<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" 
      xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/technorati_100_what_is_hot.php" />
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/atom.xml" />
  <id>tag:,2008:/1/tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3578-</id>
  <updated>2008-08-22T19:01:11Z</updated>
  <title>Comments for Technorati 100: What&apos;s Hot in the Blogosphere</title>
  
  <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 4.1</generator>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3578</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/technorati_100_what_is_hot.php" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=3578" title="Technorati 100: What's Hot in the Blogosphere" />
    <published>2007-03-09T20:45:49Z</published>
    <updated>2007-12-16T23:11:11Z</updated>
    <title>Technorati 100: What&apos;s Hot in the Blogosphere</title>
    <summary> Earlier this week Emre wrote about declining traffic on Technorati and considered the exit options for this blog vertical search and portal site. The challenge from Google Blogsearch is certainly serious. It is difficult to compete with Google on speed and breadth of the results. But Technorati is more than a search engine for...</summary>
    <author>
      <name>Alex Iskold</name>
      <uri>http://www.adaptiveblue.com</uri>
    </author>
    
    <category term="Analysis" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.readwriteweb.com/">
      <![CDATA[<p><img border="0"
src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/technorati100/technorati_logo.jpg" align="left"
hspace="5" vspace="5" width="232" height="45" /> Earlier this week Emre wrote about <a
href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/technorati_opportunities_exit.php">declining
traffic on Technorati</a> and considered the exit options for this blog vertical search
and portal site. The challenge from Google Blogsearch is certainly serious. It is
difficult to compete with Google on speed and breadth of the results. But Technorati is
more than a search engine for blogs - it is also a directory and a popularity site. In
this post, we tap into Technorati to review the current 100 popular blogs. We attempt to
understand what is popular in the blogosphere today; and why.</p>

<h2>How Technorati measures popularity</h2>

<p>Technorati has a three ways of measuring popularity. Firstly an automated system based
on links from other blogs. This is similar to the original Google page rank algorithm,
which essentially says that importance of the site equals the number of incoming links.
Technorati measures the popularity of the blog by number of incoming links to its
posts.&nbsp;</p>

<p>Another measure of popularity is favorites. Each user of Technorati can favorite any
blog they like. This can be done via a bookmarklet or directly on Technorati site - for
example <a href="http://technorati.com/faves?add=http://www.readwriteweb.com">click here
to Favorite</a> Read/WriteWeb ;-).&nbsp;</p>

<p>Finally, recently Technorati introduced a Digg-like way of measuring popularity,
called <a href="http://technorati.com/wtf/">WTF</a>. It lets users vote on blog
posts.</p>]]>
      <![CDATA[<p>Of all the three ways that we described, the automated way is the most robust. The
favorited is probably second best because it lets people who visit a blog and get
familiar with it, then add it to their Technorati Favorites. The digg-like feature is
difficult to take as a measure of goodness, at least for a single post. More time needs
to pass before this voting scheme can really kick in and give robust results. So for this
post, we will only judge the automated measure - but you can deploy the same technique to
analyze rankings by other approaches.</p>

<h2>Engadget - the most linked to blog</h2>

<p>According to Technorati, <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> is the top
linked-to blog. Technorati counts 428,199 links from 27,289 blogs, while Google
Blogsearch counts 179,035 links. Here is the Alexa chart showing Engadget's growing rank
over the last five years.</p>

<p><img src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/technorati100/engadget_alexa.png" /></p>

<p>The next chart is the daily page views. We've used Technorati itself as a comparison,
because Alexa now normalizes the data and it's not obvious what the number stands for. It
appears to be to percentage of the total daily page views tracked by Alexa.</p>

<p><img
src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/technorati100/engadget_alexa_pv.png" /></p>

<h2>Top 20 blogs</h2>

<p>Next we look at the <a href="http://technorati.com/pop/blogs/">top 20 blogs in
Technorati</a> and analyze topics, distribution of links and a relative weight.
Incidentally, Read/WriteWeb is (as of this writing) ranked <b>number 42</b> in Technorati
- we've been steadily climbing the charts this year :-)</p>

<table frame="VOID" cellspacing="0" cols="4" rules="GROUPS" border="1">
<colgroup>
<col width="199" />
<col width="119" />
<col width="143" />
<col width="58" /></colgroup>

<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="199" height="18" align="left" bgcolor="#A81E13"><b><font
color="#FFFFFF">Blog</font></b></td>
<td width="119" align="left" bgcolor="#A81E13"><b><font color="#FFFFFF">Links from
blogs</font></b></td>
<td width="143" align="left" bgcolor="#A81E13"><b><font
color="#FFFFFF">Topic</font></b></td>
<td width="58" align="left" bgcolor="#A81E13"><b><font
color="#FFFFFF">Weight</font></b></td>
</tr>
</tbody>

<tbody>
<tr>
<td height="18" align="left" sdnum="1033;0;@"><a
href="http://www.engadget.com/">http://www.engadget.com</a></td>
<td align="right" sdval="27268" sdnum="1033;">27268</td>
<td align="left" bgcolor="#E8ECF7">Gadgets</td>
<td align="right" sdval="0.108944752529046" sdnum="1033;">0.11</td>
</tr>
</tbody>

