<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" 
      xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/cbs_new_online.php" />
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/atom.xml" />
  <id>tag:,2008:/1/tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3774-</id>
  <updated>2008-09-24T12:18:09Z</updated>
  <title>Comments for CBS&apos; New Online Video Strategy: Court Web 2.0</title>
  
  <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 4.1</generator>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3774</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/cbs_new_online.php" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=3774" title="CBS' New Online Video Strategy: Court Web 2.0" />
    <published>2007-05-14T16:26:10Z</published>
    <updated>2007-12-16T23:11:29Z</updated>
    <title>CBS&apos; New Online Video Strategy: Court Web 2.0</title>
    <summary>Last May CBS launched Innertube, an online video site that would allow the network&apos;s viewers to watch popular television shows like &quot;CSI&quot; and &quot;Survivor&quot; online for free, as well as bonus content and original mini shows. The site, which was ad supported and used RealPlayer, was ill-conceived from the start since it was put to...</summary>
    <author>
      <name>Josh Catone</name>
      <uri>http://www.readwriteweb.com/</uri>
    </author>
    
    <category term="News" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.readwriteweb.com/">
      <![CDATA[<p><img border="0" src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/cbs-logo.jpg" align="left" hspace="5" vspace="5" width="100" height="83" />Last May CBS launched <a href="http://www.cbs.com/innertube/">Innertube</a>, an online video site that would allow the network's viewers to watch popular television shows like "CSI" and "Survivor" online for free, as well as bonus content and original mini shows. The site, which was ad supported and used RealPlayer, was ill-conceived from the start since it was put to head-to-head with arguably more attractive offers from CBS (99-cent commercial free downloads of Survivor, and free, sans-commercials on-demand content for Comcast cable subscribers).  Eventually CBS also offered content for download on iTunes and clips via <a href="http://www.youtube.com/user/CBS">YouTube</a>, leaving Innertube in the dust.</p>

<p>But now, CBS has decided that forcing users to come to them just doesn't work, <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB117910437825901533.html?mod=technology_main_whats_news">reports the</a> <i>Wall Street Journal</i>.  Beginning this month CBS will start to distribute their popular content over ten different online destinations, including <a href="http://www.aol.com/">AOL</a> and <a href="http://www.joost.com/">Joost</a>, as part of a new initiative called the CBS Interactive Audience Network.  The company is also reportedly working on deals with web 2.0 sites like Facebook, Last.fm -- which <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/lastfm_launches_video.php">recently announced</a> it was adding video, and Slide to distribute their video content over social networks.</p>]]>
      <![CDATA[<p>Online gossip blog, Jossip <a href="http://www.jossip.com/gossip/wallstrip/cbs-news-acquiring-wallstrip-new-headache-in-eeking-out-online-profits-20070513.php">reported yesterday</a> that CBS will acquire Wall Street humor blog <a href="http://www.wallstrip.com/">WallStrip</a> for a sum of $5 million.  While that seems like a lot of money, part of the deal, according to Jossip, is that WallStrip host Lindsay Campbell will become the face of CBS' web video initiative, not unlike what Amanda Congdon, of Rocketboom fame, does for ABC. Fred Wilson, who has invested in WallStrip, <a href="http://avc.blogs.com/a_vc/2007/05/getting_the_sto.html">won't comment</a> on the legitimacy of the Jossip report. (And it might be important to note that it looks like WallStrip already has a distribution deal with ABC.)</p>

<p>According to the WSJ article CBS lags far behind the other four American television networks in terms of online video audience, and adding a well-known and well-liked video blog fontman (or in this case, woman) certainly couldn't hurt.  Though, $5 million does seem like a lot just to hire the services of a moderately popular blogger (WallStrip has 4474 Feedburner subscribers today).</p>]]>
    </content>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3774-comment:32400</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3774" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/cbs_new_online.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/cbs_new_online.php#c32400" />
    <title>Comment from sull on 2007-05-17</title>
    <author>
        <name>sull</name>
        <uri>http://sull.outputs.it</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://sull.outputs.it">
        <![CDATA[<p>what about the crap content factor?</p>

<p>i'm certainly not opposed to a cbs getting their content dispersed for people to taste and get familiar with.... but in the end, if the content is good, i'll go to cbs.com to watch it. it shouldnt matter much what site or service it is as long as the quality is there (video and content) and its simple to watch/download.  </p>

<p>make better shows!  strategize that.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-05-18T05:00:18Z</published>
  </entry>

</feed>