platform.php#c29692" />
    <title>Comment from Julian on 2007-03-01</title>
    <author>
        <name>Julian</name>
        <uri>http://blog.julianonsoftware.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blog.julianonsoftware.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>Hi Richard, OpenLaszlo as of Jan 2007 has pluggable renderers. For 4.0b1 this means you can render the same app using Flash OR DHTML / Javascript / ajax. When you see this demo you'll really appreciate how advanced DHTML with javascript is: <a href="http://www.openlaszlo.org/demos#LZPIX%20in%20OL4" rel="nofollow"><a href="http://www.openlaszlo.org/demos#LZPIX%20in%20OL4" rel="nofollow">http://www.openlaszlo.org/demos#LZPIX%20in%20OL4</a></a> </p>

<p>Re: it being a high level language; this always has pros and cons. Such a language works well if it's good at expressing commonly-identified patterns that people spend a lot of time trying to express easily. Some of the ajax mechanisms may be like that, but there are also some pretty useful mechanisms to support that. Fundamentally, it generates javascript, and when it comes to debugging, you'll be debugging javascript. Unless they build a debugger as well?</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-03-01T14:06:43Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3555-comment:29693</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3555" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/morfik_ajax_platform.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/morfik_ajax_platform.php#c29693" />
    <title>Comment from alr on 2007-03-01</title>
    <author>
        <name>alr</name>
        <uri>http://emplify.de</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://emplify.de">
        <![CDATA[<p>Hi</p>

<p>I evuluated Morfik during a study course. I was absolutely not convinced about Morfik, as it was too much beta (missing features and documentation, things not working as expected) and too less usable. Especially for people who like to see, what actually happens (read: programmers) this tool is a knightmare to debug. Hopefully the 1.0 version will proof better.<br />
However I will write my diploma thesis now about GWT and looking much more into it. :-)</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-03-01T15:12:33Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3555-comment:29694</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3555" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/morfik_ajax_platform.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/morfik_ajax_platform.php#c29694" />
    <title>Comment from Todd on 2007-03-01</title>
    <author>
        <name>Todd</name>
        <uri>http://sitesquad.net</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://sitesquad.net">
        <![CDATA[<p>Commercial Ajax solutions sound intriguing but I don't think they'll have a large standalone footprint long-term. These companies will ultimately get acquired for their know-how, not their market penetration. </p>

<p>Zapatec, another AJAX marketer, is very compelling out of the box. I've used it on some basic assigments. They've got some nice polished functions. But it's buggy. My partner, meanwhile, has used scriptaculous. Long range, I can't see us paying big bucks for commercial Ajax licenses to distribute our products/services. We'll put the work in ourselves. </p>

<p>Also, I went to Morfik's website. Did anyone see those URLs? Ugly.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-03-01T15:18:41Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3555-comment:29695</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3555" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/morfik_ajax_platform.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/morfik_ajax_platform.php#c29695" />
    <title>Comment from Peter Illes on 2007-03-01</title>
    <author>
        <name>Peter Illes</name>
        <uri>http://www.pannonrex.com/piBlog</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.pannonrex.com/piBlog">
        <![CDATA[<p>Julian: <br />
- they DO include a full-featured debugger both for the browser code and for the server code :-)))<br />
- you don't have to see the JavaScript *if you don't want* AT ALL; neither deal with HTML, or XML, or... all of this is taken care of :-)))<br />
- BUT you can also get your hands wet, if you want ;-)</p>