<tbody>
<tr>
<td height="18" align="left"><a
href="http://www.boingboing.net/">http://www.boingboing.net</a></td>
<td align="right" sdval="20279" sdnum="1033;">20279</td>
<td align="left" bgcolor="#FFCC99">Tech Culture</td>
<td align="right" sdval="0.0810213670432934" sdnum="1033;">0.08</td>
</tr>
</tbody>

<tbody>
<tr>
<td height="18" align="left"><a
href="http://creativecommons.org/">http://creativecommons.org</a></td>
<td align="right" sdval="19996" sdnum="1033;">19996</td>
<td align="left">Open Source</td>
<td align="right" sdval="0.0798906876767935" sdnum="1033;">0.08</td>
</tr>
</tbody>

<tbody>
<tr>
<td height="18" align="left"><a
href="http://www.gizmodo.com/">http://www.gizmodo.com</a></td>
<td align="right" sdval="17052" sdnum="1033;">17052</td>
<td align="left" bgcolor="#E8ECF7">Gadgets</td>
<td align="right" sdval="0.0681284259984338" sdnum="1033;">0.07</td>
</tr>
</tbody>

<tbody>
<tr>
<td height="18" align="left"><a
href="http://www.techcrunch.com/">http://www.techcrunch.com</a></td>
<td align="right" sdval="16873" sdnum="1033;">16873</td>
<td align="left" bgcolor="#FFCC99">Tech News</td>
<td align="right" sdval="0.067413261310789" sdnum="1033;">0.07</td>
</tr>
</tbody>

<tbody>
<tr>
<td height="18" align="left"><a
href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/">http://www.huffingtonpost.com</a></td>
<td align="right" sdval="14516" sdnum="1033;">14516</td>
<td align="left" bgcolor="#FFFFCC">Politics</td>
<td align="right" sdval="0.0579962603678903" sdnum="1033;">0.06</td>
</tr>
</tbody>

<tbody>
<tr>
<td height="18" align="left"><a
href="http://www.todaylink.ir/">http://www.todaylink.ir</a></td>
<td align="right" sdval="13494" sdnum="1033;">13494</td>
<td align="left">???</td>
<td align="right" sdval="0.0539130295814489" sdnum="1033;">0.05</td>
</tr>
</tbody>

<tbody>
<tr>
<td height="18" align="left"><a
href="http://www.lifehacker.com/">http://www.lifehacker.com</a></td>
<td align="right" sdval="12894" sdnum="1033;">12894</td>
<td align="left" bgcolor="#FFCC99">Tech Productivity Tips</td>
<td align="right" sdval="0.051515829511131" sdnum="1033;">0.05</td>
</tr>
</tbody>

<tbody>
<tr>
<td height="18" align="left"><a
href="http://www.dailykos.com/">http://www.dailykos.com/</a></td>
<td align="right" sdval="11443" sdnum="1033;">11443</td>
<td align="left" bgcolor="#FFFFCC">Politics</td>
<td align="right" sdval="0.0457186006744123" sdnum="1033;">0.05</td>
</tr>
</tbody>

<tbody>
<tr>
<td height="18" align="left"><a
href="http://postsecret.blogspot.com/">http://postsecret.blogspot.com/</a></td>
<td align="right" sdval="10949" sdnum="1033;">10949</td>
<td align="left">Art/Mystery</td>
<td align="right" sdval="0.0437449059498506" sdnum="1033;">0.04</td>
</tr>
</tbody>

<tbody>
<tr>
<td height="18" align="left"><a
href="http://arstechnica.com/">http://arstechnica.com</a></td>
<td align="right" sdval="10702" sdnum="1033;">10702</td>
<td align="left" bgcolor="#FFCC99">Tech News/Analysis</td>
<td align="right" sdval="0.0427580585875697" sdnum="1033;">0.04</td>
</tr>
</tbody>

<tbody>
<tr>
<td height="18" align="left"><a
href="http://michellemalkin.com/">http://michellemalkin.com/</a></td>
<td align="right" sdval="10345" sdnum="1033;">10345</td>
<td align="left" bgcolor="#FFFFCC">Politics</td>
<td align="right" sdval="0.0413317245457306" sdnum="1033;">0.04</td>
</tr>
</tbody>

<tbody>
<tr>
<td height="18" align="left"><a
href="http://thinkprogress.org/">http://thinkprogress.org</a></td>
<td align="right" sdval="9549" sdnum="1033;">9549</td>
<td align="left" bgcolor="#FFFFCC">Politics</td>
<td align="right" sdval="0.0381514391191089" sdnum="1033;">0.04</td>
</tr>
</tbody>

<tbody>
<tr>
<td height="18" align="left"><a
href="http://www.crooksandliars.com/">http://www.crooksandliars.com</a></td>
<td align="right" sdval="8601" sdnum="1033;">8601</td>
<td align="left" bgcolor="#FFFFCC">Politics</td>
<td align="right" sdval="0.0343638630080066" sdnum="1033;">0.03</td>
</tr>
</tbody>

