<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" 
      xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/everyscape_virtual_earth.php" />
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/atom.xml" />
  <id>tag:,2009:/1/tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3840-</id>
  <updated>2009-10-30T14:51:49Z</updated>
  <title>Comments for The 3D Maps Are Coming: EveryScape and Virtual Earth</title>
  
  <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 4.23-en</generator>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3840</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/everyscape_virtual_earth.php" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=3840" title="The 3D Maps Are Coming: EveryScape and Virtual Earth" />
    <published>2007-05-29T18:16:11Z</published>
    <updated>2007-12-16T23:11:34Z</updated>
    <title>The 3D Maps Are Coming: EveryScape and Virtual Earth</title>
    <summary>There were two developments in the 3D mapping space today. First Microsoft finally launched the 3D version of New York City as part of an expansion of its Virtual Earth maps. Second, Massachusetts-based start up EveryScape launched a technology demo showcasing their own (sort of) 3D map service, which uses interactive, panoramic photographs mashed up...</summary>
    <author>
      <name>Josh Catone</name>
      <uri>http://www.readwriteweb.com/</uri>
    </author>
    
    <category term="Startups" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.readwriteweb.com/">
      <![CDATA[<p><img border="0" src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/everyscape-logo.jpg" align="left" hspace="5" vspace="5" width="176" height="34" />There were two developments in the 3D mapping space today.  First Microsoft finally launched the 3D version of New York City as part of an expansion of its <a href="http://maps.live.com/">Virtual Earth maps</a>.  Second, Massachusetts-based start up <a href="http://everyscape.com/">EveryScape</a> launched a technology demo showcasing their own (sort of) 3D map service, which uses interactive, panoramic photographs mashed up with Google Maps.</p>

<p>Microsoft's <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/press/2007/may07/05-28NYC3DMA.mspx">new 3D maps</a> debuted today with nine new cities: New York (NY), Austin (TX), Cape Coral (FL), Cincinnati (OH), Indianapolis (IN), Northampton (UK), Ottawa (CAN), Savannah (GA), and Tampa (FL). The most notable, of course, being the long-awaited addition of New York City. Microsoft intends to add more cities throughout the summer.</p>]]>
      <![CDATA[<p>I hadn't tried Microsoft's 3D Virtual Earth maps until today, but was pleasantly surprised.  Everyone was impressed when Microsoft debuted their close aerial "Bird's Eye View" maps in December 2005, but because the 3D maps can be rotated and explored from any angle, while still maintaining nearly the same level of photo realism, they are infinitely more useful.  They look a lot better than the 3D maps currently offered by Google, by virtue of their photo realistic textures (they're low-res, and rather rudimentary, but still look relatively realistic).</p>

<p><img border="0" src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/virtualearth-stadium.jpg" width="520" height="256" /><br /><i>Looking inside Yankee Stadium in Virtual Earth</i></p>

<p>It took me a few tries to get the plugin properly installed, and rendering was a bit slow on my 20mpbs connection (so I can imagine people on slower connections might experience even slower maps), but in general I was very impressed by the Virtual Earth maps.</p>

<p>Today also saw the launch of a technology demo by EveryScape, a mapping company from Waltham, Massachusetts, which had been operating in stealth mode.  The company uses 360 degree panoramic photos and Google Maps to create (mostly) street-level 3D tours of entire neighborhoods.  Their demo shows off the technology in action in the Union Square neighborhood of San Francisco.  It's sort of a more sophisticated version of the old Amazon A9 Block View maps (which are no longer available).</p>

<p>EveryScape differs from the 3D options offered by Microsoft and Google in two main ways: it requires no additional browser plugins (just Flash), and it uses panoramic photos taken by humans.  The latter means that users cannot change the axis of each scene, or even change the location from where the scene is viewed.  But it also means the scenes are actually photo realistic, instead of almost photo realistic.</p>

<p><img border="0" src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/everyscape-outside.jpg" width="520" height="180" /></p>