<p>Neil: <br />
- ALL applications in the world finally end up being run in machine code; so shall we throw out all the compilers/interpreters, even assemblers out there and take out our Monitor programs to poke around hex opcodes, hand calculating relative jumps?<br />
- We are on web time, so productivity is king as long as the solution is efficient (does not require exorbitant resources to run). Morfik is exactly doing that: you can develop in a truly RAD environment (visual design + database design + debugging, etc.) and the generated code is (a) compiled machine code on the server (no CLI or byte code, script interpreter can beat that raw performance) (b) optimized code on the client (most statements translate 1-to-1 to JavaScript).<br />
- Scripting languages (like JavaScript) are perfect for many  things, but are not particularly suited for large scale development due to their lack of "proper" OO, strong type checking, etc.<br />
- Morfik has the potential to become the Visual Basic or Access or FoxPro of the web: when there are budget constraints and the task is clean you don't want to pay someone who has to orchestrate and work with all of (X)HTML, DOM, JavaScript, XML, SOAP, PHP/Java/ASP.NET/whatever, Apache configuration, database configuration, etc. instead you want someone focus on the business logic and clear visual design and rely on a platform taking care of the rest efficiently. <br />
- As an example: in cca. one week's time I created a prototypical Weekly Calendar control that rivals the functionality of Goggle Calendar's weekly view (you will be able to check out in a few days at <a href="http://www.menturio.hu)." rel="nofollow"><a href="http://www.menturio.hu)." rel="nofollow">http://www.menturio.hu).</a></a></p>

<p>Colin: <br />
- GWT covers probably 20% of Morfik functionality (GWT: UI toolkit; Morfik: complete environment); OTOH it does have a bright future, too :-)</p>

<p>Steve:<br />
- I created a few fun sample apps that border on the "insanely not AJAX" tag (e.g. my Pong game) and also working on a Visio-like flowcharting engine -- all this is great fun!<br />
- The pros always want to understand the "how", and you can: the app framework source code is included, itself written in a high level OO language.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-03-01T15:19:20Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3555-comment:29696</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3555" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/morfik_ajax_platform.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/morfik_ajax_platform.php#c29696" />
    <title>Comment from Konstantin on 2007-03-01</title>
    <author>
        <name>Konstantin</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>That's what Microsoft's ASP.ET AJAX already is. You use any web server (asp.net, php, ...), call web services right from ajax and you can surely write ajax controls as well. There's also a prototype technology where you can convert C# code to JavaScript.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-03-01T16:03:13Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3555-comment:29697</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3555" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/morfik_ajax_platform.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/morfik_ajax_platform.php#c29697" />
    <title>Comment from Neil Cauldwell on 2007-03-01</title>
    <author>
        <name>Neil Cauldwell</name>
        <uri>http://www.neilcauldwell.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.neilcauldwell.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the insight, Peter. I look forward to seeing the Weekly Calendar.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-03-01T16:19:30Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3555-comment:29698</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3555" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/morfik_ajax_platform.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/morfik_ajax_platform.php#c29698" />
    <title>Comment from Thomas Hansen on 2007-03-01</title>
    <author>
        <name>Thomas Hansen</name>
        <uri>http://ajaxwidgets.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://ajaxwidgets.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>There's more than one company competing with all those...<br />
(Check out my signature... ;)</p>