<tbody>
<tr>
<td height="18" align="left"><a
href="http://yanxi.bokewu.com/">http://yanxi.bokewu.com</a></td>
<td align="right" sdval="8457" sdnum="1033;">8457</td>
<td align="left">???</td>
<td align="right" sdval="0.0337885349911304" sdnum="1033;">0.03</td>
</tr>
</tbody>

<tbody>
<tr>
<td height="18" align="left"><a href="http://www.tmz.com/">http://www.tmz.com/</a></td>
<td align="right" sdval="8343" sdnum="1033;">8343</td>
<td align="left">Pop culture</td>
<td align="right" sdval="0.03333306697777" sdnum="1033;">0.03</td>
</tr>
</tbody>

<tbody>
<tr>
<td height="18" align="left"><a
href="http://fans.persianblog.com/">http://fans.persianblog.com</a></td>
<td align="right" sdval="8141" sdnum="1033;">8141</td>
<td align="left">???</td>
<td align="right" sdval="0.0325260096207629" sdnum="1033;">0.03</td>
</tr>
</tbody>

<tbody>
<tr>
<td height="18" align="left"><a
href="http://googleblog.blogspot.com/">http://googleblog.blogspot.com</a></td>
<td align="right" sdval="7320" sdnum="1033;">7320</td>
<td align="left" bgcolor="#FFCC99">Tech/Google</td>
<td align="right" sdval="0.029245840857878" sdnum="1033;">0.03</td>
</tr>
</tbody>

<tbody>
<tr>
<td height="18" align="left"><a
href="http://sethgodin.typepad.com/">http://sethgodin.typepad.com</a></td>
<td align="right" sdval="7101" sdnum="1033;">7101</td>
<td align="left">Marketing</td>
<td align="right" sdval="0.028370862832212" sdnum="1033;">0.03</td>
</tr>
</tbody>

<tbody>
<tr>
<td height="18" align="left"><a
href="http://instapundit.com/">http://instapundit.com/</a></td>
<td align="right" sdval="6969" sdnum="1033;">6969</td>
<td align="left" bgcolor="#FFFFCC">Politics</td>
<td align="right" sdval="0.027843478816742" sdnum="1033;">0.03</td>
</tr>
</tbody>

<tbody>
<tr>
<td height="17" align="left" bgcolor="#A81E13"><b><font
color="#FFFFFF">Total</font></b></td>
<td align="right" bgcolor="#A81E13" sdval="250292" sdnum="1033;"><b><font
color="#FFFFFF">250292</font></b></td>
<td align="left" bgcolor="#A81E13"><b><font color="#FFFFFF"><br />
</font></b></td>
<td align="left" bgcolor="#A81E13"><b><font color="#FFFFFF"><br />
</font></b></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<br />
<p>Two gadget blogs hold first and fourth spot. Strickly speaking, the top twenty blogs
are dominated by Politics. Note that we classified under <em>Technology</em> fairly
different blogs like BoingBoing, TechCrunch and LifeHacker. Still it is no surprise to
see <b>politics</b>, <b>technology</b> and <b>gadgets</b> as the three most discussed
topics. The Blogosphere is expanding to the masses, but the at the heart of it is
technology. Techies love gadgets, so that makes sense too. But politics is actually a
natural and non-geeky thing to be discussed on blogs. People want to talk back at the
analyists on CNN and so blogs are the perfect way to do this.</p>

<p>I also want to highlight two other blogs in the top twenty. First there is an
Art/Mystery blog <a href="http://postsecret.blogspot.com/">Post Secret</a>. I am not sure
I get it completely, but it seems to be a blog where artists upload postcards that are
both art and contain an encoded secret. The second notable blog is <a
href="http://sethgodin.typepad.com">http://sethgodin.typepad.com</a>, a blog written by
marketing guru Seth Goddin. The blog contains marketing tips and anecdotes and that are
not only useful, but also fun to read.</p>

<p>Next we look at the distribution of links, to see if there are interesting
patterns.</p>

<p><img
src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/technorati100/distribution_top_20.png" /></p>

<p>There are two things to note here. First, the number one blog, Engadget, has
significantly more blogs pointing to it than the #2 blog BoingBoing. The second thing is
that the differences between the rest of the blogs is about the same (one exception is
the dip between the 3rd and 4th blogs). This is remarkable and it implies very close
competition. You can also infer this by summing up all the incoming links and then
normalizing individual blogs by this factor - this is what we show in the weight column
in the Top 20 table above (last column). Doing the weight is useful, because you conclude
for example that even though there are 2 gadget blogs and 6 politics blogs, the weight in
each category is about the same.</p>

<h2>Top 100 blogs</h2>

<p>Finally we analyze the topics of the top 100 blogs. Please note that we might have
missed a blog or two or classified them differently. Also over 10% of blogs we classified
as 'other'. In addition, we have not listed categories with just one blog in them.
Neverthless, the chart below should give you insight into what is popular in the
blogosphere:</p>

<p><img
src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/technorati100/popular_blog_topics.png" /></p>

