<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" 
      xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/compete_attention_metrics.php" />
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/atom.xml" />
  <id>tag:,2008:/1/tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3668-</id>
  <updated>2008-07-02T20:25:12Z</updated>
  <title>Comments for Compete Introduces Attention Statistics</title>
  
  <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 4.1</generator>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3668</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/compete_attention_metrics.php" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=3668" title="Compete Introduces Attention Statistics" />
    <published>2007-04-03T08:15:15Z</published>
    <updated>2007-12-16T23:11:19Z</updated>
    <title>Compete Introduces Attention Statistics</title>
    <summary>In an attempt to go beyond page views and visits, today web stats company Compete introduced &quot;Attention metrics&quot;. The reason is that interactive Web page technologies such as Ajax and Flash - not to mention online video - are making simple page views and visits increasingly outdated. With Ajax for example, information on a webpage...</summary>
    <author>
      <name>Richard MacManus</name>
      <uri>http://www.readwriteweb.com</uri>
    </author>
    
    <category term="Startups" />
    
    <category term="Statistics" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.readwriteweb.com/">
      <![CDATA[<p><img border="0" src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/compete_logo.gif" align="left" hspace="5" vspace="5" width="192" height="50" />In an attempt to go beyond page views and visits, today web stats company <a href="http://www.compete.com">Compete</a> introduced "Attention metrics". The reason is that interactive Web page technologies such as Ajax and Flash - not to mention online video - are making simple page views and visits increasingly outdated. With Ajax for example, information on a webpage can be updated without needing to refresh the page. In order to get around these issues, Compete has introduced two specific attention metrics:</p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Attention:</strong> The total time spent on a site as a percentage of the total time spent online by all U.S. internet users</li>
<li><strong>Velocity:</strong> The relative change in daily Attention; velocity is used to determine the relative growth of a website compared to other sites</li>
</ul>
<p>The move is aimed at marketing people, to help them find "high-potential advertising sites".</p>]]>
      <![CDATA[<p>To test this out, let's look at 3 popular websites - eBay, YouTube and MySpace. Here are their attention graphs on Compete:</p>
<p><img border="0" src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/compete_attention_apr07a.jpg" width="520" height="212" /></p>
<p>Interesting that all 3 sites have an almost identical traffic pattern (in terms of peaks especially). Meanwhile MySpace has an attention metric of 13.073374%. YouTube has just over 1%, while eBay has just over 3% (of total time spent online by all U.S. internet users).</p>
<p>I also tested out a number of blogs, but most of them didn't have enough data to compute (including r/ww). Also there was an instance of incorrect data in Compete, relating to one of the few tech blogs that <em>does</em> have attention data. I've said it before, but Compete really needs to improve its data for blogs - because obviously popular blogs are key niche sites that marketers are interested in. Also as a publisher I would like to be able to measure 'attention' for R/WW, so I hope Compete can provide these metrics for blogs and small sites soon.</p>
<p><em>Disclosure: Compete is a current Read/WriteWeb sponsor.</em></p>]]>
    </content>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3668-comment:31150</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3668" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/compete_attention_metrics.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/compete_attention_metrics.php#c31150" />
    <title>Comment from Mark Evans on 2007-04-03</title>
    <author>
        <name>Mark Evans</name>
        <uri>http://www.markevanstech.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.markevanstech.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>Richard,<br />
I'm curious to know how you track Read/WriteWeb's stats. Do you use one service or multiple services?</p>

<p>Mark</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-04-03T19:02:05Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3668-comment:31151</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3668" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/compete_attention_metrics.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/compete_attention_metrics.php#c31151" />
    <title>Comment from Richard MacManus on 2007-04-03</title>
    <author>
        <name>Richard MacManus</name>
        <uri>http://www.readwriteweb.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.readwriteweb.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>Hi Mark, I use multiple services - for site stats Google Analytics, Site Meter, Statcounter. I've also heard good things about CrazyEgg, so I want to try them out. For comparative stats, I use Compete, Alexa, Technorati, etc.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-04-03T19:23:09Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3668-comment:31152</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3668" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/compete_attention_metrics.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/compete_attention_metrics.php#c31152" />
    <title>Comment from Jitendra on 2007-04-04</title>
    <author>
        <name>Jitendra</name>
        <uri>http://karmaweb.wordpress.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://karmaweb.wordpress.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>This is very interesting...and definitly a move in the right direction.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-04-04T16:55:49Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3668-comment:31153</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3668" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/compete_attention_metrics.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/compete_attention_metrics.php#c31153" />
    <title>Comment from Phil Butler on 2007-04-04</title>
    <author>
        <name>Phil Butler</name>
        <uri>http://www.profy.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.profy.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>This is a great site! Thanks for the heads up and the great article. I just happened across complete last night and it tested out pretty well. Great flexibility, I always wonder about validity, but the numbers seem about right on the face of it. <br />
Thanks! Phil B.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-04-05T03:56:36Z</published>
  </entry>

</feed>