<p>EveryScape's technology also does something else that neither Google nor Microsoft offers: <i>indoor</i> panoramic scenes.  EveryScape can theoretically take you inside businesses, restaurants, and a museums, allowing you to really virtually visit <i>every</i> part of a city or town.</p>

<p>Navigation around EveryScape panoramic images is easy.  Click and drag to spin the scene in any direction (with a full 360 degree range of motion, both left and right as well as up and down), and click the green buttons to advance to the next scene.  Clicking on the Google Map also brings you directly to the scene of that area. EveryScape also has the ability to embed marketing messages directly into their maps.  In the technology demo, they've embedded messages on a few buildings pointing out business names and providing direct links to that business' website.</p>

<p><img border="0" src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/everyscape-inside.jpg" width="520" height="184" /></p>

<p>Because each EveryScape scene is taken by a real person, filling out their inventory of maps, and completely mapping cities will take a lot of boots on the ground.  The company hopes to recruit users to become "scape artists" and help fill our their catalog of scenes.  I used to work as a photographer for a real estate company taking panoramic photos of the insides of houses.  Creating a panoramic scene is pretty simple, but generally requires a specialized camera mount for the best results, as well as a wide angle lens.  Scene stitching software is getting better, and will eventually eliminate the need for a lot of special equipment, but it can get complicated since every camera and lens is a bit different.</p>

<p>EveryScape, which has $10 million in VC funding led by Draper Fisher Jurvetson, intends to launch full cityscapes by the end of the year, starting with New York, San Francisco, Boston, and Seattle.</p>]]>
    </content>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3840-comment:33028</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3840" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/everyscape_virtual_earth.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/everyscape_virtual_earth.php#c33028" />
    <title>Comment from soxiam on 2007-05-29</title>
    <author>
        <name>soxiam</name>
        <uri>http://www.soxiam.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.soxiam.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>Two thoughts on the recent virtual maps development from google, msn and others:</p>

<p>1. Does this finally warrant an additional axis on geotag standards? Would anyone find it useful to be able to geocode the 9th floor of the empire state building?</p>

<p>2. I keep wondering how much more engaging this type of experience could be if it was integrated with other real-time technologies. What if you could walk into a particular shop on GoogleMaps, click on the webcam icon to check the merchandises in stock and have a chat with a store clerk at the same time all within a map application? Convergence is a wonderful thing to dream about.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-05-29T19:25:21Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3840-comment:33029</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3840" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/everyscape_virtual_earth.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/everyscape_virtual_earth.php#c33029" />
    <title>Comment from Jim Cheetham on 2007-05-29</title>
    <author>
        <name>Jim Cheetham</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>"Scene stitching software is getting better, and will eventually eliminate the need for a lot of special equipment, but it can get complicated since every camera and lens is a bit different."</p>

<p>The canonical open source package for scene stitching is Hugin   <a href="http://hugin.sourceforge.net/" rel="nofollow"><a href="http://hugin.sourceforge.net/" rel="nofollow">http://hugin.sourceforge.net/</a></a> and the author Pablo d'Angelo is in the process of setting up a database of photographic distortion characteristics of equipment. See <a href="http://www.linux.com/article.pl?sid=07/05/18/1631258" rel="nofollow"><a href="http://www.linux.com/article.pl?sid=07/05/18/1631258" rel="nofollow">http://www.linux.com/article.pl?sid=07/05/18/1631258</a></a> for more details.</p>

<p>This collection of open and accessible data, as well as 'best practice' source code samples (the Hugin codebase) will really help raise the technical ability for photo manipulation across the board. Open Source and Open Protocols are real convergence, in action.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-05-29T21:26:51Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3840-comment:33030</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3840" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/everyscape_virtual_earth.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/everyscape_virtual_earth.php#c33030" />
    <title>Comment from Peter on 2007-05-29</title>
    <author>
        <name>Peter</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>A few years ago I interviewed with a startup in Boulder called Churchill Navigation. Google them. I believe they do work for the DOD.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-05-30T01:18:08Z</published>
  </entry>

</feed>