<p>From the chart we can see that Tech is the number one focus of popular blogs. Politics
is second and pop culture third, which clearly gets a lot of attention both off line and
online. The other categories have significantly less blogs representing them in the top
100.</p>

<h2>Conclusion</h2>

<p>We wrap up this post with another chart, this one from blogpulse:</p>

<p><img
src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/technorati100/blogpulse_trends.png" /></p>

<p><font style="float: right"><script type="text/javascript">
digg_url = 'http://digg.com/tech_news/A_Look_at_the_Technorati_100_What_s_Hot_In_the_Blogosphere';
</script>
<script src="http://digg.com/tools/diggthis.js"
type="text/javascript"></script></font>The data in this chart does not disagree with Technorati (although it does not exactly
match). So it seems like the blogosphere is buzzing about Technology, Politics and Pop
Culture. And of course, gadgets! Please tell us your favorite topics online, since this
is technical blog and it would be great to get non-technical blog pointers.</p><br />]]>
    </content>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3578-comment:29983</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3578" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/technorati_100_what_is_hot.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/technorati_100_what_is_hot.php#c29983" />
    <title>Comment from John Milan on 2007-03-09</title>
    <author>
        <name>John Milan</name>
        <uri>http://intelligantt.blogspot.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://intelligantt.blogspot.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>As a fairly new father I'm very surprised that parenthood/kids don't make it into the top 9 blog topics you outlined.</p>

<p>Reproduction has to be high on someone's list, since it's necessary for our survival, right? Of course, once you have kids, that basically turns into your circle for the next few years of ear aches, rashes and other items :)</p>

<p>Perhaps this reflects that the mainstream hasn't quite adopted blogging-- or that kids take up too much time to do any blogging.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-03-09T20:59:08Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3578-comment:29984</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3578" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/technorati_100_what_is_hot.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/technorati_100_what_is_hot.php#c29984" />
    <title>Comment from Jitendra on 2007-03-09</title>
    <author>
        <name>Jitendra</name>
        <uri>http://karmaweb.wordpress.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://karmaweb.wordpress.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>Alex, Great post...I had a couple of questions. Do you have any idea how Technorati deals with the issue of spam blogs? These are blogs that are just there for SEO optimizers to boost pagerank/links for certain blogs and website? </p>

<p>Also does Technorati treat an incoming link from a non-blog site differently from a blog site?</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-03-09T21:50:25Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3578-comment:29985</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3578" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/technorati_100_what_is_hot.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/technorati_100_what_is_hot.php#c29985" />
    <title>Comment from Alex Iskold on 2007-03-09</title>
    <author>
        <name>Alex Iskold</name>
        <uri>http://www.adaptiveblue.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.adaptiveblue.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>Jitendra,</p>

<p>Great questions... Perhaps someone from Technorati would comment, that would be good to know.</p>

<p>Alex</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-03-09T21:52:51Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3578-comment:29986</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3578" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/technorati_100_what_is_hot.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/technorati_100_what_is_hot.php#c29986" />
    <title>Comment from rick gregory on 2007-03-09</title>
    <author>
        <name>rick gregory</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Good post... lots of interesting info. But the attention we give to the Technorati 100 and other similar "Top N" metrics has always worried me - it's an MSM measurement used on a media ecosystem that is supposed to be new. Not just decentralized and user created, but in many ways fundamentally different. While it's fun to look at this stuff it doesn't really get what blogs are all about - see the above comment on parenthood for example. for a parent, esp a new one, blogs about that are far more important that Engadget. </p>

<p>It would be fascinating to see some information one segments, how these organize themselves and evolve over time. Hmmm....</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-03-09T21:56:08Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3578-comment:29987</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3578" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/technorati_100_what_is_hot.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/technorati_100_what_is_hot.php#c29987" />
    <title>Comment from Fahd Butt on 2007-03-09</title>
    <author>
        <name>Fahd Butt</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>I came across Post Secret a few weeks back at a bookstore. You can think of it as a social art experiment where the sites creator asked people to send in 'creative' postcards anonymously - with the message being a big secret in their life. The secrets aren't typically cryptic, just presented in an artsy way. It's fun yet pretty cool look into social taboos and common secrets. Its great for when you have nothing to do, which is why its probably one of the top blogs.</p>

<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Post_Secret" rel="nofollow"><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Post_Secret" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Post_Secret</a></a></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-03-09T22:08:27Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3578-comment:29988</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3578" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/technorati_100_what_is_hot.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/technorati_100_what_is_hot.php#c29988" />
    <title>Comment from Josh on 2007-03-09</title>
    <author>
        <name>Josh</name>
        <uri>http://www.mockriot.com/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.mockriot.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>I work for one of the web's larger political sites, so I'm supposed to say politics... but I mostly read tech blogs. ;)</p>

<p>Great post, Alex.  One thing about the Technorati top 100 is that those links are aggregated over a long period of time.  So it's hard to tell what's hot <i>now</i>.  For example, in the past week, tech blogs might have gotten many more links than political blogs, or maybe gossip blogs did... but because of the lead that political blogs have build up, they appear more in the top 20.</p>