<p>.t</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-03-01T19:59:33Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3555-comment:29699</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3555" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/morfik_ajax_platform.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/morfik_ajax_platform.php#c29699" />
    <title>Comment from Patrick Bucher on 2007-03-01</title>
    <author>
        <name>Patrick Bucher</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>It is my opinion that this is precisely what Yahoo is doing with YUI. Eventually, they will move to a similar model. Already, they are pushing developers to load the js directly from Yahoo.com. The whole problem is having a consistent adoption of an API. I think Yahoo is way ahead and will win ultimately.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-03-01T21:07:21Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3555-comment:29700</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3555" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/morfik_ajax_platform.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/morfik_ajax_platform.php#c29700" />
    <title>Comment from Nigel Parker on 2007-03-01</title>
    <author>
        <name>Nigel Parker</name>
        <uri>http://blogs.msdn.com/nigel</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blogs.msdn.com/nigel">
        <![CDATA[<p>Or if you are a .NET programmer you could use something like Script# ( <a href="http://projects.nikhilk.net/Binaries/ScriptSharp.pdf" rel="nofollow"><a href="http://projects.nikhilk.net/Binaries/ScriptSharp.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://projects.nikhilk.net/Binaries/ScriptSharp.pdf</a></a> ) to translate from C# to JavaScript for Free!</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-03-01T21:08:30Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3555-comment:29701</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3555" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/morfik_ajax_platform.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/morfik_ajax_platform.php#c29701" />
    <title>Comment from G@ur@v on 2007-03-01</title>
    <author>
        <name>G@ur@v</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>The lab experiment, doesn't even load properly my browser. giggles :)</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-03-01T22:32:45Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3555-comment:29702</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3555" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/morfik_ajax_platform.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/morfik_ajax_platform.php#c29702" />
    <title>Comment from Nick Lothian on 2007-03-01</title>
    <author>
        <name>Nick Lothian</name>
        <uri>http://wwwscope.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://wwwscope.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>I suspect Google doesn't use GWT for it's apps because of timeframes. Gmail & Google Maps were developed well before GWT, and so I think that GWT was developed FROM those apps, rather than the other way around.</p>

<p>The big advantage GWT has it that it is open source & free. That means a lot more developers will play with it and become familiar enough to recommend it.</p>

<p>Development tools from independent companies always struggle because it's SO difficult to build marketshare, and without marketshare it's difficult to find developers.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-03-01T23:43:47Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3555-comment:29703</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3555" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/morfik_ajax_platform.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/morfik_ajax_platform.php#c29703" />
    <title>Comment from Bob Lebel on 2007-03-01</title>
    <author>
        <name>Bob Lebel</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Google Base is now using GWT by the way...</p>

<p><a href="http://googlebase.blogspot.com/2006/12/plastic-surgery.html" rel="nofollow"><a href="http://googlebase.blogspot.com/2006/12/plastic-surgery.html" rel="nofollow">http://googlebase.blogspot.com/2006/12/plastic-surgery.html</a></a></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-03-01T23:59:52Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3555-comment:29704</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3555" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/morfik_ajax_platform.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/morfik_ajax_platform.php#c29704" />
    <title>Comment from Peter Illes on 2007-03-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>Peter Illes</name>
        <uri>http://www.pannonrex.com/piBlog</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.pannonrex.com/piBlog">
        <![CDATA[<p>Dear Neil & Co.,</p>

<p>My Calendar demo is now on-line at <a href="http://calendar.labs.morfik.com" rel="nofollow"><a href="http://calendar.labs.morfik.com" rel="nofollow">http://calendar.labs.morfik.com</a></a></p>

<p>Please check it out and come over to my piBlog (at <a href="http://www.pannonrex.com/blog" rel="nofollow"><a href="http://www.pannonrex.com/blog" rel="nofollow">http://www.pannonrex.com/blog</a></a> ) to discuss it in details, or drop me a mail. I am *very* interested in your opinion.</p>

<p>Please keep in mind, that it was approx. one week's time, so of course, it is not fully functional, but I am quite happy about the "draggability" and the seemingly simple algorithm that packs parallel events next to each other (it looks better than Outlook, IMHO:) I'm continuing the development, so if anyone is interested, just drop me a mail.</p>

<p>Peter</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-03-06T09:06:55Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3555-comment:29705</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3555" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/morfik_ajax_platform.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/morfik_ajax_platform.php#c29705" />
    <title>Comment from Allerguten on 2007-04-07</title>
    <author>
        <name>Allerguten</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>This takes my back to a good idea that did not fly: BeOS</p>

<p>I hope insperation prevails... all obstacles</p>

<p>Over come the if's and butt's, concentrating on the top 10% of the market share ... for acceptance</p>

<p>Then with the easy to use, offer it free, advance utilities charge...</p>

<p>Allow pirating...  that how MS gained its strong hold...</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-04-08T00:18:57Z</published>
  </entry>

</feed>