<p>Another site you could look at is Tailrank (since it tracks more blogs total than Gabe's sites).  Their "General" tab is almost always dominated by politics.  But I am not sure if that is by design or simply due to the weight those posts carry.</p>

<p>It would be awesome if Kevin Burton tapped into that data to provide some buzz metrics on what type of content is truly being talked about most day to day. :)</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-03-09T22:54:06Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3578-comment:29989</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3578" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/technorati_100_what_is_hot.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/technorati_100_what_is_hot.php#c29989" />
    <title>Comment from Joe Duck on 2007-03-09</title>
    <author>
        <name>Joe Duck</name>
        <uri>http://joeduck.wordpress.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://joeduck.wordpress.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>Thank you for an excellent summary of a lot of information. Also interesting is the rather spectacular disconnect between what people write about (tech, politics) and what people search for (pop culture stuff).  I expect this gap to shrink over time as blogging becomes easier and less the province of technophiles but it's very important to realize that bloggers are not representative of mainstream interests.   ... At least I HOPE NOT!?....</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-03-10T00:50:03Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3578-comment:29990</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3578" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/technorati_100_what_is_hot.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/technorati_100_what_is_hot.php#c29990" />
    <title>Comment from fareed on 2007-03-09</title>
    <author>
        <name>fareed</name>
        <uri>http://fareed.wordpress.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://fareed.wordpress.com">
        <![CDATA[<p><br />
It's really interesting how flat the "tail" of the popularity graph is.... I wonder how that looks out to the top 1000 or 10,000 blogs. Are there other dropoffs or is it steadily and slowly decreasing? </p>

<p>But I'm most interested in why the heck there are two persian language blogs in the top 20, and even wrote my first real blog post about it.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-03-10T00:59:16Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3578-comment:29991</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3578" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/technorati_100_what_is_hot.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/technorati_100_what_is_hot.php#c29991" />
    <title>Comment from engtech on 2007-03-10</title>
    <author>
        <name>engtech</name>
        <uri>http://engtech.wordpress.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://engtech.wordpress.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>A couple of corrections:</p>

<p>Technorati WTF isn't for voting on blog posts, it's for voting on Technorati search blurbs. The blurbs are hosted on Technorati and show up in Technorati search results.</p>

<p>Most people just use the service as a way of promoting their blogs though -- the original intent was for people to provide the best explanation of a popular trend or term.</p>

<p>"art/mystery" is a bit of a poor way to describe PostSecret. It is an art project, but for a lot of people it can be better described as therapy. The secrets they are sharing aren't mysteries but rather the hidden things people carry within themselves.</p>

<p>It's been published to three books now, and has been a New York Times Best Seller.</p>

<p>Cheers</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-03-10T09:16:53Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3578-comment:29992</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3578" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/technorati_100_what_is_hot.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/technorati_100_what_is_hot.php#c29992" />
    <title>Comment from Nicole Simon on 2007-03-10</title>
    <author>
        <name>Nicole Simon</name>
        <uri>http://crueltobekind.org</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://crueltobekind.org">
        <![CDATA[<p>Boingboing is linking to other blogs and sites, so if I would be to blog about it, I would link to the original site (especially if it is one of my feeds) and perhaps the sender for the link, but not always boingboing. </p>

<p>Engadget on the other side is the melting pot for gadget news, you link to THAT to link to the message.</p>

<p>Post secret is a blog I would see rather important because it has "outside reach" as in many people do read it due to the nature of it - I post my secret but nobody knows it is me when I send the postcard in. </p>

<p>Is the value of such a blog or ranking comparable to a site like boingboing or engadgets which are hubs?</p>

<p>You have to keep in mind thoughts like this when you do compare such charts. I am not dissing your analysis btw, just as a comment.</p>

<p>Also Technorati does a link count drop for the statistics after 180 days to avoid the "was there first will never go away" synonym.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-03-10T11:00:25Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3578-comment:29993</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3578" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/technorati_100_what_is_hot.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/technorati_100_what_is_hot.php#c29993" />
    <title>Comment from Daniel Gray on 2007-03-10</title>
    <author>
        <name>Daniel Gray</name>
        <uri>http://www.geekbooks.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.geekbooks.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>Post Secret was a new one to me ... learned about it from my daughter a few weeks back, when she *asked* to the bookstore to pick up their latest book.  It's a crafty idea and a fantastic example of extending a brand from the net to print.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-03-10T13:52:25Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3578-comment:29994</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3578" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/technorati_100_what_is_hot.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/technorati_100_what_is_hot.php#c29994" />
    <title>Comment from Alex Iskold on 2007-03-10</title>
    <author>
        <name>Alex Iskold</name>
        <uri>http://www.adaptiveblue.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.adaptiveblue.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>@engtech thanks for clarification of the WTF.</p>

<p>@Nicole Simon: if you are saying that data is purged every half a year, then the graphs show more of the current picture of what people are linking it. Of course, as you are pointing out it is harder to reason through this for individual blogs. The analysis is meant to do more for averages.</p>

<p>Alex</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-03-10T14:07:39Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3578-comment:29995</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3578" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/technorati_100_what_is_hot.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/technorati_100_what_is_hot.php#c29995" />
    <title>Comment from Offal on 2007-03-10</title>
    <author>
        <name>Offal</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>You initially link to engaget, not engadget... may want to fix that.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-03-10T14:52:16Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3578-comment:29996</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3578" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/technorati_100_what_is_hot.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/technorati_100_what_is_hot.php#c29996" />
    <title>Comment from Katrineholm Review on 2007-03-10</title>
    <author>
        <name>Katrineholm Review</name>
        <uri>http://katrineholmreview.blogspot.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://katrineholmreview.blogspot.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>They should have added Katrineholm Review to the list.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-03-10T15:11:44Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3578-comment:29997</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3578" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/technorati_100_what_is_hot.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/technorati_100_what_is_hot.php#c29997" />
    <title>Comment from John Furrier on 2007-03-10</title>
    <author>
        <name>John Furrier</name>
        <uri>http://www.podtech.net</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.podtech.net">
        <![CDATA[<p>Great post guys.  Nice analysis</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-03-10T15:36:26Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3578-comment:29998</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3578" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/technorati_100_what_is_hot.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/technorati_100_what_is_hot.php#c29998" />
    <title>Comment from Joost Invite on 2007-03-10</title>
    <author>
        <name>Joost Invite</name>
        <uri>http://joost.uni.cc</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://joost.uni.cc">
        <![CDATA[<p>good summary, but I thought it was going to be top 100 topics not blogs.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-03-10T16:19:02Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3578-comment:29999</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3578" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/technorati_100_what_is_hot.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/technorati_100_what_is_hot.php#c29999" />
    <title>Comment from NRT on 2007-03-10</title>
    <author>
        <name>NRT</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>If you want to see the full top 100 on Technorati broken down by category, see this: <a href="http://www.blogpi.net/whats-in-the-technorati-top-100" rel="nofollow">What's in the Technorati Top 100?</a></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-03-10T16:26:48Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3578-comment:30000</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3578" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/technorati_100_what_is_hot.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/technorati_100_what_is_hot.php#c30000" />
    <title>Comment from March Madness on 2007-03-10</title>
    <author>
        <name>March Madness</name>
        <uri>http://www.marchmadnessnews.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.marchmadnessnews.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>Interesting graph comparing the three categories</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-03-10T17:29:00Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3578-comment:30001</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3578" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/technorati_100_what_is_hot.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/technorati_100_what_is_hot.php#c30001" />
    <title>Comment from Ravenii on 2007-03-10</title>
    <author>
        <name>Ravenii</name>
        <uri>http://weseepeople.blogspot.com/2007/03/un-boring-technorati-if-it-was-boring.html</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://weseepeople.blogspot.com/2007/03/un-boring-technorati-if-it-was-boring.html">
        <![CDATA[<p>Well Technorati is completely wrong together with the web surfing mass of this world. I could not find myself even in Technorati Top 10000000000.....</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-03-10T19:49:11Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3578-comment:30002</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3578" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/technorati_100_what_is_hot.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/technorati_100_what_is_hot.php#c30002" />
    <title>Comment from Emre Sokullu on 2007-03-10</title>
    <author>
        <name>Emre Sokullu</name>
        <uri>http://emresokullu.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://emresokullu.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>@Jitendra, I don't think Technorati's priority is to deal with spam blogs for now. Yes this is definitely an annoying problem but not that grave yet. As a developer, I can instantly figure out a few prevention methods and I'm sure they're gonna focus on this in time.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-03-10T22:26:24Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3578-comment:30003</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3578" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/technorati_100_what_is_hot.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/technorati_100_what_is_hot.php#c30003" />
    <title>Comment from Shayan Ghazizadeh on 2007-03-10</title>
    <author>
        <name>Shayan Ghazizadeh</name>
        <uri>http://www.ghazizadeh.org/shayan</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.ghazizadeh.org/shayan">
        <![CDATA[<p>Great analysis, Alex. I find it very interesting that two of the top 20 blogs are in Farsi and targeted at Iranians.</p>

<p><a href="http://www.todaylink.ir" rel="nofollow"><a href="http://www.todaylink.ir" rel="nofollow">http://www.todaylink.ir</a></a> is a news blog and <a href="http://fans.persianblog.com" rel="nofollow"><a href="http://fans.persianblog.com" rel="nofollow">http://fans.persianblog.com</a></a> is sociopolitical blog. Both of these blogs are owned by <a href="http://www.ariagostar.com/" rel="nofollow">Aria Gostar</a> which seems to be creating a conglomerate of Persian blogs.</p>

<p>Despite low levels of internet penetration in Iran, continuous censorship of political blogs by the Iranian government, and lack of a mature online advertising industry to support companies such as Aria Goster, I think it is very impressive that these two blogs make it into the top 20.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-03-10T23:00:27Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3578-comment:30004</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3578" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/technorati_100_what_is_hot.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/technorati_100_what_is_hot.php#c30004" />
    <title>Comment from Doug Karr on 2007-03-10</title>
    <author>
        <name>Doug Karr</name>
        <uri>http://douglaskarr.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://douglaskarr.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>It's an interesting comparison - but is it a fair comparison?  Technorati has a lot more analysis tools available than a simple Blog Search from Google.  I'm a fan of Google, but there's value in results and there's value in analysis.  Technorati provides quite a bit of anlysis - including, my favorite, Blog ranking.  As well they have a pretty robust API (that's not being used as much as it could be).  </p>

<p>I just <a href="http://www.douglaskarr.com/2007/03/10/technorati-rank-plugin-v2-release/" rel="nofollow">built a pretty useful plugin using the API</a> - I don't have anything to work with to do this with Google.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-03-10T23:30:35Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3578-comment:30005</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3578" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/technorati_100_what_is_hot.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/technorati_100_what_is_hot.php#c30005" />
    <title>Comment from wow on 2007-03-10</title>
    <author>
        <name>wow</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Great post. One thing that wasn't mentioned : </p>

<p>Interesting that two Iranian blogs are in the top ten, I wonder if it will do anything to dissuade Americans of the notion that Iran is a backwards nation where people still live in caves and lock their women in cages. The reality is vastly different, of course, and indeed they are among the top blogging nations.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-03-11T02:24:45Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3578-comment:30006</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3578" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/technorati_100_what_is_hot.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/technorati_100_what_is_hot.php#c30006" />
    <title>Comment from Steve Trefethen on 2007-03-10</title>
    <author>
        <name>Steve Trefethen</name>
        <uri>http://www.stevetrefethen.com/blog</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.stevetrefethen.com/blog">
        <![CDATA[<p>Technorati has some questionable techniques for counting links back to one's blog. For example, I find that many links are stale or completely broken but yet still counted as links. Additionally, it seems rather easy to game the linking system as I've seen at least one blogger who has a few thousand links back to his blog but the vast majority are from a Wordpress theme he's created that contains a link to his blog in the "Theme designed by xxx" credits in the theme footer.</p>

<p>When a ranking system takes absolutely no context into consideration you really have to question its validity.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-03-11T06:41:02Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3578-comment:30007</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3578" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/technorati_100_what_is_hot.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/technorati_100_what_is_hot.php#c30007" />
    <title>Comment from webduck on 2007-03-11</title>
    <author>
        <name>webduck</name>
        <uri>http://mywebduck.typepad.com/pentimento</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://mywebduck.typepad.com/pentimento">
        <![CDATA[<p>Re: the comment by 'wow' about American's believing Iranians live in caves...sheesh! I don't know who you talk to, but no one I know thinks that about Iranians. We were deluged with information about Iran back in the 1980's and it was obvious then that the country is advanced beyond cave dwelling! There is "intellect" and then, there is what you do with that intellect. All the education in the world won't make up for agressive inclinations. Look at the US! :(</p>

<p>Sorry, I got off topic. My point is, WHY be surprised that two Farsi blogs are popular?</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-03-11T08:47:13Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3578-comment:30008</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3578" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/technorati_100_what_is_hot.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/technorati_100_what_is_hot.php#c30008" />
    <title>Comment from gje on 2007-03-11</title>
    <author>
        <name>gje</name>
        <uri>http://www.happyhotelier.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.happyhotelier.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>@ Alex</p>

<p>Thanks for the post. FYI I came here via del.icio.us.</p>

<p><br />
@Jitendra<br />
Technorati doesn't do a lot about content scrapers. I see you are on the Wordpress platform and possibly can use this WP plug in: <br />
<a href="http://redalt.com/Resources/Plugins/AntiLeech" rel="nofollow"><a href="http://redalt.com/Resources/Plugins/AntiLeech" rel="nofollow">http://redalt.com/Resources/Plugins/AntiLeech</a></a> that i recently installed after I saw a couple of scrapers use my contents.<br />
Regards</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-03-11T10:57:10Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3578-comment:30009</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3578" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/technorati_100_what_is_hot.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/technorati_100_what_is_hot.php#c30009" />
    <title>Comment from Author Mom DogLover on 2007-03-11</title>
    <author>
        <name>Author Mom DogLover</name>
        <uri>http://karenshanley.com/blog/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://karenshanley.com/blog/">
        <![CDATA[<p>As a professional writer and mother, my interests--and therefore the blogs I read--couldn't be more different from the most popular sites. Can't tell you the last time I read a linkety-link blog like boingboing, or a political blog, for that matter.</p>

<p>I believe all Technorati has proven/shown is that the majority of people on the net are techie and politico guy types who like to read each other's blogs--which skews the data away from other top ranking blogs in other categories.</p>

<p>Now the question, in my mind, is how can Technorati create a measuring system that actually reflects all the segments equitably?</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-03-11T13:27:38Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3578-comment:30010</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3578" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/technorati_100_what_is_hot.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/technorati_100_what_is_hot.php#c30010" />
    <title>Comment from matt608 on 2007-03-11</title>
    <author>
        <name>matt608</name>
        <uri>http://matt608.blogspot.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://matt608.blogspot.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>Thats very interesting.  It just goes to show how saturated the Tech niche is for bloggers.</p>

<p>Matt</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-03-11T15:32:18Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3578-comment:30011</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3578" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/technorati_100_what_is_hot.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/technorati_100_what_is_hot.php#c30011" />
    <title>Comment from Camille Crawford on 2007-03-11</title>
    <author>
        <name>Camille Crawford</name>
        <uri>http://nowcamillecrawford.blogspot.com/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://nowcamillecrawford.blogspot.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>My personal favourite blog topics deal with personal development. My personal favourite blog on this topic is <a href="http://www.stevepavlina.com/blog/" rel="nofollow">Personal Development For Smart</a> from Steve Pavlina, as well as the tech blogs, which come 3rd or 4th in importance for me.</p>

<p>Camille <a href="http://nowcamillecrawford.blogspot.com/" rel="nofollow">NOW</a></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-03-11T19:06:49Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3578-comment:30012</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3578" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/technorati_100_what_is_hot.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/technorati_100_what_is_hot.php#c30012" />
    <title>Comment from Elaine Vigneault on 2007-03-11</title>
    <author>
        <name>Elaine Vigneault</name>
        <uri>http://www.elainevigneault.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.elainevigneault.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>Technorati's basic assumptions are wrong. <br />
Furthermore, their expressions of those assumptions are buggy.</p>

<p>More here:<br />
<a href="http://www.elainevigneault.com/category/technorati/" rel="nofollow"><a href="http://www.elainevigneault.com/category/technorati/" rel="nofollow">http://www.elainevigneault.com/category/technorati/</a></a></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-03-11T20:26:57Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3578-comment:30013</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3578" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/technorati_100_what_is_hot.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/technorati_100_what_is_hot.php#c30013" />
    <title>Comment from Richard MacManus on 2007-03-11</title>
    <author>
        <name>Richard MacManus</name>
        <uri>http://www.readwriteweb.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.readwriteweb.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>Excellent comments here. btw I fixed the "engaget" mis-spelling.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-03-11T20:41:16Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3578-comment:30014</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3578" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/technorati_100_what_is_hot.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/technorati_100_what_is_hot.php#c30014" />
    <title>Comment from David Dalka on 2007-03-11</title>
    <author>
        <name>David Dalka</name>
        <uri>http://www.daviddalka.com/createvalue/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.daviddalka.com/createvalue/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Hi, You forgot some things like some of those 100 sites aren't blogs and that there are blogs that should be in there that aren't. <br />
<a href="http://www.daviddalka.com/createvalue/2007/03/10/the-consumerist-vanishes-from-technorati-again/" rel="nofollow"><a href="http://www.daviddalka.com/createvalue/2007/03/10/the-consumerist-vanishes-from-technorati-again/" rel="nofollow">http://www.daviddalka.com/createvalue/2007/03/10/the-consumerist-vanishes-from-technorati-again/</a></a></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-03-11T21:13:10Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3578-comment:30015</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3578" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/technorati_100_what_is_hot.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/technorati_100_what_is_hot.php#c30015" />
    <title>Comment from Otis Gospodnetic on 2007-03-11</title>
    <author>
        <name>Otis Gospodnetic</name>
        <uri>http://blog.simpy.com/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blog.simpy.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Emre: I am biased, so I won't comment on splogs, except by saying that I've often read about people's disappointment in GBS splog-filled search results, as compared to Technorati's.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-03-12T01:02:36Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3578-comment:30016</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3578" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/technorati_100_what_is_hot.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/technorati_100_what_is_hot.php#c30016" />
    <title>Comment from Shawn Blanc on 2007-03-11</title>
    <author>
        <name>Shawn Blanc</name>
        <uri>http://thefightspot.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://thefightspot.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>This is a great article. I love seeing things in graphs. </p>

<p>I only read 3 of the top 100. (ProBlogger, TUAW and Seth Godin.)</p>

<p>The majority of the blogs in my RSS reader are Christian sites and Tech sites. That's what I write on and I guess that's what I like to read. I don't read one single politics blog, either.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-03-12T03:41:21Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3578-comment:30017</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3578" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/technorati_100_what_is_hot.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/technorati_100_what_is_hot.php#c30017" />
    <title>Comment from Richard MacManus on 2007-03-11</title>
    <author>
        <name>Richard MacManus</name>
        <uri>http://www.readwriteweb.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.readwriteweb.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>Shawn, you're banned from Read/WriteWeb... until you subscribe. Go on, make it 4 blogs in the top 100 you read :-)</p>

<p><a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/rss.xml" rel="nofollow"><a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/rss.xml" rel="nofollow">http://www.readwriteweb.com/rss.xml</a></a> (cough, our rss feed)</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-03-12T04:38:38Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3578-comment:30018</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3578" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/technorati_100_what_is_hot.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/technorati_100_what_is_hot.php#c30018" />
    <title>Comment from Shawn Blanc on 2007-03-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>Shawn Blanc</name>
        <uri>http://thefightspot.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://thefightspot.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>Wow, I've never been backed into a corner after commenting before. And for that I'll subscribe and see if your postings are also as clever.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-03-13T13:41:43Z</published>
  </entry>

</feed>